Chinese-Dragon
RETIRED TTA
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 33,932
- Reaction score
- 52
- Country
- Location
First of all you wouldn't go for a co-development with a partner you can't trust, but more importantly, you have access to the same knowledge as Russia would have as well and that for a way more capable engine. So in the same time that you spend to develop an engine that is comparable to AL 31, you could have jointly developed an 117S and gained much more on the industrial side as well. Now you have an engine that AFAIK still is not satisfactory in performance (similar to RD93 counterparts) and have not the knowledge to improve it to NG level, to use it on your stealth fighters and that's the reason why the Su35 and Russia is important again, since a 5th gen fighter is more than just a stealth airframe, but includes advanced radars, avionics and ENGINES as well!
Firstly, if Russia didn't trust us then they wouldn't be offering to sell us a small number of Su-35's. Note the "small number" part which implies that the Su-35's are being bought to understand them rather than to use them as a proper force.
Secondly, if the Indian route regarding jet fighter technology is better than ours, then why is our fleet filled with all types of Chinese aircraft, including those equipped with WS-10A engines? While India still hasn't even inducted their "Light Combat Aircraft" yet?
I don't understand the logic? Why isn't it India that is shocking the world by concurrently developing TWO 5th-generation fighters at the same time (J-20 and J-31) while the ACMA is still just "on paper"?
I don't see how you can say your route is better when you still haven't even inducted the LCA, let alone anything else.