What's new

Saudi U.N. envoy demands permanent Security Council seat for Arabs

That's the beauty of middle east , and the 90s , otherwise if Israel was in india you would have raped them in the blink of an eye.

?? Can u plz elaborate??
In any case, Israel doesn't qualify as a UNSC permanent member in present structure of UN. But they have many notable contributions in science & technology, that other ME countries don't have.
 
Last edited:
There should be no permanent seat on the Security Council for Arabs !

Why! you have no right to object.

On what basis should they get one ?

On the basis that the Arab region is the most paralyzed spot in the world where the UN double standers and the constant use of the Veto that only been used against Arabs since the UN establishment contributed more to this turmoil. Take two things example;

1-Palestine case vetoed against by the US multiple times
2-Syira crisis vetoed against by China once and Russia twice

So who is the victim here?

Because they are Muslims ?

No because we are arabs. This has nothing to do with muslims so please hold your horse.

We - the Non Arabs - are considerably more than them !

Good for you keep it up.

Because they are living in a Region with Issues ? Well welcome to our world !

Yes, since the UN failed to bear its responsibilities toward world issues mainly in the arab world we left with one option only, hear us or fu@ck the UN. we will play against the world interests economically and geo-politically so expect us.

Because they are Arabs ? That doesn't mean a thing ! Otherwise every Ethnicity should get a seat on the Security Council because they belong to XYZ Ethnic Group !

Raise your voice and we will support you.

At any rate if a strong Muslim & Arab Voice is to be exercised then it should be under the framework of a strong Organization of Islamic Countries (not the neutered sh*t that it currently is) ! Strengthen the OIC & send an OIC Representative to the UNSC as a permanent member !

This has nothing to do with muslims again its all about the Arab league. Arab countries are mixed of different religions and ethnicities.

But it is only fair if ASEAN, SAARC, SCO & other such Organizations that represent the collective ambitions of a cluster of nation states should get a permanent seat on the UNSC as well !

Good luck, No one is against that at all.

That said, the best way to go forward would be to eliminate the UNSC altogether & instil a true democracy in the United Nations where all Nation-States are sovereign but equal under the laws & administrative precedents of the United Nations !

well said.
 
Last edited:
There should be no permanent seat on the Security Council for Arabs !

On what basis should they get one ?

Because they are Muslims ? We - the Non Arabs - are considerably more than them !

Because they are living in a Region with Issues ? Well welcome to our world !

Because they are Arabs ? That doesn't mean a thing ! Otherwise every Ethnicity should get a seat on the Security Council because they belong to XYZ Ethnic Group !

At any rate if a strong Muslim & Arab Voice is to be exercised then it should be under the framework of a strong Organization of Islamic Countries (not the neutered sh*t that it currently is) ! Strengthen the OIC & send an OIC Representative to the UNSC as a permanent member !

But it is only fair if ASEAN, SAARC, SCO & other such Organizations that represent the collective ambitions of a cluster of nation states should get a permanent seat on the UNSC as well !

That said, the best way to go forward would be to eliminate the UNSC altogether & instil a true democracy in the United Nations where all Nation-States are sovereign but equal under the laws & administrative precedents of the United Nations !
Because of the following:

1- They are 22 countries, 400 million population live in 13,333,296 km2 area.
2- Their combined GDP is $1.898 trillion.
3- They have about 40% of world oil and gas.
4- They have the holiest places for 1.5 bn Muslims.
5- they control most strategic positions that connect three continents together.
.....etc.

Do you have any of these?
 
It won't change anything, cameras being set up every corner in the country so therefore, is a colony of the US. Otherwise, Central Intelligence Agency will have their ambition to seek assassination if it does not suit the US interest then positioning a sold out sovereign government which suit the US ambition. Example provided for the successful and attempted assassination of Communist leaders who stepped in Soviet bandwagon and the important, tense and hear beating role of fooling the nephew of Faisal to use him behind the assassination then replacing the perfect type who was Khalid to cut of the oil embargo imposed by Faisal. First and Fourth more, Central Intelligence Agency is well expertises to step in politically behind coups to benefit their interest and to prevent an anti Western government from taking full sovereign of the country and that is the mighty and the most useful tool is the third world military generals known as supporter of dictatorship that US export military aids to ensure they stay in power and providing monarchies their gift boost extensively of the economic wealth to ensure it does not alarm their citizens from seeing their kingdom of being a puppet that greets Uncle Sam's policy which forcefully themselves to secure the oil facilities.

Let's be honest here, defining the Middle East is nothing because it includes Jordan, Syria and Israel which is useless but preferable calling Iraq and the Gulf states which is not some random region but extremely useful to serve the agendas of the West and to ensure safety of the oils. Nevertheless I say, let them say whatever they want since they are some bunch of clueless people who will simply be either assassinated or toppled if they switch their policies aggressively but I'm afraid that they will be panicked who sees the histories of CIA's successful operation or are they trying to be Saddam Hussein?
No, you can't do any of these. Saddam was crazy and Gulf Arabs wanted him down, so you were allowed to do so. GCC are no Communist countries nor Iraq dear, they hold you from your balls, they can withdraw their $1.5 trillion of investments from the US to destroy your already crimpling economy, they can cut off oil and sky rocket it's prices and bring your economy down. Away from the last two cards, they can just abandon dollar and sell oil with any other currencies.
 
There Arabs cannot resolve issue within them selves (Syria/Iraq/Egypt etc.)
Then how one should expect them to solve problems at global level

Even after this if a seat is allotted to Arabs then it would be disaster for the whole Middle East. These nations will fight within themselves for Sect, Power etc.
 
There Arabs cannot resolve issue within them selves (Syria/Iraq/Egypt etc.)
Then how one should expect them to solve problems at global level

Even after this if a seat is allotted to Arabs then it would be disaster for the whole Middle East. These nations will fight within themselves for Sect, Power etc.
All nations have troubles withen their borders but that don't make them inefficient. No matter how many problems Arabs have, thay have always been united in world arenas except for few cases.
 
Saudi U.N. envoy demands permanent Security Council seat for Arabs


La rainette qui se fait plus grande que le taureau...:omghaha:

8930289-personnage-de-dessin-anime-de-grenouille-happy.jpg


taureau1.jpg


 
Away from the last two cards, they can just abandon dollar and sell oil with any other currencies.
This is the most suicidal quote coming from the son of the father who was a fierce friend of Iraq during his reign and opposing the 91 Gulf war. Saddam attempted to do that, Uncle Sam taught him a lesson in 2003. If it weren't for the involvement in 1991 then the Gulf countries would be under occupied by Iraq. It's simple, Uncle Sam finished Iraq easily while Saudi Arabia had called for help internationally proving that they couldn't face Iraq alone yet you expect to change policy with the issues on oils? You're just delusional in a wet bed.
 
This is the most suicidal quote coming from the son of the father who was a fierce friend of Iraq during his reign and opposing the 91 Gulf war. Saddam attempted to do that, Uncle Sam taught him a lesson in 2003. If it weren't for the involvement in 1991 then the Gulf countries would be under occupied by Iraq. It's simple, Uncle Sam finished Iraq easily while Saudi Arabia had called for help internationally proving that they couldn't face Iraq alone yet you expect to change policy with the issues on oils? You're just delusional in a wet bed.
1991 era is so over dude, you're talking about this GCC now:

GCC AIR FORCE

And BTW you are the one who convinced Kuwait to establish your military there after they had refused for months although they were sure about Saddam invasion, they only accepted after the invasion, the same went for Saudis.
 
Because of the following:

1- They are 22 countries, 400 million population live in 13,333,296 km2 area.
2- Their combined GDP is $1.898 trillion.
3- They have about 40% of world oil and gas.
4- They have the holiest places for 1.5 bn Muslims.
5- they control most strategic positions that connect three continents together.
.....etc.

Do you have any of these?

Assuming all of those figures are correct !

(i) The population that lives in those 22 countries is less than half the combined population that lives in Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan & Bangladesh !

(ii) That combined GDP that you've stated is less than the combined GDPs of Indonesia, Turkey, Malaysia, Pakistan & Iran ! Heck if you add our BLACK MARKET to the list our GDP alone would be nearly half the GDP of the entire GCC combined !

In fact forget about us that 1.8 trillion figure of 22 countries is less than the sole figures of UK, Russia & a little more than the figures of Mexico !

(iii) So they have a commodity they can sell - And ?

(iv) What does having the Holiest Places of 1.5 billion Muslims means in International Relations ?

(v) We control the Land Routes from the Persian Gulf to China ! The Indonesians & Malaysians are strategically placed in Oceania ! The Afghans have the keys to Central Asia & we, the Indians & the Bengalis along with them connect the Far East with Central Asia ! The Turks connect Asia to Europe !

So yes I do believe we have all of that & much more !
 
This is crazy and unfair. why not give UNSC permanent seats for Turks, Indo-Europeans in Asia, ASEAN etc. Eventually give permanent seats for everyone.

Regardless of the topic, I appreciate the unity of Arab countries. It is much needed in South Asia.
 
Why! you have no right to object.

Why have I no right to object ? My country is a member of the United Nations & any change in the make up of the UN is my business & therefore I'm perfectly entitled to object or support !

On the basis that the Arab region is the most paralyzed spot in the world where the UN double standers and the constant use of the Veto that only been used against Arabs since the UN establishment contributed more to this turmoil. Take two things example;

1-Palestine case vetoed against by the US multiple times
2-Syira crisis vetoed against by China once and Russia twice

So who is the victim here?

We have the same issues here ! Everyone has issues - the Africans in Rwanda did, the Bosnians in Bosnia-Herzegovina did...heck even the Latin Americans have issues !


No because we are arabs. This has nothing to do with muslims so please hold your horse.

You can be Martians for all its worth to me but what part about being 'Arabs' or 'Africans' or 'Punjabis' translate into 'thus we deserve a seat on the UN' !

Yes, since the UN failed to bear its responsibilities toward world issues mainly in the arab world we left with one option only, hear us or fu@ck the UN. we will play against the world interests economically and geo-politically so expect us.

Go ahead - Faisal had balls...your current breed does not !


Raise your voice and we will support you.

What do you think we've been whispering bed time stories on Kashmir in the ears of all & sundry for the past 65 years ?

This has nothing to do with muslims again its all about the Arab league. Arab countries are mixed of different religions and ethnicities.

They may but so what ?
 
Assuming all of those figures are correct !

(i) The population that lives in those 22 countries is less than half the combined population that lives in Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan & Bangladesh !

(ii) That combined GDP that you've stated is less than the combined GDPs of Indonesia, Turkey, Malaysia, Pakistan & Iran ! Heck if you add our BLACK MARKET to the list our GDP alone would be nearly half the GDP of the entire GCC combined !

In fact forget about us that 1.8 trillion figure of 22 countries is less than the sole figures of UK, Russia & a little more than the figures of Mexico !

(iii) So they have a commodity they can sell - And ?

(iv) What does having the Holiest Places of 1.5 billion Muslims means in International Relations ?

(v) We control the Land Routes from the Persian Gulf to China ! The Indonesians & Malaysians are strategically placed in Oceania ! The Afghans have the keys to Central Asia & we, the Indians & the Bengalis along with them connect the Far East with Central Asia ! The Turks connect Asia to Europe !

So yes I do believe we have all of that & much more !
Why do you pick random countries and involve them with you? :what: Man, religion doesn't gather countries, you can't join the UN because you just have the same religion, otherwise, Buddi and Christians can do the same. It doesn't make sense actually.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom