Russia's Strikes in Syria: Hitting All Targets With Pinpoint Accuracy

[bdslph]

The US' war strategy means winning hearts and minds, no matter how deceptively, US author Stephen Lendman stresses, praising Russia for waging a "real war on terror" in the Middle East.

© Sputnik/ Dmitriy Vinogradov
ISIL 'Frankenstein' Created by West and Its Gulf State Allies – French Political Analyst
Russia has evidently outpaced Washington in its war on terrorism in Syria, US author and syndicated columnist Stephen Lendman underscores.
"In over a year of Washington's phony war on ISIS [ISIL], they're stronger with more territory than when US bombing began — targeting Syrian and Iraqi infrastructure, not terrorist forces or facilities. On September 30, things changed markedly. Washington wants no interference in its policies. Putin's intervention leveled the playing field," Lendman noted in his article for Global Research.

Islamic State is now panicking and its insurgents are retreating. Some of them are hiding in residential areas and mosques, knowing that Russian airplanes will not launch strikes on noncombatants and civilian infrastructure, the US author added, citing Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov.

© Sputnik/ Igor Zarembo
Syrian Strikes: A Win for Russia Will be a Win for Syria and Middle East
However, there is the possibility that terrorists will jump at the opportunity to bomb civilian targets in order to shift the blame on Russia for their crimes. Needless to say, Western media would willingly report about such incidents — "spreading Big Lies is their specialty," the US author noted.
"War strategy includes winning hearts and minds, no matter how deceptively. Effective [US] propaganda works this way… blasting out Big Lies round-the-clock — in print, on air and online," Lendman remarked.

In just a week Russia destroyed 112 ISIL targets, including 19 command posts, 12 ammunition caches, 71 military hardware pieces and six explosive device making facilities.

"On Wednesday morning, 23 aircraft struck terrorist positions. Russia's navy is involved. Four warships fired 26 cruise missiles from Caspian Sea positions, 1,500 km away, hitting 11 targets with pinpoint accuracy, destroying them, harming no civilians, an impressive display of military might, perhaps enough to give Pentagon commanders pause on challenging Russia head-to-head, madness if dared," the columnist underscored.

© Sputnik/ Sergey Guneev
Iraqis Look to 'Hajji Putin' to Save Them From ISIL
Needless to say, Russia launched its cruise missiles which crossed the airspace of Iran and Iraq with their permission: the three countries are now cooperating closely in their war against terrorism.
In contrast to Washington's "phony war," Russian President Putin is waging real war against terrorism, Lendman emphasized, adding that the US "war on terror" has long transformed into an agenda for "conquest, domination, exploitation."

Interestingly enough, in response to Russia's consistent military strategy in Syria, other nations, previously "liberated" by Washington, are seeking Russia's help.


Read more: Russia's Strikes in Syria: Hitting All Targets With Pinpoint Accuracy

 

[mike2000 is back]

lol Sputnik. Enough said.

 

[bdslph]

the bombing is doing good as of now as they are targeting terrorist fixed places

 

[500]

This is Russia's most accurate weapon in Syria:

Su-34 with satellite guided KAB-500S. As u can see they have an accuracy of about 30 m and unable to hit even a huge building.

But the overwhelming majority of Russian strikes are carried by Su-24 and Su-25 with WW2 style dumb bombs OFAB-250-270:

 

[zzzz]

This is Russia's most accurate weapon in Syria:

Su-34 with satellite guided KAB-500S. As u can see they have an accuracy of about 30 m and unable to hit even a huge building.

But the overwhelming majority of Russian strikes are carried by Su-24 and Su-25 with WW2 style dumb bombs OFAB-250-270:

Unable to hit big building? What do you mean by that? You thought they were dropping fragmentation bomb on the roof of that building?

Moron, go find more appropriate forum for yourself. No need spam military-oriented community with your stupidity.

 

[500]

Unable to hit big building? What do you mean by that? You thought they were dropping fragmentation bomb on the roof of that building?

Moron, go find more appropriate forum for yourself. No need spam military-oriented community with your stupidity.

Video clearly shows that KAB-500S dropped from Su-34 missed their targets. Especially its clear in second strike where pilot first placed targeting mark on the building and bomb fell 30 m left to it. So then at second strike he moved targeting mark towards right in order to hit that building. If you cant understand that just shut up.

First attempt:

Second attempt:

 

[UKBengali]

Video clearly shows that KAB-500S dropped from Su-34 missed their targets. Especially its clear in second strike where pilot first placed targeting mark on the building and bomb fell 30 m left to it. So then at second strike he moved targeting mark towards right in order to hit that building. If you cant understand that just shut up.

First attempt:

Second attempt:

You do not understand the idea of CEP.

The Russian weapon has a CEP of 4-7 metres. What this means is that 50% of the time the bomb will
hit to within 4-7 metres of the aim point. This also means that 50% of the time it will hit outside this range
and so it is possible for the bomb to either be more or less accurate than the CEP. What we saw was a
highly rare occurrence where the bomb fell around 20-30 metres from the aim point. We have seen many other videos where the Russians scored direct hits on the targets.

At the end of the day, this is not the most advanced technology and easily within the reach of a country
like Russia.

 

[zzzz]

Video clearly shows that KAB-500S dropped from Su-34 missed their targets. Especially its clear in second strike where pilot first placed targeting mark on the building and bomb fell 30 m left to it. So then at second strike he moved targeting mark towards right in order to hit that building. If you cant understand that just shut up.

First attempt:

Second attempt:

LOL you even more stupid than i thought. WTF target mark has to do with sattelite guided bombs that are aimed to preprogrammed coordinates? Target mark cannt affect those bombs in any way after release, idiot.

 

[Schutz]

You do not understand the idea of CEP.

The Russian weapon has a CEP of 4-7 metres. What this means is that 50% of the time the bomb will
hit to within 4-7 metres of the aim point. This also means that 50% of the time it will hit outside this range
and so it is possible for the bomb to either be more or less accurate than the CEP. What we saw was a
highly rare occurrence where the bomb fell around 20-30 metres from the aim point. We have seen many other videos where the Russians scored direct hits on the targets.

At the end of the day, this is not the most advanced technology and easily within the reach of a country
like Russia.

Its the same reason the Russians fire multiple missiles at their targets, because its Russian made and some will usually fail ha

 

[500]

LOL you even more stupid than i thought. WTF target mark has to do with sattelite guided bombs that are aimed to preprogrammed coordinates?

Codes can be inserted during flight too. Seems thats how Russian satellite bombs are working: first u drop and see where it falls then u make corrections.

Target mark cannt affect those bombs in any way after release, idiot.

Video clearly shows otherwise. Operator had to move mark in order to hit the building.

I understand its very embarrassing and frustrating for u see how ur newest weapon is miserably missing huge targets. But try to not curse like jealous gf.

Here for u how modern air force is working:

 

[zzzz]

Codes can be inserted during flight too

Video clearly shows otherwise. Operator had to move mark in order to hit the building.

I understand its very embarrassing and frustrating for u see how ur newest weapon is miserably missing huge targets. But try to not curse like jealous gf.

Here for u how modern air force is working:

Coordinates inserted into the bomb only once. And most probably it was done even before aircraft take-off. Theres absolutly no reason to hold the target mark on targetting spot after coordinates inserted so the operator move the camera freely observing the site.

I understand its embarrassing for you that everyone can see your stupidity and that you dont even understand how sattelite guiding system work. But you have to deal with it.

 

[500]

Coordinates inserted into the bomb only once. And most probably it was done even before aircraft take-off. Theres absolutly no reason to hold the target mark on targetting spot after coordinates inserted so the operator move the camera freely observing the site.

I understand its embarrassing for you that everyone can see your stupidity and that you dont even understand how sattelite guiding system work. But you have to deal with it.

Whats the problem to reenter GPS coordinates as much as u wish? U never used GPS navigator in ur life? Video speaks for itself. Its very embarrassing thats why u are cursing like a girl.

 

[zzzz]

Whats the problem to reenter GPS coordinates as much as u wish? U never used GPS navigator in ur life? Video speaks for itself. Its very embarrassing thats why u are cursing like a girl.

I already said you should find more appropriate place for example Israeli home cooking forum. People there will be impressed with your story.

 

[500]

I already said you should find more appropriate place for example Israeli home cooking forum. People there will be impressed with your story.

Its your MoD says that it was satellite bombs and shows them too:

В провинции РАККА, контролируемой исключительно группировкой ИГИЛ, прямым попаданием высокоточных корректируемых авиабомб КАБ 500-С уничтожен штаб группировки формирования Лива-аль Хак.

 

[Godman]

This is Russia's most accurate weapon in Syria:

Su-34 with satellite guided KAB-500S. As u can see they have an accuracy of about 30 m and unable to hit even a huge building.

But the overwhelming majority of Russian strikes are carried by Su-24 and Su-25 with WW2 style dumb bombs OFAB-250-270:

The first strike was programmed with slightly inaccurate coordinates. The pilot corrected them during the second strike.
GLONASS is still slightly less accurate than GPS