Kiarash
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2008
- Messages
- 451
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Good job mates Hollywood will be so proud
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This would be the 3rd video I've seen, their could be more I missed. Ironically Stingers have an easier chance against Russian Kalibrs than they do of this drone for simple IIR reasons. Simple often worksNot the first time their MANPADS have missed and been caught on camera..... it should also be noted that each Stinger missile costs around $120,000.... while the Shahed 136 costs perhaps $20,000...... so even if they shoot it down, they still lose
They hate them so much, they only use them everyday, and still continue to receive shipments. Totally no infrastructure damage.Yeah they shoot them down with their military and power infrastructure. Given the amount of videos I've seen of Shahed's hitting their targets, and so few videos of them being shot down. I'm inclined to believe the Pentagon has found Zelensky's cocaine stash.
$20k lawnmower > $500k AD missile
From what I've seen in the videos, usually when a SAM strikes the drone, it completely obliterates it.U.S. has viewed wreckage of kamikaze drones Russia used in Ukraine
The U.S. government has examined the wreckage of Iranian-made drones shot down in Ukraine, deepening its insight into the unmanned craft that Russia has launched in a spate of kamikaze attacks on the country’s critical infrastructure, according to two U.S. officials.
Information about the drones’ structure and technology could prove crucial in helping the United States and its Ukrainian allies better identify and ultimately defeat them before they can reach their targets. Officials said the process has been used in the past to study weaponry deployed by Iran’s proxies in conflicts in the Middle East. People interviewed for this report spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence collection.
True about, remember when the Saudis and American put Iranian made weapons on display at the UN, but I highly doubt much information and out the hundreds probably fired most likely several didn’t explode again I don’t have any information regarding that other than there’s always a percentage of failures during military operation, say 97% and 3% failed still an A but nothing is perfect. Also I wanted to add why don’t they paint them all black for nighttime operationsFrom what I've seen in the videos, usually when a SAM strikes the drone, it completely obliterates it.
Best case is downing via AA, where the wreckage can be recovered, but this is all old news. Wreckages were retrieved in Yemen/Saudi Arabia in the past, so this is nothing new for the Americans. But I guess many don't know that in mainstream media.
Good example caught on video.Not the first time their MANPADS have missed and been caught on camera..... it should also be noted that each Stinger missile costs around $120,000.... while the Shahed 136 costs perhaps $20,000...... so even if they shoot it down, they still lose
Is it good to be involved in the war this much?This would be the 3rd video I've seen, their could be more I missed. Ironically Stingers have an easier chance against Russian Kalibrs than they do of this drone for simple IIR reasons. Simple often works
View attachment 888059
Since it is related to Shahed-136. I mention it here.
Americans believe since Russia earlier had problems in operating the systems they have received likely due to rushed training, Iranians were sent to Crimea to provide on-site support and assist them (which is probably not far from the truth). Including using them directly on behalf of Russia, including orchestrating what was a successful attack on Ukrainian energy management building in Kiev on Monday. Kiev is a well protected city, and cruise missiles of Kalibr type would not have an easy time penetrating the city given its launch signature, IR signature and tracking is not difficult for Nato satellites. By this point NATO should have a good idea of the flight path they use these missiles and have setup air defences in the appropriate coordinates. Only Iran could have a good enough understanding of their own drones to help them avoid them.
After the strike, Ukraine noted that several regions of Ukraine lost power.
If the rumours of transfer of ballistic missiles is true, the handling, and operation of these missiles is not something you can learn very quickly. Let alone use them accurately. Therefore, the only possible explanation of the use of these missiles in the next few weeks would be that Iranians themselves set them up for Russia.
High risk, high reward for Iran. Fun fact, last time their was a Iranian/Persian military presence in Crimea was in 513 BC, under Darius the Great, 2535 years ago. What a time to be alive.
Probably not, but I think from their eyes, it is essential to change some parameters of this war in Russia's favor. Complete loss is not tolerable. The benefits of lend-lease to Iran's industry + testing would be worth the cost.Is it good to be involved in the war this much?
We are not involved.Is it good to be involved in the war this much?