What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ukraine doesn’t have anywhere close to the firepower the US can bring.

Don’t know what your talking about. Ukraine has no navy and a very small Air Force. The US has 10,000+ cruise missile arsenal and several hundred thousand bombs. Not to mention the Army and Marine Corps.

P**** talk...your military or demented president don't have the guts to fight Russia.

Why send in US soldiers when the Ukrainians are obliterating the Russians for US? By the end of this war, the Russians will be an exhausted force.

The US has only given 30% of its Javelins, 25% of its Stingers, 100 towed howitzers, and less than 1,000 drones. US military support is only around $5B to date.

This is a very small portion of US firepower.

Yep, such a brave powerful military...getting someone else to be your cannon fodder :rofl: you're all mouth.
 
Last edited:
The US could have stayed in Afghanistan ad infinitum, but there was no need to. The US had already achieved its main objective of destroying Al Qaeda. Would we have liked to see the Taliban out of power? Sure, but that was up for Afghans to decide. If their not going to fight for their country, why would the US?

You didn't destroy Al Qaeda, in fact you created more monsters of the likes of ISIS. US invasion of Iraq was counterproductive to US interests. Iraq was effectively handed over to full control of the Iranians. You lost in Iraq and Afghanistan, you can spin it as much as you like, much like how you "won" in Vietnam :rofl:

Why would I not want to see the Russian Nazis destroyed?

By supporting Ukrainian Nazis? It's "good terrorist" vs "bad terrorist" all over again...you rednecks don't seem to learn do you?
 
Just like the rest I am sure Russia will destroy them too.
So you want Ukraine not to ask for military supplies, arms and help from its partners?
So when India and Pakistan went to war and Pakistan was seeking more western and Chinese help against India, it was also wrong for Pakistan to do so right?
Sometimes I wonder what kind of logic some of you here use..😅.

Countries will always ally with those they have common interests with and seek help when needed from those. In fact even big powers do this....much less smaller powers. Even Russia allied with the U.S/U.K/West to be able to fend off the massive German invasion/encroachment and they tried to make Japan neutral and sealed a deal with Japan to avoid being pincered and decimated from both sides.. you think Russia could have wistood both sides without Western help/alliance? Lol
The world doesn't work that way .
 
Last edited:
P**** talk...your military or demented president don't have the guts to fight Russia.



Yep, such a brave powerful military...getting someone else to be your cannon fodder :rofl: you're all mouth.
Russia has nukes.
This shields it. cause that 60 mile traffic jam near kiev would have been obliterated just like the highway of death in Iraq.

Nato has more military equipment, soldiers, population, tech, spending by a margin.
Its troops are also performing a lot better in wars, even far away from its border.
 
So you want Ukraine not to ask for military supplies, arms and help from its partners?
So when India and Pakistan went to war and Pakistan was seeking more westernand Chinese help against India, it was also wrong for Pakistan to do so right?
Sometimes I wonder what kind of logic some of you here use..😅.
Countries will.always ally with those they have common interests with and seek help when needed from those. In fact even big powers do this..much less smaller powers. Even Russia allied with U.S/U.K/West to be able to fend off the German invasion and they tried to sealed a deal with Japan to avoid being pincered and decimated from both sides.. you think Russia could have wistodd both aides without Western help/alliance? Lol
The world doesn't work that way .
LOL, I never said Ukr should not ask for help, It can ask for all the help it wants but the F35s and Abrams and you name it will never see the light of the day in Ukr for obvious reasons.
 
You think I made joke?
Most of soldiers Putin sends to war come from poor, underprivileged families. Many come from the eastern part of Russia, from religious ethnic minorities. That is what was found out under the dead soldiers.

True. Few from Moscow.
 
Russia has nukes.
This shields it. cause that 60 mile traffic jam near kiev would have been obliterated just like the highway of death in Iraq.

Nato has more military equipment, soldiers, population, tech, spending by a margin.
Its troops are also performing a lot better in wars, even far away from its border.

People here aren't just aware of the level of destruction NATO can bring to the Russian army. NATO would have already pulverised the Russian army and their supply routes. NATO would have enjoyed air superiority within the first hours/days of the operation. Russian army still hasn't achieved it after 4 fucking months. That 40 miles convoy would indeed have been pulverised.


So called world's second most powerful army. Just a bunch of looters and drunkards.
 
People here aren't just aware of the level of destruction NATO can bring to the Russian army. NATO would have already pulverised the Russian army and their supply routes. NATO would have enjoyed air superiority within the first hours/days of the operation. Russian army still hasn't achieved it after 4 fucking months. That 40 miles convoy would indeed have been pulverised.


So called world's second most powerful army. Just a bunch of looters and drunkards.

If NATO attacks Russia then China declares war on NATO and it be WW3.
 
If NATO attacks Russia then China declares war on NATO and it be WW3.

LMAO China will do jack shit to save Russia. Instead they're going to take advantage of it and conquer Russian land and ressources.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom