Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Talk your shit to USA , ask Bush and Obama why they did not follow International laws.China always using historical claim. This is the 20th century, you can use history but to claim what is you thought was yours before is totally BS. War changes the face of the earth many times. Unless China wanted to start one, then let it be and hope China will be the same after that.
That is why nations need international laws to follow.
Philippine claims are based on UNCLOS stupid dimwit. Historical records not recognized by the international community remains a fiction.. wake up...go to school and let your mind evolve... you're just too fed up by your Commie government.
Even Heilongjiang province and Xijiang are not on this map .Strongly agree with you.
China has only big mouth . The historical evidences are not on their side. So, they are very afraid of the international court.
This is a Chinese map published by the Shanghai Publishing House, in the Qing Dynasty.
On the map, Where is the Paracel Islands, Spratly Islands? Where is so-called "nine dotted line"?
China always using historical claim. This is the 20th century, you can use history but to claim what is you thought was yours before is totally BS. War changes the face of the earth many times. Unless China wanted to start one, then let it be and hope China will be the same after that.
That is why nations need international laws to follow.
Philippine claims are based on UNCLOS stupid dimwit. Historical records not recognized by the international community remains a fiction.. wake up...go to school and let your mind evolve... you're just too fed up by your Commie government.
In fact, territories are mostly decided by historical claims. Otherwise, tell me what's the basis of you occupying the Philipines islands? Because your ancestors were born there or because a UN document says so? Of course, historical claims could be decided by continual occupation, war, treaties, etc. Majorities of land demarcation are based on historical occupation, discoveries. UN treaties cannot nullify historical claims and thus re-demarcate borders. Most laws do not have retroactive effect.
What's considered international community? Shall we vote to decide each territorial dispute? Is the whole world a democracy at large? Shall a tiny country like Brunei have equal voting power as a country with billion population, thus, making one Brunei person's voting power worth 10000 times than a Chinese or an Indian?
Isn't that what the US is which is also part of the P5? Above the law, accuse Iraq of making weapons of mass destructions and invade that country. Now where's the law? Since you are begging Uncle Sam you don't see anything wrong with what the US did as long you think Uncle Sam is to help you contain China.you are above the laws? China as lawless country?
I know that viet can't designThe new ship is complited, designed by Holland company.
The boat was sunk 17nm from the rig. China one-sided bans all Vietnam vessels in a 10nm radius around the rig. Either ways China is wrong. You take self-defence to a new level. One day you will start a war in the name of self-defen.. oh wait, you already did.Dont try to attack Chinese civilian vessels with your "innocent civilian fishing boats" around Chinese territorial waters.
Then you dont need to cry about "aggressive" Chinese chasing you away.
Are you Chinese ?
I could say, no civilian vessels have the right to legally ram to sink other civilian vessel. That's murder.
And everyone could point out that the site is not belong to any country territorial water.
Or Chinese consider The Oil Rig has it own territorial water and EEZ ? Is it a new tool for Chinese neo-imperialism ?
At least the japs acknowledge these facts. The dirty viets claim China stole their culture.Japanese and Chinese share similar DNA haplo. Japanese acknowledged that it learnt and borrowed a lot from Chinese culture.
Too technical for pinoys and lil' jungle men to comprehend. Lol.Yeah, no.
UNCLOS and Agreement on Part XI - Preamble and frame index
"Article 298
Optional exceptions to applicability of section 2
1. When signing, ratifying or acceding to this Convention or at any time thereafter, a State may, without prejudice to the obligations arising under section 1, declare in writing that it does not accept any one or more of the procedures provided for in section 2 with respect to one or more of the following categories of disputes:
(a) (i) disputes concerning the interpretation or application of articles 15, 74 and 83 relating to sea boundary delimitations, or those involving historic bays or titles, provided that a State having made such a declaration shall, when such a dispute arises subsequent to the entry into force of this Convention and where no agreement within a reasonable period of time is reached in negotiations between the parties, at the request of any party to the dispute, accept submission of the matter to conciliation under Annex V, section 2; and provided further that any dispute that necessarily involves the concurrent consideration of any unsettled dispute concerning sovereignty or other rights over continental or insular land territory shall be excluded from such submission;
(ii) after the conciliation commission has presented its report, which shall state the reasons on which it is based, the parties shall negotiate an agreement on the basis of that report; if these negotiations do not result in an agreement, the parties shall, by mutual consent, submit the question to one of the procedures provided for in section 2, unless the parties otherwise agree;
(iii) this subparagraph does not apply to any sea boundary dispute finally settled by an arrangement between the parties, or to any such dispute which is to be settled in accordance with a bilateral or multilateral agreement binding upon those parties;
(b) disputes concerning military activities, including military activities by government vessels and aircraft engaged in non-commercial service, and disputes concerning law enforcement activities in regard to the exercise of sovereign rights or jurisdiction excluded from the jurisdiction of a court or tribunal under article 297, paragraph 2 or 3;
(c) disputes in respect of which the Security Council of the United Nations is exercising the functions assigned to it by the Charter of the United Nations, unless the Security Council decides to remove the matter from its agenda or calls upon the parties to settle it by the means provided for in this Convention."
Next, please.
At least the japs acknowledge these facts. The dirty viets claim China stole their culture.
Too technical for pinoys and lil' jungle men to comprehend. Lol.
You have to understand smaller, weak countries can only cry, beg and play victim. P5 countries should just ignore it, the incident will pass through in a week. Bringing it up plays in their favor.It felt like I have said this a thousand times. What exactly do these people feel that they are going to accomplish trying to sue a major nation, one that is a member of the permanent security council and one of the big three, at UN? You think that when major nations, the one that made the convention in the first place, won't leave loophole for themselves to use? Please, international charters haven't protected weak nation against strong ones since the dawn of human history.
In fact, it was only with the rise of China that East Asia has a relatively peaceful major power and the threat of this power kept the region peaceful against invaders from the other parts of the world.
The Philippine government does it because it is a gesture. One that is designed to show US that yes, they are on their side in their conflict with China. It wasn't mean to accomplish anything.