Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Nuclear Clown · May 26, 2022

Vergennes said:
Russia today in the first trial of its kind has dismissed 115 national guard members from Kabardino Balkaria for refusing to fight in Ukraine.

115 that won't come back home in trashbags

FairAndUnbiased said:
Whose we?

jamahir · May 26, 2022

wahhab0202 said:
Unless the wars in past didn't have a global impacts like today. World economy and politics were not as intermingle as they are today.
You'd better be careful with your wish. We don't who is down the line will replace Putin, what they are capable of and whether they are less or more hawkish than Putin. Seeing the 1st two weeks of this war I had an impression that Putin is being softer than a usual Russian leader should be. I don't know, I could be wrong.

Viet said:
Putin wants to be like Stalin.

Wahhab, you are right about the soft line. Russia hasn't destroyed things like the power infrastructure of Ukraine and bombed Kiev. Compare Russia's soft line to NATO which knows nothing but country-scale destruction : from North Korea in the 1950s to Iraq to Libya and Syria now.

Hassan Al-Somal · May 27, 2022

https://twitter.com/x/status/1529585244029997056

Nuclear Clown · May 27, 2022

jamahir said:
Wahhab, you are right about the soft line. Russia hasn't destroyed things like the power infrastructure of Ukraine and bombed Kiev. Compare Russia's soft line to NATO which knows nothing but country-scale destruction : from North Korea in the 1950s to Iraq to Libya and Syria now.

LIAR!
NATO didn't invaded Iraq in 2003, just kicked Saddam out of Kuwait in 1991, and on the behalf of the UNSC, therefore Russia and China didn't vetoed... Saddam invaded Kuwait prior to this
NATO just intervened in Libya 19 March 2011 – 31 October 2011, again on the behalf of the UNSC, therefore Russia and China didn't vetoed...Gaddafi was slaughtering populations.
NATO didn't intervened in Syria. Most of destructions : Russia's bombers+artillery
NATO didn't intervened in Korea, 1950. North Korea invaded South Korea after some idiot Yankee official declared that S-Korea wasn't under US nuclear umbrella. There should certainly hadn't been such destructions hadn't China and Russia got Implied...
And in all these cases, they didn't needed NATO to destroy their countries on their own...
You said civilian infrastructures?
Retroville shopping mall Kyiv:

Kyiv :

Hostomel, Kyiv main airport

Lviv powerstation : cruise missiles : Lviv is very far from the front, close to Poland's border.

There were 1000 ppl sheltered in the Mariupol theater when Russian Waffen SS dropped a FAB-3000, a 3000kg bunker buster bomb on it. 90-95% of this city of 450,000 is just like the pictures "after" Russian "liberation" from freedom and democracy:

In fact, Russia can't gain air superiority, thanks to Ukrainian air-force teaming with air defences systems and ManPADS, thanks God, Russian aircraft are crap, but Soviets used to do good SAMs, mainly thanks to Ukrainian engineers... S-300 is devastating for Sukhois, so, Putler the Butcher can't carpet bomb at will, using heavy bombers...The will only operate under the radar horizon

Have the heroes who defended Mariupol against the RuSSian Waffen-SS had some ManPADS left during the Azovstal siege, vlADOLF PUTLER would have less bombers now...
We definitively should deliver cruise missiles to Ukraine : the Kremlin is into range, the Hermitage Palace in St.Petersburg too, as well as Putin's $1.35bn mansion

Hassan Al-Somal · May 27, 2022

NotSure said:
Nope. More turkish garbage:

Let me correct you, for everything that was donated to Ukraine, the guided anti-tank weapons, camouflaged artillery, and Byraktar drones were most damaging to the Russian forces. They are just not enough to tilt the war to the Ukrainian favor, but their impact of the war is very significant.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1529895546009399319

Hassan Al-Somal · May 27, 2022

https://twitter.com/x/status/1529823443977351170

https://twitter.com/x/status/1529878619971063811

NotSure · May 27, 2022

Hassan Al-Somal said:
Let me correct you, for everything that was donated to Ukraine, the guided anti-tank weapons, camouflaged artillery, and Byraktar drones were most damaging to the Russian forces. They are just not enough to tilt the war to the Ukrainian favor, but their impact of the war is very significant.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1529895546009399319

Nonsense. You are confusing few propaganda videos with the real impact.

How many TB-2 would be enough? 1000? One million? They were scoring their most hits at the beginning of the war, when russia had the wrong strategy to advance as fast as possible. So they neglected the defence, including air def. But now with the change in strategy the TB-2 can maybe score here and there some hits, but as soon as they enter the zone with serious air defence, they get shot down.

The math is simple: How many TB-2 were delivered to Ukraine? How many videos we have from the whole war? Each TB-2 can strike 4 targets per sortie, the war is nearly 100 days old. If the TB-2 were that effective, we would have today thousands of vids with succesfull strikes. But instead we have how many? 20? Maybe 50? Their real effectiveness in this war is on par with suicide drones, at best. Look only at the ridiculous snake island propaganda. They have done their strikes and after that they got downed. This is the best they can achieve against a competent air def. But in most cases they get shot down way before ...

Btw: :lol: