What's new

Security Council reform with permanent seat for India is 'urgent', says France

Good. Think about that the next time you cry about the UN resolution on Kashmir.

LMAO Heck, join the group of irrelevant lackeys. Sit at the table and masturbate all day long for all I care. The last time I checked the biggest sponsor of UN waged a unilateral war without consulting anybody... So much for the UN and its usefulness...

It's amazing baffling how International Superpowers overlook the rift between Pakistan and India completely when it comes to such sensitive decisions like this one?
india-pakistan-border-fighting-intensifies-before-obama-kerry-visit-altagreer-english.gif

They only see interests... It blinds them. Short-sightedness has its price. A very hefty one I can confess.
 
.
Atleast two members from Muslim World must also be added on P5, along with African, Latin American, and Indian representation.

You don't have to choose one member. OIC can rotate its "representing" members on the Permanent Security Council.

Without balancing the power distribution in world, there can't be any peace.
As a second largest Muslim population you can consider India as there representative....:D
 
.
As a second largest Muslim population you can consider India as there representative....:D

But is not the member of OIC :) So.....don't be over-smart.
 
.
The only thing that UN need urgently is the abolition of veto power . All the other things have far less priority .
 
. .
If you think about it, no arms purchase between two countries takes place without significant political alignment between the two...
Don't see why this should be any different...

that means it doesnt have any significance then for a mere $3.6 billion contract

Otherwise Egypt should be eligible for a UNSC permanent seat too
Qatar is 2 times more qualified than India as it is going to fork out $7 billion for their deal without fanfare

When is the term of office that the French guy ended?

images

Art of Paper Folding China
 
. . .
China will always veto Japanese or Indian membership of the UNSC. So it will never happen.

Keep dreaming India.
Nobody gives a shyt what insignificant country like China Say,Japan is a world power without UNSC membership we will be the same
 
. . .
But is not the member of OIC :) So.....don't be over-smart.
If UN is irrelevant so is OIC. How can you have an islamic council without including second largest muslim populated country?

China will always veto Japanese or Indian membership of the UNSC. So it will never happen.

Keep dreaming India.
No....It will not....
 
.
If UN is irrelevant so is OIC. How can you have an islamic council without including second largest muslim populated country?


No....It will not....

Yes we will, China will always veto Indian and Japanese membership.

India is in a different league

No its not. India is a borderline failed state.
 
.
Yes we will, China will always veto Indian and Japanese membership.
China cannot or will not stand against every other member of the world especially publicly if there is vote for expansion. it will be blunder for them as they will loose their face. Behind the doors yes may be but not in open
 
.
The UN body is irrelevant. No one cares about or listens to the UN. It serve no purpose other than meaningless bureaucracy.
I'm glad Pakistan getting its official line in place for when India gets its permeant seat on the UNSC :whistle:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom