Sri Lanka snubs India, opens port to Chinese submarine again

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

I repeat again, chinese opinion on this matters less than $hit. Now take a hike.

Chinese opinion on this matters less than $hit. ... guess what that makes you?

You just know how to have bully arguments and talk tough facing our Sri Lankan friends...LMAO

 

[Luca1]

You just know how to have bully arguments and talk tough facing our Sri Lankan friends...LMAO

If he does not talk tough, India won't be a superpower.

 

[Sahasranama]

You just know how to have bully arguments and talk tough facing our Sri Lankan friends...LMAO

This discussion is about SL and India. China's opinion on this matters less than $hit.

 

[TheTruth]

Consider China is in the title of the thread, but then again Indians only need to be able to write their names to be considered literate.

 

[SrNair]

And how much India will bet on that Sri Lanka can't play??? as for China, at least we dare warn India directly but you could cowardly put pressure on Sri Lanka instead of facing China directly...LMAO

Sure our product are not reliable but we have trade surplus with India because your people believe on our junks

100% .Because once they did something that detrimental to our
sovreignity.And we gave something to them with interest.
Of course their business development is none of our business.But dont play with our security.That is all we want.About challenging us let see what would be the response of the CCP when we docked our Arihant in Vietnam.


Just wait our new NDA govt already ready to impose taxes on Chinese junks.

 

[Sahasranama]

100% .Because once they did something that detrimental to our
sovreignity.And we gave something to them with interest.
Of course their business development is none of our business.But dont play with our security.That is all we want.About challenging us let see what would be the response of the CCP when we docked our Arihant in Vietnam.
Just wait our new NDA govt already ready to impose taxes on Chinese junks.

It has nothing to do with China.

SL has breached the Indo-Sri Lanka Accord signed between the two nations in 1987. This is a SERIOUS breech of faith.

It shows SL as a dishonourable nation who does not honour its own words and agreements.

The agreement clearly says that "Trincomalee or any other ports in Sri Lanka will not be made available for military use by any country in a manner prejudicial to India's interests". The agreement also calls upon the two countries to not allow their respective territories to be used for "activities prejudicial to each other's unity, integrity and security".

 

[TheTruth]

China has no designs on India. No one told India to invade China and create a diplomatic issue.

 

[Steakhouse]

It has nothing to do with China.

SL has breached the Indo-Sri Lanka Accord signed between the two nations in 1987. This is a SERIOUS breech of faith.

It shows SL as a dishonourable nation who does not honour its own words and agreements.

The agreement clearly says that "Trincomalee or any other ports in Sri Lanka will not be made available for military use by any country in a manner prejudicial to India's interests". The agreement also calls upon the two countries to not allow their respective territories to be used for "activities prejudicial to each other's unity, integrity and security".

Since SL allow Chinese submarine temporary dock and port visit in no way threaten India security, SL didn't break any security agreement with India because China doesn't have permanent naval base on SL.

 

[Sahasranama]

Since SL allow Chinese submarine temporary dock and port visit in no way threaten India security, SL didn't break any security agreement with India because China doesn't have permanent naval base on SL.

The agreement does not say "permanent" dock, even temporary docking means SL was made available for military use by China and it was prejudicial to India's interest and security.

Its a clear breech of the treaty. The whole point of that treaty WAS to prevent such occurrences.

 

[Penguin]

An armed incursion into undisputed territory is invasion. Do you understand that it counts as an act of war?

Apparently some people don't see it that way (Russia/Ukraine)

Dont make bullshit speculation...Penguin, if there's a territorial disputes, we will settle that from Tibet.


What you bullshit again, Strategic oppenent? are we in war with India yet, our trade with India is far excede the entire SA combine all togheter, we chinese dont see India as trategic oppent but a whinner in SA. If Sri Lanka offer China a good will gesture by allowing our sub to dock doesn't mean we're planning to harm India...the problem with Indians is that they are over sensitive for what ever we do: either by build railway, dam in Tibet, either talking with Bhutan PM or sell trucks to Nepal...they toke that as security threat to their nation and cry all night long until opportunities to cooperate with our foes such Vietnam or Japan..then they will jump of joy and bragging as tilt for tat retaliation....LMAO

It is not BS speculation, it is my understanding of how this event is seen. You don't have to agree. You also don't have to be rude.

 

[Ratatat]

See a sample

Morality is a forgotten factor in this world . Especially among the 'insecurity' nations (aka) the 'guardians' of the planet
Let me ask a question to the chinese folks here
Has china ever opened the SL's war crimes to SL let alone opposing it ? Or is such acts acceptable in chinese culture ? please enlighten

 

[samv]

 

[HeinzG]

It has nothing to do with China.

SL has breached the Indo-Sri Lanka Accord signed between the two nations in 1987. This is a SERIOUS breech of faith.

It shows SL as a dishonourable nation who does not honour its own words and agreements.

The agreement clearly says that "Trincomalee or any other ports in Sri Lanka will not be made available for military use by any country in a manner prejudicial to India's interests". The agreement also calls upon the two countries to not allow their respective territories to be used for "activities prejudicial to each other's unity, integrity and security".

Indo-Lanka accord was broken by India when they didn't disarm LTTE within 24 in 1987. There is no Indo-Lanka accord active. It is India that is dishonorable.

 

[Penguin]

that is unlike china and vietnam or cuba and US,,SL and India maintain very good relationships. Actually recent times SL and India both during war and now under Modi has developed good diplomatic relationships.

Even at the lowest point of india-SL relations it has never been the same as cuba and us or china/vietnam..

This is the result of immature media of india....brainwashing of ppl

Can China and Vietnam Overcome Their Territorial Disputes? | The Diplomat
How Vietnam Woos China and India Simultaneously | The Diplomat
China–Vietnam relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
China Policy Institute Blog » Vietnam’s Relations with China – A Multifaceted Partnership

BBC News - Timeline: US-Cuba relations
Cuba–United States relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Sahasranama]

Indo-Lanka accord was broken by India when they didn't disarm LTTE within 24 in 1987. There is no Indo-Lanka accord active. It is India that is dishonorable.

Then let the SL govt. have the balls to say it out loud and clear so there is no more confusion left

Until they do that, the accord still stands and SL will be be held accountable to every letter of that accord.

Till then, SL will appear to be the dishonourable nation that does not value its own words, let along the lives of its Tamil citizens.