What's new

Surprise - Many Chinese provinces already high-income/1st Wor

Status
Not open for further replies.
You are an absolute idiot so let me make it clear for you. The quality of life in the 3rd world are getting better every day because more 3rd world countries are able to produce goods that they had to BUY from you guys. Name me goods in daily life that people in the "1st world" have that people in the 3rd world don't?

You export "nothing" to 3rd world? hell yeah because more 3rd worlders don't need to buy from you guys anymore; butt-hurt ? Your 1st world are beginning to look like 3rd world due to your inability to sell like you used to. Your economies are ZERO natural resources so you MUST export to buy those natural resources and I see more and more 3rd world countries are moving up the productin chain to not buying from you guys but even competing and snatching away your market share

My prediction is that in about 30 years; Europe with no natural resources and can't export like they used to will be reduced to the level of the 3rd worlders; congratulation:lol:

Only one statement stuck out. That we have virtually no natural resources to speak of. And yet look at us. And look at you.

Inferior intelligence breeds inferior society.

If you are indeed a white supremacist in this forum, you are typical of the stupid ones I used to debate.

Back in 1776, Asians were not that well known in Europe to start, let alone in the New World. So as to your argument about the American Founders restricting immigration only from white Europe, it is illogical. Ben Franklin, one of the Founders, did not have too high of opinions about Germans, probably a white ethnic group that you admired...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/03/opinion/03davis.html?_r=0

As far as the immigration policy of late 18th century America goes, free white people were the only free people they know that could get to the New World. But...Did you know that there were free blacks in the Continental Army and state militias during Revolutionary War? In 1776, Washington changed his mind and approved the recruitment of free blacks into the Continental Army. So when the Naturalization Act of 1790 came, the 'free white person' clause was to distinguish whites from free blacks. Slaves were already excluded from citizenship. Benjamin Banneker was a free black tobacco farmer back in 1791 and he conversed with Jefferson through letters. So if the Naturalization Act of 1790 did not contain the 'free white persons' clause, Banneker would have qualified to be citizen on the spot.

Again...The Naturalization Act of 1790 had nothing to do with immigration but about qualification to be citizen. The US was intended to be an immigrant country and if the character was to be of white people, the Founders would have clearly stated so when they wrote the Constitution.


That is pathetic. The first significant Asian (Chinese) immigration to the US was in the mid-to-late 19th century. Some time after the California Gold Rush.


What stopped you before? Whether you are a Chinese false flagger or a real white supremacist here, you already made clear what kind of a despicable person you are.


And blacks today pretty much proved Jefferson wrong. Are you a flat Earther by any chance? After all, plenty of smart people in the past believed in a flat Earth.

Looks like this 'mongoloid' is giving you a run for your intellectual money, not that you got much to start. If this is the best you can bring to the table, you are a p1ss poor example of white racial superiority. But considering you have been sparing the Chinese and how much they 'Thank' you for your 'useful' posts, we can be confident that you are not what you claimed to be. It is not that difficult to troll stormfront and copy/paste here all the appropriate words and phrases.

I don't have time to respond to all of this.

The fact that you are actually arguing that the founders would have welcomed immigration of all colors just goes to show you what an idiot you are. Do you even know what society was like back then? And what a bunch of BS. People barely knew that Asia existed? You're a moron, and 3rd world one at that.
 
I don't have time to respond to all of this.
Because you have no credible rebuttal. All the time in the world will not help you.

The fact that you are actually arguing that the founders would have welcomed immigration of all colors just goes to show you what an idiot you are.
Where did I said 'all colors'? On the other hand, it is unthinkable that for a bunch of smart guys as they were, they forgot to explicitly state their preference for white people when they wrote the Constitution. Did they just naturally assumed that the world contains only whites and blacks?

Do you even know what society was like back then?
No. But apparently you have a 'Way Back Machine' and actually conversed with the American Founders?

And what a bunch of BS. People barely knew that Asia existed?
Yes, they barely knew. The only Europeans who knew of Asia with any amount of personal knowledge were the merchantmen and the navies, in other words, fairly well traveled people. Most ordinary citizens in the Old World and the New World knew of other races thru hearsay.

You're a moron, and 3rd world one at that.
Given your performance here so far, may be you should move to one of the many 3rd world countries. You would fit right in with your provincial mentality and lack of critical thinking skills typical of low education.

Am willing to bet dollars to doughnuts that you did not know among the American Founders themselves, they have their own bigotries of other white people as exampled by Ben Franklin's sentiments about Germans. Funny that the Germans are usually the ones upheld by white supremacists, assuming you are not a Chinese false flagger, as the epitome of the white race, and yet Franklin himself have barely contained contempt for that group.

Am willing to bet the same that you did not know that there were free blacks during the Revolutionary War. And this eventually influenced how the Naturalization Act of 1790 were written, and that you ended up confusing 'naturalization' with 'immigration'.

Again, assuming that you are not a Chinese false flagger, am glad that the America I know and spent nearly 20 yrs in its defense, in and out of the military, is nothing like the America you want. Your despicable kind rightfully belongs in the fringe of American society. Too bad that your kind is prominent in China as amply demonstrated by the Chinese members here.
 
Because you have no credible rebuttal. All the time in the world will not help you.


Where did I said 'all colors'? On the other hand, it is unthinkable that for a bunch of smart guys as they were, they forgot to explicitly state their preference for white people when they wrote the Constitution. Did they just naturally assumed that the world contains only whites and blacks?


No. But apparently you have a 'Way Back Machine' and actually conversed with the American Founders?


Yes, they barely knew. The only Europeans who knew of Asia with any amount of personal knowledge were the merchantmen and the navies, in other words, fairly well traveled people. Most ordinary citizens in the Old World and the New World knew of other races thru hearsay.


Given your performance here so far, may be you should move to one of the many 3rd world countries. You would fit right in with your provincial mentality and lack of critical thinking skills typical of low education.

Am willing to bet dollars to doughnuts that you did not know among the American Founders themselves, they have their own bigotries of other white people as exampled by Ben Franklin's sentiments about Germans. Funny that the Germans are usually the ones upheld by white supremacists, assuming you are not a Chinese false flagger, as the epitome of the white race, and yet Franklin himself have barely contained contempt for that group.

The reason the founding fathers never explicitly referred to non-Whites was because it was UNTHINKABLE to have immigration from non-White lands in the first place.

And yet again, you continue to avoid the fact that the founding fathers only wanted free WHITES to be naturalized, which just goes to show your functional illiteracy. Why would they make sure to include only WHITES in the naturlization law, excluding everyone else?

This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were "free white persons" of "good moral character". It thus left out American Indians, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks, and Asians. While women were included in the act, the right of citizenship did "not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States...." Citizenship was inherited exclusively through the father. This was the only statute that ever recognized the status of natural born citizen, requiring that state and federal officers not consider American children born abroad to be foreigners.

I have no rebuttal? It's simple dumba$$:

Your people were not welcome to my country until way after our Founders died. Your excuse to this is that they barely knew anything about Asia anyway. You then summarily conclude that the Founders were intelligent. The Nationalization Act of 1790 was clearly written with non-Whites in mind. It meant to exclude people of non-European stock. What's your response? That this is irrelevant because it failed to mention immigration. Do you know how unbelievably stupid you sound?

You are a false-flagger yourself buddy. Take down my people's flag, and go home.
 
The reason the founding fathers never explicitly referred to non-Whites was because it was UNTHINKABLE to have immigration from non-White lands in the first place.

And yet again, you continue to avoid the fact that the founding fathers only wanted free WHITES to be naturalized, which just goes to show your functional illiteracy. Why would they make sure to include only WHITES in the naturlization law, excluding everyone else?



I have no rebuttal? It's simple dumba$$:

Your people were not welcome to my country until way after our Founders died. Your excuse to this is that they barely knew anything about Asia anyway. You then summarily conclude that the Founders were intelligent. The Nationalization Act of 1790 was clearly written with non-Whites in mind. It meant to exclude people of non-European stock. What's your response? That this is irrelevant because it failed to mention immigration. Do you know how unbelievably stupid you sound?

You are a false-flagger yourself buddy. Take down my people's flag, and go home.
This is from a guy who said that Asians did not show up in America until the 20th century and expect his arguments to be taken seriously? :lol:
 
What stopped you before? Whether you are a Chinese false flagger or a real white supremacist here, you already made clear what kind of a despicable person you are.

As expected..an outcome of bad loser or in french call "mauvais perdant" is when he lost the temper and start personal attack. You viet are so pathetic: When a white person said something you don't like or beyond your expectation than he's white supremacist :rofl: and since you're trying to imite "some" white people with China bashing what should I call you than? Yellow supremacist imitator?:rolleyes:
 
As expected..an outcome of bad loser or in french call "mauvais perdant" is when he lost the temper and start personal attack. You viet are so pathetic: When a white person said something you don't like or beyond your expectation than he's white supremacist :rofl: and since you're trying to imite "some" white people with China bashing what should I call you than? Yellow supremacist imitator?:rolleyes:
So let me get this straight...

It is wrong to call racism/racists despicable.

Got it...
 
LOL, gambit has some weird idea in his head about how important Vietnamese are in America. :lol:

Among the hundreds of ethnic groups in America, Vietnamese have got to be one of the least cared about. No one cared when Presidential candidate McCain called them "gooks" on live TV and refused to apologize for it.

Vietnamese in America are just parasites, even Blacks/Hispanics/Chinese were there in early America in the 1800's helping to build the country up with their labour. Vietnamese came as refugees from the Vietnam war, long after America had not only been built up but several decades after they had already become a superpower.

Vietnamese are one of the most recent immigrant groups in America, they did nothing to build up America like the other groups did, they came long after the country had already become successful.
 
LOL, gambit has some weird idea in his head about how important Vietnamese are in America. :lol:

Among the hundreds of ethnic groups in America, Vietnamese have got to be one of the least cared about. No one cared when Presidential candidate McCain called them "gooks" on live TV and refused to apologize for it.

Vietnamese in America are just parasites, even Blacks/Hispanics/Chinese were there in early America in the 1800's helping to build the country up with their labour. Vietnamese came as refugees from the Vietnam war, long after America had not only been built up but several decades after they had already become a superpower.

Vietnamese are one of the most recent immigrant groups in America.

They did nothing to build up America like the other groups did, they came long after the country had already become successful.
Defending a fellow racist or a Chinese masquerading as a white supremacist? But no matter what, every country requires maintenance of those who chose to live under its laws and mores. The Viets may be recent to the US, but so are the Koreans.

choi_hee-dong_uss_chafee_jeffrey_kim_uss_john-s-mccain.jpg


Bottom line is that the US is a far superior country to your racist China, no matter how flawed we may be.
 
Defending a fellow racist or a Chinese masquerading as a white supremacist? But no matter what, every country requires maintenance of those who chose to live under its laws and mores. The Viets may be recent to the US, but so are the Koreans.

Bottom line is that the US is a far superior country to your racist China, no matter how flawed we may be.

LOL, again, Vietnamese contributed nothing to the building up of America.

Blacks/Hispanics/Chinese were there in the 1800's, when the country was being built. And obviously Whites were the biggest contributors to the rise of America, only an idiot would suggest otherwise.

Vietnamese in America are one of the most recent immigrant groups, they are almost entirely first or second generation immigrants. They came as parasites in the 1970's after the other groups had long finished building up America into a superpower, since the 1800's.

Tell me why nobody even cared that Presidential candidate McCain called Vietnamese "gooks" on live TV and refused to apologize for it?

If a Presidential candidate had made a racial slur about any of the major American ethnic minority groups, there would have been an uproar, to defend their fellow Americans. But they don't see Vietnamese as fellow Americans, they see them as the enemy from the Vietnam war. :lol: Which is why nobody cared.

Whereas other Presidential candidates like Jon Huntsman even took their time to become fluent in speaking Chinese, like the current Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. :D They care way more about the Chinese American voting base than the Vietnamese American voting base, you guys don't even get an apology from America's most senior politicians calling you "gooks".
 
And obviously Whites were the biggest contributors to the rise of America, only an idiot would suggest otherwise.
And only an idiot would make that comment without backing it up by showing who made that comment in the first place. :lol:

So what are you doing, defending a fellow racist or a Chinese masquerading as a white supremacist? No matter which, you end up looking foolish.
 
And only an idiot would make that comment without backing it up by showing who made that comment in the first place. :lol:

So what are you doing, defending a fellow racist or a Chinese masquerading as a white supremacist? No matter which, you end up looking foolish.

I'm not defending "WhiteMansBurden", he is an American with extreme views on race which I do not agree with.

The truth is though that Vietnamese contributed the least to building up America, they are the most recent immigrants and pure parasites. Which is why nobody cares when the most senior American politicians use racial slurs on them on live television.

Nobody cares, because they don't see Vietnamese as Americans, so there is no need to defend them.
 
I'm not defending "WhiteMansBurden", he is an American with extreme views on race which I do not agree with.

The truth is though that Vietnamese contributed the least to building up America, they are the most recent immigrants and pure parasites. Which is why nobody cares when the most senior American politicians use racial slurs on them on live television.

Nobody cares, because they don't see Vietnamese as Americans, so there is no need to defend them.

it's such fortunate for China not to have a a viet type like Gambit, otherwise he will claim that Vietnamese to be main contribution to the J-20. :omghaha:
 
LOL, again, Vietnamese contributed nothing to the building up of America.

Blacks/Hispanics/Chinese were there in the 1800's, when the country was being built. And obviously Whites were the biggest contributors to the rise of America, only an idiot would suggest otherwise.

Vietnamese in America are one of the most recent immigrant groups, they are almost entirely first or second generation immigrants. They came as parasites in the 1970's after the other groups had long finished building up America into a superpower, since the 1800's.

Tell me why nobody even cared that Presidential candidate McCain called Vietnamese "gooks" on live TV and refused to apologize for it?

If a Presidential candidate had made a racial slur about any of the major American ethnic minority groups, there would have been an uproar, to defend their fellow Americans. But they don't see Vietnamese as fellow Americans, they see them as the enemy from the Vietnam war. :lol: Which is why nobody cared.

Whereas other Presidential candidates like Jon Huntsman even took their time to become fluent in speaking Chinese, like the current Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. :D They care way more about the Chinese American voting base than the Vietnamese American voting base, you guys don't even get an apology from America's most senior politicians calling you "gooks".
Most of the 1.5 million Vietnamese came to the U.S in the 1990's; that's a litle more or less than 20 years and their contribution to the U.S is significant in term of science and technology . NASA does not hire a bunch of Vietnamese for no reason. Only you Chinese claim that you built up America; the Vietnamese do not. The Vietnamese only claim to make contribution to the U.S. Only the Chinese are parasite immigrants who sell out U.S technologies to China while at the same time you don't have the guts to live in your crap hole called China that you adore. :lol:
 
it's such fortunate for China not to have a a viet type like Gambit, otherwise he will claim that Vietnamese to be main contribution to the J-20. :omghaha:
Apprently you Chinese are butt-hurt to find out that the Vietnamese have made major contribution to science and technology in the U.S while remain deadly silent......just ask the Taliban who Duong Nguyet Anh is:cool:
 
Most of the 1.5 million Vietnamese came to the U.S in the 1990's; that's a litle more or less than 20 years and their contribution to the U.S is significant in term of science and technology . NASA does not hire a bunch of Vietnamese for no reason. Only you Chinese claim that you built up America; the Vietnamese do not. The Vietnamese only claim to make contribution to the U.S. Only the Chinese are parasite immigrants who sell out U.S technologies to China while at the same time you don't have the guts to live in your crap hole called China that you adore. :lol:

LOL yes, my "crap hole" called Hong Kong which has an average income 30 times more than Vietnam. :D

Even our janitors earn more per year than 15 whole Vietnamese people.

Which is why Vietnamese boat people keep trying to flood over here, even being an illegal immigrant here is something that they will risk their life for.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom