-SINAN-
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
- Messages
- 16,746
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Which is exactly what the article said. It never said he was one of Erdogan's bodyguard. Perhaps you should have actually read the article before making a foolish criticism of it.
"Mevlut Mert Altintas, 22, served on police details backing up Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s personal body guards"
Yeah, i noticed that now...still a very weird to put it up that way....backing Erdoğan's personal body guards by waiting in a bus outside the meeting area with hundreds of police ?
Nope.The point of the story is that this guy was in fact, a policeman who had worked VIP security details before.
I see really no point of discussing it any further. As you completely disregard what i have said and came with your own version. Feel free to believe in yourself.
So you can provide actual proof then that he did not ever, serve as police detail backing up the president's body guard?
Well, can you provide proof that he served ?
A riot police officer with the lowest rank, backing president's guards is like saying a mere private from US army whom joined recently, providing back up to CIA agents that are body guarding the US president.
But as i said earlier, feel free to believe that.
No, western media do not say things openly.Let's stick to the article you are criticising. Nowhere, does it even suggest that Turkey was behind, guilty, culpable, in any way, with the assassination. It simply states that the assassin was an actual police officer who had worked security details, previously. That is pretty much what I have been hearing about him in the Western news stories I have been following. I have yet to hear even one single story, that suggest Turkey was behind the assassination.
When ISIS conducts a terrorist attack, Western media refers them as Islamic Terrorists.
When PKK conducts a terrorist attack, Kurdish rebels. Despite PKK is a terrorist group that has been defined by EU, UN and US.
When US invades Iraq, and fights with natives, they don't say rebels but insurgents.
Western media, always implies things with their choice of words.