Ayush
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2012
- Messages
- 7,805
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Sharukh Khan is not a "Khan".
He is a slave of the Hindus. Khan's were not slave of Hindus. They ruled Hindus. Unfortunately, this Sharukh has brought disgrace to the name "Khan".
Thank the Lord he is not pure blood, and rather a mixed blood coward.
he does rule bollywood and many hindu fans.
your logic would have been applicable in 18th century,not 21st century.
you should learn to catch up with time.
Sharukh Khan is not a "Khan"-this statement of yours contradicts you.you yourself referred to him as a khan.