This isn't a true measure of scientific development, innovation, and advancement at all. This ranking system is very misleading. It's criteria of scientific documents published, citations, and other academic material. This is no way is a valid and accurate assessment of a country's scientific advancement. On this system ranking you could be the number one ranked country and yet still suffer with actual low scientific and technological achievement.
It can be difficult to assess and measure true scientific advancement, but there are methods of determining that, and one is actual scientific output on the basis of knowledge and information scientifically proven and discovered, technological advancement, and other methods.
Overall, this is a misleading ranking system that doesn't accurately measure true scientific output and achievement. It looks for secondary marks hinting at scientific progress but not actual core and primary marks indicating scientific progress.