No I don't want to read "peer reviews/commentaries" or what you call them from the same source. Are there western commentaries accepting your POV?
lol..... how are these from the "same source" ? they are from different sources, written by his peers and other scholars of the ages.
His best peer review comes from Newton who plagiarized his work under the cover of colonialism
Disagree. The words Anu and Atom have completely different etymologies
There is reason I asked specifically asked about positron
Judge your yourself what is a positron,
In the Vaisesika Sutra there are nine classes of substances, some of which are non-atomic, some atomic, and others all-pervasive. The non-atomic ground is provided by the three substances of ether (akasa), space (dik), and time (kala), which are unitary and indestructible; a further four, earth (pṛthvi), water (apas), fire (tejas), and air (vayu) are atomic composed of indivisible, and indestructible atoms (aṇu); self or consciousness (atman), which is the eighth, is omnipresent and eternal; and, lastly, the ninth, is the mind (manas), which has atomic dimensions.
Let the basic atoms of pṛthivi, apas, tejas, and vayu be represented by P, Ap, T, and V, respectively. The eternality of the atoms is true only under normal conditions, and during creation and destruction, the atoms arise in a sequence starting with akasa and absorbed in the reverse sequence in the end of the world.
The sequence of evolution of the elements is given as V→T→Ap→P.
The V and T atoms are without mass, whereas P and Ap atoms have mass.
It is significant that consciousness is listed before mind, suggesting that it is the medium through which mind’s apprehensions are received. The atoms of earth, water, fire and air are different and this difference arises out of the different ways the fundamental atom of materiality combines with itself in different arrangements.
In other words, Kanada foresaw the emergence of chemistry from physics.