LeGenD
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Messages
- 15,813
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
I am not overconfident like most Iranians. I work with facts and not propaganda.here again Legend and his belief in westrn supermacy ,honnestly have a little more faith in yourself .you remaind me of Gloom in the gulliver animation (any body remember I knew we are doomed they gonna catch us)
Iran is not an impressive conventional military power, mind you. Iran is simply improving its asymmetric warfare capabilities and boasts about it as if it has developed the most lethal weapons in the world which will smash US forces in a blink of an eye. If this objective was so easy in real life..........
Bro, truth is that Iran stands no chance against USA. Reason is that US is a far greater military power in comparison and also have enormous warfare experience under its belt.
You guys stopped Iraq and build some missiles and you guys think that you are ready to defeat the greatest military power in the world?
FACT is that Iran is employing scaremongering tactics to keep its opponents at bay. This is understandable because Iran has no other choice.
Seriously, don't be suicidal. I actually feel sorry for you guys. Because the NEXT major conflict may be against Iran. War is coming towards you. Your best bet is to significantly improve your diplomatic skills currently.
Detection is the key to all military related matters. You learn to detect the thing and then you build the counter-measures.Ballistic missiles are easy to detect but not as easy to intercept on the other hand cruise missiles acclrding to you are hard to detect but accordig to any body easy to intercept , by the way do you knew one of the roles of AWAX is to detect cruise missiles ,even if you read about F-14 you see one of the duty of 40 year old doppler x-band awg-9 radar on it is detecting and engaging cruise missiles .
US have been working on countering the threat of Ballistic Missiles (of all types) since 1990s. Their is remarkable progress in this aspect. PAC 1 taught US some valuable lessons. In addition, US itself can develop Ballistic Missiles of all types and then test its ABM systems against them. And Anti-BM capabilities are no longer in their infancy as I have pointed out earlier.
I am not saying that Iranian missile arsenal is useless. However, their is lot more detail in this subject that common guys like us miss easily. Though I have learned not to jump to conclusions quickly.
It is certainly possible to defeat a US aircraft carrier. However, accomplishing this objective is the HARD PART in real life. US aircraft carrier does not moves alone. It is protected by several vessels of different types and capabilities at all times. We coin the term 'Carrier Group' for this force. A US Carrier Group packs enormous fire-power and impressive defensive capabilities. It can gather Intel of the opponent with ease in real time and project power from long distance. Overwhelming such a force is no easy feat even through missile arsenal. Because US have the luxury to fight a (conventional war) on its own terms.
The latest Russo-Indian Brahmos cruise missle can travel at speeds in excess of Mach 2.5 constantly.Also no cruise missile move fast ,so e of them move fast in their attack phase which mean the ramjet only activate 15-20 k away from the target
Depends upon what kind of control system is in place. Cruise missile is much more controllable in comparison to any other missile. Also, time-factor might be important in case of ASBM. In case of cruise missile, its direction can be changed even at the last moment.By the way about your question about EO on ballistic missile or cruise missile ,do you think any operator is fast enough to control a ballistic missile or supersonic cruise missile tnrough its attack phase through monitor and a joystic no operator controlled EO only apllicable on old short range subsoni cruise missiles