Thats argument is flawed completely. I also know a Tamil who converted to get admission to an engineering college.
Good,so what?
However, to say that religion should provide for families is utter BS. Foreign money is used by missionaries to lure people, of course its easy, to lure poor people and India has millions of them. But then asking why Hindus did not provide for the families is as hollow as it can be. Hindus are poor and don't get foreign funds. And its not as if the missionaries are providing for all the poor in India, only a few thousand or million, many of whom agree to convert for it.
Sure those who convert for benefits have every right and even makes sense, but they asking me why I did not provide for them sounds like I owe them something. I don't. I however do charity through secular NGOs, thinking I'll switch to Hindu ones now.
U failed to understand the core of the argument and easily branded it as a flawed concept.
First the point was that conversion's r not forced,like many r beating drums here,it is rather done for monetary advantages.
Have u ever been to the rural hinderlands of bastar,i have been i have seen the plight of the people there,now to those people whoever provide financial support to them is their god,they r the people who can not afford even 1 time of food,frankly speaking yes they owe it.
I am not asking that religion's should pay it's follower's,but ultimately when u cant and other's can dont start beating drum about it,if u all time think about is the loyalty of the people or falling population then rather provide them something rather than crying about someone other luring them with foreign money.
A beggar who cant have food even one time a day is not going to differentiate between foreign and Indian money.
To the false flag , no thats not my thumb.
Really a cheap attempt,I am more Indian than u,just challenging a religion made me a fake flag.