What's new

Sad shameful situation - student from India stalking white woman, why is this a pattern.

Pole vaulting experts are talking as if that slum Dhaka is some Dubai. Amit shah will push all lungis back to that termite country with sweet talk.

I don't have to believe in anything Modi tells me. I can see for my self with over 4 million cars sold and 170 million smartphone sales and with tax collection growing at over 20% reaching $700 billion and oh reserves reaching 600 billion.

Talking about auqaat, you better remember before you open your mouth that your whole country buys some 3000 new cars a year and less than 7 million smartphones. And you are one of the poorest population in which ever country you are. GOB can only muster $30 billion in revenue and you are saying you are paying India $50 billion. Either you are stupid or your government is pathetic. I think the former.

You are lucky that you are an LDC, for without it even your stitching factories will close. BBS numbers game will be out soon enough. You are like your cricket team, all hype no substance.


I mean if the entire world is discriminating against you, then I would suggest to look at yourself for the cause. Before you call others ugly, may be you should reflect on your ugliness within, that has become a challenge for the world.
Here is a prime example of a reborn troll. Boy comes on here with a new ID - seems knowledgeable about the forum - immediately starts bigging up the nation that sells millions of iPhones and cars yet has more beggars than the whole of Africa and starving millions goin to sleep with empty tummies yet he wants to relate mighty india as the next superpower? Go on Indian grow a pair and share with us your previous ID before you was reincarnated?
On topic one can’t just the WHOLE nation of the action of a few. It is concerning that the nationality seems to be regularly indian but no biggie
 
Here is a prime example of a reborn troll. Boy comes on here with a new ID - seems knowledgeable about the forum - immediately starts bigging up the nation that sells millions of iPhones and cars yet has more beggars than the whole of Africa and starving millions goin to sleep with empty tummies yet he wants to relate mighty india as the next superpower? Go on Indian grow a pair and share with us your previous ID before you was reincarnated?
On topic one can’t just the WHOLE nation of the action of a few. It is concerning that the nationality seems to be regularly indian but no biggie
I suggest you to look at the reality at the present and then you'll realize who goes to bed empty stomach. Anyways enjoy PDF.
 
I suggest you to look at the reality at the present and then you'll realize who goes to bed empty stomach. Anyways enjoy PDF.
Come on pajeet - tell us who you was before you got reincarnated as a proteas? Come on be a man and share your old ID boy?
I understand you want to deflect about the starving 400 million - more than the whole of Africa because it burns deep inside you. Perhaps you ought to show them how to eat an iPhone?

Now back on topic - a few inbred Indians obsessed with bobs and vagina doesn’t mean the whole nation should be held accountable
 
Come on pajeet - tell us who you was before you got reincarnated as a proteas? Come on be a man and share your old ID boy?
I understand you want to deflect about the starving 400 million - more than the whole of Africa because it burns deep inside you. Perhaps you ought to show them how to eat an iPhone?

Now back on topic - a few inbred Indians obsessed with bobs and vagina doesn’t mean the whole nation should be held accountable
At least you are making sense on the topic. Other rants I shall ignore given this is PDF and you should at least have one space to grow your delusions. Ciao.
 
but at some level discrimination is an issue
atleast I felt it's an issue

Disrespect Bangladeshi people or Pakistani people,all you want that's your right but discrimination along relgious lines in the wider South Asian cammunity is a real issue in the west, you can't be like oh you guys are crazy and wear relgion on your sleeves etc etc
why is discriminating by national origin is acceptable but by religion or other criterion not?
or did I misunderstand you?
 
At least you are making sense on the topic. Other rants I shall ignore given this is PDF and you should at least have one space to grow your delusions. Ciao.
You ignore coz they are the truth - you got banned and the obsession is deep - created a new ID because you can’t hide your obsessions. How many IDs you had my
Little Indian?
Are you the actual Indian in the article? Is that why you couldn’t keep away from the thread? Stop harassing white bobs and Vagina
 

On the evening of September 7, 2021, Officer Sutton responded to a call in reference to suspicious activity. Upon arrival, he met the caller who stated she was being followed by a friend ("Ramesh"). She explained that the suspect had a history of contacting her despite her requests to stop.

Earlier that day, she told Officer Sutton that the suspect had called her and admitted to following her all day using a GPS tracker he had placed on her vehicle. He had said he felt bad about it and wished to remove the tracker. He had asked her to meet him at a gas station. At that point, she had called 911.

While Officer Sutton searched the vehicle for the tracker, Officer Nguyen located the suspect at the gas station and placed him under arrest once the GPS tracker had been located. The suspect was charged with Unlawful Surveillance (Felony) and Stalking (misdemeanor). He spent a week in jail before being released on a $11,000 surety bond.

So if you have Felony on your record, bye bye Green Card and of course US citizenship - as far as I know.

I don't know how stupid some people can get.
All child grooming gangs and stalkers should be kicked out of western countries .

I am grateful to the country for all the opportunities- who said I am not, I was talking about the prejudice of Indian community along religious lines carrying into North America

Am I complaining?- yeah I guess I am cause it's messed up, that's not how honorable people should act but does that stop people to be what they wanna be
absolutely not, hell nah to even suggest such a thing is laughable- but both are 2 different topics
Indians are successful and leading immigrants at every level in the western countries , nobody in the west is bothered except few failed pakistanis .
 
That's ok. I have still made through two masters degrees in US and had 15 years in IT with my meager english skills. I am still to learn English at chaddi stitching factory levels. 😂
How about saying you were wrong about 'part of the course' and moving on, without being so tiresomely defensive?

Clearly, you have superior examination skills and superior promotion-worthy qualities, and can manage without English. You shouldn't feel defensive about that one weak spot.
 
I respectfully disagree.

I believe in second chances and this event was in fact his second chance. The lady mentions in her conversation that this has happened before. A simple police report was made and he stopped bothering for about 2 years.

International students esp desi need to realize that they are coming here for a singular purpose. Yes, one can fool around but stalking people like that, engaging with minors, etc is unacceptable.

US law for students and visitors is VERY strict. Visas get canceled/revoked on something as small as shoplifting a low-value item while this act of stalking is a misdemeanor is much more serious.

These bad apples (all-inclusive - Pakistani, Indian, Bangladeshi...any SAs) give us a bad name and further damage our image as reasonable people.
You're wrong.

The bulk of Indians settled or long term resident in the US are the worst supporters of Hindutva, and offer a great deal of support to the elements back in India that are the worst. The support ranges from the cringe-worthy adulation of a known riot encouraging autocrat with a horrible record of public utterances and election-time incendiarism in his speeches to the active financial support of the Sangh Parivar. There are strong support organisations in the US for these regressive elements. The BJP, the VHP, various other bits and pieces, all get support. The last straw was the absolutely appalling campaigns against the efforts to balance textbooks in California, that was found objectionable by these more royalist than the King fanatics, and the latest campaign against caste discrimination laws, that pretend that there is no caste discrimination.

Don't waste your time feeling sorry for anyone.

OMG another MNL with another ID crisis :undecided:

View attachment 929199
Not again!

Is there some kind of pesticide that one can use against this particular kind of pseudo-history?

Strawman. It has nothing to do with what I posted which was in response to what you posted.
It has EVERYTHING to do with it. Grow up, and stop trotting out these mirror images of Hindutva bragging.
 
Last edited:
"Same country before the British gave us a new identity"

Meanwhile, this is how different communities interacted with eachother in pre-partition Punjab.

View attachment 929208
View attachment 929209
View attachment 929210
View attachment 929211
View attachment 929212
View attachment 929213

Source is from Ishtiaq Ahmed's "The Punjab Bloodied, Partitioned and Cleansed: Unravelling the 1947 Tragedy Through Secret British Reports and First-Person Accounts"
Idiot that I am, not to remember that he was not alone.

Congratulations, @hatehs, you've done your meaningful post of the thread. Well done.

Hindustan means land of the Indus. The geographical India existed and still does but is in Pakistan. The country India that uses the name does not exist.

So you're a Turk or an Indian Muhajir?
It does not.

You iil-informed numskull.

:sleep:



:cheesy: looks like someone doesn't know what genetics is lol
Looks like somebody doesn't know either history or sociology. LOL.

How can you be Bihari and Hindustani? Hindustan means land of the Indus. Do you not know where that is?
And on, and bloody on.

FYI Pakistani Y-chromomes are brought in from Sintashta and so are it's languages/
Y Chromosomes, yes, languages, no. Please take the trouble of doing a little homework before bursting into this extremely stupid type of post.
 
Last edited:
FYI Pakistani Y-chromomes are brought in from Sintashta and so are it's languages/
Y Chromosomes, yes, languages, no. Please take the trouble of doing a little homework before bursting into this extremely stupid type of post.
No, I just need one person to answer me logically and I will shut up:

Let me start with the declaration that I have no love for India or Indians, but what's the logic and point of these every other day "Person in India did this...did that..." posts

Like everything they do, Pakistanis do as well. Rape, stalking, murder, trying to meet minors, sexually frustrated and the list goes on.

Why do Pakistanis feel superior to Indians as a person (not country, economy, progress) and vice versa?

I want to understand what makes people think, "Oh yea, we too Pak for that shit"?

These are logical questions and people that have no answer just resort to childish behaviors with what they think are burns..
You happen to be one of the rational people in this discussion, so please don't get unsettled by the imbeciles attacking you with every false notion in their stupid armories of non-facts.

@Novus ordu seclorum as well - thanks for your contribution.

not quite brand new this one, has more than 1 ID
ronaq of the forum (likes to portray Pakistanis as ultra-haters)!
Seriously?
 
What's your point here? All you're proving is that the a British didn't create a new identity for us and that Pakistan is the product of an organic division between Muslims and non-Muslims.

Also, every single Muslim separatist leader from Pakistan was an Indian nationalist at one point in time. Sir Syed, Jinnah, Iqbal, GM Syed, etc you name them. They ended up drifting towards demanding rights for their own community AFTER encounters with Hindus and Sikhs. What does that tell you about which group saw the other as foreigners?
Take them one at a time.

Sir Syed Ahmed Khan had no negative contact with Hindus and Sikhs, but was a totally British worshipping individual, who concluded that the backwardness of his assumed community, considering Muslims to be one community throughout the length and breadth of India, compared to Hindus, not even Sikhs, pushed for education on western lines for Muslims. NOTHING to do with any adverse experience, although his speeches were filled with communal invective.

Jinnah found nothing wrong with Congress and the nationalist movement until he was displaced by Gandhi and his rather politically astute but uncomfortable assumption of a strong Hindu identity to bring out the 80% of Indians who lived in the villages and did not identify with the polished English-speaking memorialists who constituted the Congress until then. While he was personally admirable, his strategy was flawed at the root, and led to the dreadful condition of Pakistan today.

Iqbal had nothing again, no adverse experience with Hindus, apart from his own Hindu descent, that he shared with Jinnah. There is not a single instance of any of the three of them having had an unpleasant encounter either with a Hindu or with a Sikh.

I do not know enough about G. M. Syed, except that I find his being put into the Hindu-hating category very suspicious, considering the stand that he took on the constitution of the new country.

Your example is based on purely hot air.

Yes? The only reason the British facilitated elections was because Jinnah threatened civil war.
And the only reason that he threatened civil war was because the British actively encouraged him. Even on Direct Action Day, it took Suhrawardy, acting on the strength of the organised hoodlum element in Calcutta, to create trouble. There was nothing even remotely approaching that elsewhere.
 
I take it as part of the course and today I am one of the technical directors in my company.

Every PDF'er is a technical director of their own company somewhere in the US. Welcome to the club. :lol:
 
Yes they were. Read Ayesha Jalal's "the Sole Spokesman". The British wanted to ensure that the subcontinent was united after leaving because they wanted to prevent the USSR from taking over. The only thing that stopped them was the Muslim League.
That is precisely the wrong reading, and it is not surprising.

The British intensely distrusted Nehru's associations with the Bloomsbury Group, and with the kind of Fabian Socialism that was a popular theme then, and that the British establishment, including Churchill, distrusted deeply. It was for that reason that they fell back on backing the Muslim League, believing that an independent nation as half-heartedly hinted at by them would be more reliable in holding the line against the Soviets than India led by Nehru would be.

Every PDF'er is a technical director of their own company somewhere in the US. Welcome to the club. :lol:
I am SO sorry. I am sure there will be a positive turn to the situation if you persist.

An ulterior motive is not the same as being committed to giving people their rights...

Had they actually done the job proper, they would have drawn Kashmir lines before going so unrest will continue post-departure.
The clues are with you.

Why do you think that after the joint British-Dogra campaign against Chitral at the turn of the nineteenth century, when the Pamir Emirates were wiped out, and it was agreed that Gilgit would be annexed by the Dogras, the British insisted on taking the Gilgit region on 'lease' for an extended period, and renewed it once again before 1947, allowing the Dogras not even a look in during the entire period, except right at the end?

Why do you think that the leader of the mutiny of the Gilgit Scouts, Major Brown, got the highest decorations from both British and Pakistani sources, and was resettled in a comfortable insurance job in Calcutta after his little bit for the cause?

Without his effort, and without the assistance of the state forces of the Mehtar of Chitral, Gilgit was not part of Pakistan, there was a wazir in position (imprisoned by Brown and the mutinied Scouts), and Baltistan was wide open, until first Skardu and then Kargil were attacked by the combined forces?
 
Last edited:
Why do they have to be committed to giving people their rights? Stop shifting the goalposts.
There was no shifting of the goalposts. The British were committed to Pakistan before the Muslim League was committed to Pakistan. The Muslim League committed itself only after 10th July 1946; everything that was done to secure the components of the Pakistan to be was done by the British, particularly in Gilgit-Baltistan, long before there was the insistence on Pakistan, and insistence on partitioning the provinces of Punjab and Bengal.

Spoonfeed what? I can go back 1 page to see your comment. Lets replay it:

1) I said Muslim League threatened the British with civil war.
2) Your comment:

3) I reply saying that they wanted a united and stable subcontinent for strategic purposes
4) You start talking about people's rights.

Stop trying to die on this hill because you feel a bond with jahil illiterates on the other side of the border (like this monkey obsessed with me ---> @Kingdom come)
The only monkey obsessed with you is you.

I could have talked about toilets and other oddities, but I will digress.
🙏

Thank you.

Hindi and Indian mean of the Indus. After 1947 it has another meaning since another country adopted that name.
It does not.

If you had even a rudimentary grounding in history, you would not come out with this like a stuck record.

It's extinguishing building up a fictional history, isn't it?
Considering the damage you have done to yourself, that is hilarious.

Right all those genetic maps, archeological research, linguistic history were built in my own lab to hide some imaginary "South Asian race." I learned so much from you in the last 24 hours.
Not enough, sadly.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom