AUz
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2010
- Messages
- 8,595
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
China is actually the one supplying the slave labor. Not Japan and Korea.
haha..ok, if that makes you feel good.
Btw, Chinese economy is larger than Japan/Korea combined....AND Chinese achieved it WITHOUT being 'slaves' of western masters...
In fact China looked up to Japans success and how it became the second largest economy, and tried to emulate it.
So?
Human beings learn from eachother..thats no biggy.
Western world emulated Arabs in alot of ways...cuz back then, Arabs had their sh!t together. Today, other people emulate Western models of success etc.
Btw, South Koreans emulated Pakistani economic model of 1960's
The US controlled Germany for some time and implemented economic plans as they did in Japan.
Even without it, Germany would've been a great economic power..just like it always was.
And yet most Arabs agree US meant to overthow Gadaffi who for years was against American interest, as with Assad.
Either way more chaos in the Arab world. Armed rebel groups fighting one another, civil strife.
Arabs over-threw dictators..simple as that. Mubarak and western honey-son Ben Ali were overthrown even before Gadafi..
Revolutions are always followed by violence, civil strife...
I disagree, the cycle will repeat because it is culture. Arabs have Emirs and kings. Thus far most have been willing to sell out to the US or Russians.
Even if Arabs get emirs and kings, they won't be western lackeys as Mubarak or Ben Ali were...Arab Spring has changed this forever...
Arab World will have a good working relationship with West..just like Turkey has. But no one is willing to be servant of west (talking about Arabs in general..not their sell-out rulers like Mubarak or Ben Ali were etc)..
Just like how you have a lot in common with Indians in terms of language, family structure, food, etc - same applies to all regions of the world. East Asian countries at times have been part of one another hence the cultural closeness.
Dont deny the obvious.
Yet they aren't one civilization as you claimed.
Also, North-Western india is close to Pakistan. South or East India is not...not by even one parameter.
Which Islamic empire won over China? China was never under muslim rule from my understanding, please enlighten me.
No one said that Islamic Empire won "over" China...
Here's is a good starter for you ..
Battle of Talas
Battle of Talas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yes there is. Why else would Arabs, Turks, Iranians argue over which empires were theirs, who contributed what, and which race is superior. Why else do you think Mustafa Kemal removed Persian and Arab words from the language?
Nationalism. Absolute normal.
It doesn't imply a hierarchy in Islam. None of the above mentioned claim to be superior Muslims...Every race is self-centered and claims to be superior than others...
C'mon, don't make a fool out of yourself.
That was a local culture - not an empire like the Turkic, Arab ones I meant. Not did it shape history like theirs did.
Ottoman Empire shaped history b/c it conquered European lands..and hence for you, a Westerner, Ottoman Empire is more relevant...
But it doesn't mean that it was relevant to Pakistan too. Pakistani history is shaped due to other regional empires/factors/forces..about which you have no idea. So just quit it.
Before coming to West, I had no idea of who Caesar was...b/c he was/is completely irrelevant to me and my surroundings.
I don't even know why are you arguing this?