What's new

Sharif rakes up Kashmir, hails Burhan Wani as 'young leader' !!!!

Indika

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2015
Messages
3,327
Reaction score
-10
Country
India
Location
India
When ppl with guns become leaders, then violence will be the companion of society.
-----
Sharif rakes up Kashmir, hails Burhan Wani as 'young leader'
By PTI

Published: 21st September 2016 11:54 PM

Last Updated: 22nd September 2016 01:41 AM

Email2
  • Sharif-AP.jpg

    Muhammad Nawaz Sharif Prime Minister of Pakistan speaks during the 71st session of the United Nations General Assembly Wednesday Sept. 21 2016 at U.N. headquarters. | AP
UNITED NATIONS: Raking up Kashmir at the UN, Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif today glorified slain Hizbul commander Burhan Wani as a "young leader" even as he expressed readiness for a "serious and sustained dialogue" with India for peaceful resolution of all outstanding disputes, especially Jammu and Kashmir.

Sharif devoted much of his 20-minute speech at the UN General Assembly session to Kashmir and the current situation in the valley and said Pakistan "fully supports the demand of the Kashmiri people for self-determination".

He demanded an "independent inquiry into the extra- judicial killings" and a UN fact-finding mission to Kashmir "so that those guilty of these atrocities are punished."

Insisting that peace and normalisation between Pakistan and India cannot be achieved without a resolution of the Kashmir dispute, Sharif made a number of allegations with regard to the current unrest in the valley. India has blamed Pakistan for engineering and fuelling the unrest.

While talking about the situation in Kashmir, the Pakistan Prime Minister referred to Wani, who was killed in an encounter with security forces on July 8, as a "young leader" and said he has "emerged as the symbol of the latest Kashmiri Intifada, a popular and peaceful freedom movement..."

Sharif said the "Indian brutalities are well documented" and that "Pakistan will share with the Secretary General a dossier containing detailed information and evidence of the gross and systematic violations of human rights committed" in Jammu and Kashmir.

"The Security Council has called for the exercise of the right to self-determination by the people of Jammu and Kashmir through a free and fair plebiscite held under UN auspices. The people of Kashmir have waited 70 years for implementation of this promise," he said, adding the Security Council must honour its commitments by implementing its own decisions.

Sharif, who spoke amid heightening tensions between India and Pakistan, insisted that his country wants peace with the neighbour as "confrontation should not be our destiny in South Asia."

The Pakistan Prime Minister claimed that he had "gone the extra mile to achieve this, repeatedly offering a dialogue to address all outstanding issues but India has posed unacceptable preconditions to engage in a dialogue.

"Let us be clear: talks are no favor to Pakistan. Talks are in the interest of both countries. They are essential to resolve our differences, especially the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, and to avert the danger of any escalation."

While insisting that peace and normalization between Pakistan and India cannot be achieved without a resolution of the Kashmir dispute, he said, "This is an objective evaluation, not a partisan position."

"Today, from this rostrum, I would also like to reiterate our offer to India to enter into a serious and sustained dialogue for the peaceful resolution of all outstanding disputes, especially Jammu and Kashmir," Sharif said.

He also said that Pakistan was "open to discussing all measures of restraint and responsibility with India, in any forum or format and without any conditions."

Pakistan is "ready for talks to agree on a bilateral nuclear test ban treaty," he added.

Claiming that Pakistan "neither wants, nor is engaged in an arms race with India", Sharif said, "We have consistently urged the conclusion of bilateral arms control and disarmament measures between Pakistan and India to prevent conflict and avoid wasteful military expenditures."

"The international community ignores the danger of rising tensions in South Asia, at its own peril," the Pakistan Prime Minister said.

He said Pakistan is "committed to the establishment of strategic stability in the region" but "we cannot ignore our neighbor’s unprecedented arms build up and will take whatever measures are necessary to maintain credible deterrence."

Sharif, while speaking about the unrest in Kashmir, said, "We demand the immediate release of all Kashmiri political prisoners; an end to the curfew; freedom for the Kashmiris to demonstrate peacefully; urgent medical help for the injured; abrogation of India’s draconian ‘laws’; and removal of the foreign travel ban on Kashmiri leaders."

To this end, he said, "steps should be taken by the United Nations to de-militarize Jammu and Kashmir and undertake consultations with India, Pakistan and the true representatives of the Kashmiri people to implement the resolutions of the Security Council."

In this context, Sharif said he welcomes "the offer of good offices by Secretary General Ban Ki-moon."

India has always maintained that Kashmir is a bilateral issue and not third party, including the UN, has any role.

"We will also open consultations with members of the Security Council to explore the modalities for implementation of the Security Council resolutions on Kashmir," Sharif said.

He claimed that Pakistan is the "principal victim of terrorism including that supported, sponsored and financed from abroad" and has the resolve of eliminating the scourge.

"Our comprehensive strategy of law enforcement and targeted military operations has produced remarkable results and enabled Pakistan to turn the tide against terrorism," he said.

Sharif also made a pitch for Pakistan's membership of the Nuclear Suppliers' Group, claiming that it is a "responsible" nuclear weapon state.

"As a responsible nuclear weapon state, Pakistan will continue to cooperate with all international efforts that seek to promote fair and equitable solutions to disarmament and non-proliferation challenges," he said.

"We have introduced ‘state of the art’ measures to strengthen the safety and security of our nuclear materials and facilities. We have adopted a comprehensive export control regime that is fully consistent with international standards," the Pakistan Prime Minister said.

"Judged on the basis of objective criteria, and without discrimination, Pakistan is fully eligible for membership of the Nuclear Suppliers' Group," he said.

Sharif also talked about Afghanistan, which earlier alleged that "merciless" terror attacks against its civilians are being planned and organised in Pakistan which trains, equips and finances terror groups like Taliban and Haqqani network.

He said Pakistan has been "facilitating the process of reconciliation in Afghanistan" but "progress will be assured only when the Afghan parties themselves conclude that there is no military solution to the Afghan war."
 
. .
We offer Dialogue and you run away & blame Pakistan for uri attack without Evidence. This is Such non serious attitude of India and to divert the Attention of international media from human rights violations in Kashmir. Your own government is responsible for such unrest in Kashmir. You are playing with fire, and then you are blaming it to others.
3 months Curfew, Army doing violations of human rights using Pellet guns , as a result many are blind now, injured and 82+ died.
 
.
I was hoping he would be giving national Top honor , to Burhan Wani . For struggle to promote cause of his people in Kashmir. And also pay respect to his struggle for freedom

However nawaz was a bit Polite in UN meeting but he made good points

He emphasized the need for vote and UN to play its role

It was important that the issue of Kashmiri people was raised correctly and fairly , and Human Rights violations were mentioned briefly

If I were presenting the speech , my delivery would have been quite aggressive India was lucky to have a very soft speech from Nawaz sharif

Would rate the speech 3/10 in term of being aggressive

My preference would have been 15 out of 10 sorta speech (+5) above the 10 Mark
 
Last edited:
.
So when is Mr. Sharif planning on implementing the pre conditional steps to referendum because it seems the other side doesn't want to follow the UN resolution for referendum.
 
.
Pm nawaz sharif post the Kashmir case well ! Pakistan need to push it further to implement it

I was hoping he would be giving national Top honor , to Burhan Wani . For struggle to promote cause of his people in Kashmir. And also pay respect to his struggle for freedom

However nawaz was a bit Polite in UN meeting but he made good points

He emphasized the need for vote and UN to play its role

It was important that the issue of Kashmiri people was raised correctly and fairly , and Human Rights violations were mentioned briefly

If I were presenting the speech , my delivery would have been quite aggressive India was lucky to have a very soft speech from Nawaz sharif
How u know how pressurised he was to do so! It all well ,take whatever u can give nothing back :D
 
.
So when is Mr. Sharif planning on implementing the pre conditional steps to referendum because it seems the other side doesn't want to follow the UN resolution for referendum.

There would be a war 100% if no referendum is done

There is no other way to look at issue , the people are there , let UN come do voting and then mind your own businesss.

Otherwise all options will be open

You have to see the problem
  • Azad Kashmir has no problem (People living life )
  • Problem is Indian Occupied Kashmir (Requires vote)

So either we will take the chance to discuss freedom of Kashmiri people by means of vote for the Kashmiri people , or I do suggest start building bunkers
 
. . . .
It is not for anyone to decide , he represents Kashmir (Burhan Wani) people , and his peers. At some point "SANE" reality has to be accepted , look it is 70-80 years ppl don't want to reside with India get over it. Kashmiri people openly wish to join Pakistan

We did all we could (United Nation) , by being quite honest just do the vote and get it over with. Stop dragging us , it is 2016 get the voting done and save your self the hassel and us

If India wants to beat the bush around , it won't change the problem

But we will not allow Human Rights Violations to happen
  • Reported to OIC
  • Reported to UN

The issue is only an issue becasue some Indian politicians sold this idea , in 1947 we will take the region drop our military and then over time people will forget the issue however people have no forgotten the issue.
 
Last edited:
.
Okay, good luck with the future war plan, if that is the case neither side gets anything but the valley would surely be a nuclear wasteland

Musharraf formula is best one I can think...Don't know what others are thinking to resolve this once and for all.....
 
. .
It is not for anyone to decide , he represents Kashmir (Burhan Wani) people , and his peers. At some point "SANE" reality has to be accepted , look it is 70-80 years ppl don't want to reside with India get over it

We did all we could (United Nation) , by being quite honest just do the vote and get it over with. Stop dragging us , it is 2016 get the voting done and save your self the hassel and us

If India wants to beat the bush around , it won't change the problem

But we will not allow Human Rights Violations to happen
  • Reported to OIC
  • Reported to UN
Okay then please why has Pakistan been beating around the bush and not full filling the initial required steps for a referendum to happen. You have had 60 years to complete the initial required steps yet nothing happened.
 
.
Okay then please why has Pakistan been beating around the bush and not full filling the initial required steps for a referendum to happen. You have had 60 years to complete the initial required steps yet nothing happened.

We will not be moving our forces back , becasue Azad Kashmir has no "Movement for freedom happening" if that is what you are referring to

The conflict is in Jamu & Kashmir , people in Azad Khasmir are enjoying life

Why on god given earth would Pakistani forces move out of the Area we freed ? Just so that Indian military can also setup bases on other side ?

  • Election can only happen once UN visitors can setup polling booths and in last 70 years India has turned the chapter many times refusing to allow any visitors
  • Issue them their entry and let them administer the process and I am sure buildup can be reduced naturally
getty_rf_photo_of_woman_with_toothache.jpg


If the problem is on one side (Indian side (left tooth) , people are dieing and Human Rights violation) why would I have surgery on the Pakistani side which has no tooth ache

If Indian politician will say , well you can only fix the tooth on left , if I agree to remove 10 teeth in right side ? I would call him stupid. You dragged us 70 year into this mess just becasue you could not let these folks vote

I know exactly how indian politicians think


3 Military interventions
  • Hyderabad (Military force to take land from Nizam)
  • Kashmir (Military force again , to not allow people to merge with Pakistan)
  • Attack on Portugal (Goa outpost)

Then war with China 1962
Then war with Pakistan 1965
Then war again with Pakistan 1971
More military problem with Sikh movement 1980's

See when politicians (India) mainly feel they can control people by means of "War" then that is the only language they understand


That is what I state what Nawaz Sharif conveyed was quite "Friendly neutral" invite to resolve issues , if it was me I have a more realistic perspective
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom