What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

RUSSIAN OFFENSIVE CAMPAIGN ASSESSMENT, MAY 22​

May 22, 2022 - Press ISW
ISW%20LOGO%20FINAL%20ACRONYM%20%20%20NAME_ISW%20LOGO%20FINAL%20ACRONYM%20NAME%20CMYK_427.png

Download the PDF

Karolina Hird, George Barros, and Mason Clark
May 22, 4:00 pm ET
Russian forces made only minimal gains in eastern Ukraine on May 22. New reporting confirmed that Russian troops previously recaptured Rubizhne in northern Kharkiv Oblast, on May 19. Russian forces are likely committing additional reinforcements to hold their positions on the west bank of the Siverskyi Donets River in northern Kharkiv—rather than withdrawing across the river to use it as a defensive position—to prevent any further Ukrainian advances to the north or the east that could threaten Russian lines of communication to the Izyum axis.[1] Ukrainian sources additionally confirmed previous Russian-claimed advances around Popasna, and Russian forces likely seek to open a new line of advance north from Popasna to complete the encirclement of Severodonetsk while simultaneously driving west toward Bakhmut, though Russian forces are unlikely to be able to fully resource both lines of advance simultaneously.
Key Takeaways
  • Ukrainian sources confirmed that Russian forces have secured local advances to the north and west of Popasna since at least May 20. Russian forces likely seek to push further west toward Bakhmut and north to support the encirclement of Severodonetsk but remain unlikely to achieve rapid advances.
  • Russian forces will likely attempt to hold positions west of the Siverskyi Donets River against Ukrainian attacks (rather than retreating across the river) to prevent further Ukrainian advances from threatening Russian lines of communication to Izyum.
  • Russian occupying forces continued filtration and deportation procedures in and around Mariupol.
  • Russian forces are likely preparing to resume offensives on the southern axis.

We do not report in detail on Russian war crimes because those activities are well-covered in Western media and do not directly affect the military operations we are assessing and forecasting. We will continue to evaluate and report on the effects of these criminal activities on the Ukrainian military and population and specifically on combat in Ukrainian urban areas. We utterly condemn these Russian violations of the laws of armed conflict, Geneva Conventions, and humanity even though we do not describe them in these reports.
ISW has updated its assessment of the four primary efforts Russian forces are engaged in at this time. We have stopped coverage of supporting effort 4, “Sumy and northeastern Ukraine,” because it is no longer an active effort:

  • Main effort—Eastern Ukraine (comprised of one subordinate and three supporting efforts);
  • Subordinate main effort—Encirclement of Ukrainian troops in the cauldron between Izyum and Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts
  • Supporting effort 1—Mariupol;
  • Supporting effort 2—Kharkiv City;
  • Supporting effort 3—Southern axis.
Main Effort—Eastern Ukraine
Subordinate Main Effort—Southern Kharkiv, Donetsk, Luhansk Oblasts (Russian objective: Encircle Ukrainian forces in Eastern Ukraine and capture the entirety of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, the claimed territory of Russia’s proxies in Donbas)

Russian forces continued to prepare to resume offensive operations southeast of Izyum but did not make any confirmed advances on May 22.[2] The Ukrainian General Staff noted that Russian forces around Izyum are creating conditions to resume offensive actions toward Slovyansk.[3] Russian troops shelled frontline settlements to the southeast and southwest of Izyum, indicating continued Russian plans to move southward from Izyum toward the Donetsk Oblast administrative border.[4]

Russian forces continued ground assaults around Severodonetsk but did not make any confirmed advances in this area on May 22.[5] The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Russian troops conducted unsuccessful offensive operations around Oskolonivka, Purdivka, Schedryshcheve, and Smolyianinove, all settlements to the east of Severodonetsk.[6] These offensive operations are likely meant to encircle Severodonetsk from the east, supporting previous advances towards the city from the north (via Rubizhne), west (via Bilohorivka), and south (via Popasna). Ukrainian sources additionally confirmed Russian claims that ISW was previously unable to verify that Russian troops have secured limited advances north and west of Popasna since at least May 20.[7] The Ukrainian General Staff confirmed that fighting is ongoing in the area of Toshkivka, Komyshuvakha, Trypillya, and Vasylivka—all settlements around Popasna where Russian sources claimed to have broken through Ukrainian defenses on May 21, though ISW cannot confirm if Russian forces have fully captured any of these locations.[8] Geolocated combat footage from Volodymirivka, just west of Popasna, further corroborates these claims.[9] Russian forces attacking out of Popasna in several directions likely seek to both complete the encirclement of Severodonetsk from the south and push westward in Donetsk Oblast toward Bakhmut via Trypillya, Lypove, and Vasylivka.[10]
Russian forces continued artillery attacks around Lyman on May 22 but did not make any confirmed ground advances in the area.[11] Militia forces of the Donetsk People’s Republic claimed that they took control of Novoselivka, a village in southern Donetsk Oblast.[12]

Supporting Effort #1—Mariupol (Russian objective: Capture Mariupol and reduce the Ukrainian defenders)
Russian forces continued clearing the territory of the Azovstal Steel Plant on May 22.[13] Occupation forces in Mariupol continued carrying out strict filtration and deportation procedures. The Territorial Defense Headquarters of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DNR) claimed that 313 people, including 55 children, were deported from Mariupol to a filtration camp in Bezymmene.[14] Advisor to the Mayor of Mariupol Petro Andryushenko claimed that 70 people, including 12 children, were forcibly deported to Russia from Mariupol via the Nikolske filtration camp, although ISW cannot independently verify this claim.[15] Andryushchenko additionally stated that the occupation administration has tightened movement controls through the city of Mariupol, which is consistent with ISW’s earlier assessments that the information environment in Mariupol will become increasingly restricted in the coming weeks.[16]
Supporting Effort #2—Kharkiv City (Russian objective: Withdraw forces to the north and defend ground lines of communication (GLOCs) to Izyum)
Russian forces focused on maintaining their positions north of Kharkiv City and shelled Ukrainian positions on May 22.[17] The Ukrainian General Staff reported that elements of the Russian 6th Combined Arms Army and Baltic Fleet are fighting to prevent Ukrainian troops from reaching the international border.[18] The Internal Ministry of the Luhansk People’s Republic (LNR) additionally stated that its personnel are operating in the towns of Kozacha Lopan and Rubizhne (the Rubizhne in Kharkiv Oblast, not Luhansk Oblast), confirming ISW’s previous assessment that Russian forces retook some territory on May 19 that was previously captured by Ukrainian forces.[19] Russian forces continued to inflict artillery damage on settlements around Kharkiv City.[20]

Supporting Effort #3—Southern Axis (Objective: Defend Kherson against Ukrainian counterattacks)
Russian forces likely continued preparations for renewed offensives on the southern axis on May 22. The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Russian troops on this axis are focusing on building secondary lines of defense, strengthening air defense systems, conducting reconnaissance, and shelling Ukrainian positions, all of which indicates they are setting conditions for subsequent offensive actions.[21] Russian forces continued rocket and artillery strikes on Zaporizhia, Kherson, Dnipropetrovsk, and Mykolaiv Oblasts.[22] The Ukrainian Resistance Center additionally reported instances of Ukrainian partisan activity targeting collaboration officials and Russian artillery systems in Enerhodar and Melitopol, indicating continued and organized Ukrainian resistance in occupied areas of Ukraine.[23]

Immediate items to watch
  • Russian forces are likely reinforcing their grouping north of Kharkiv City to prevent further advances of the Ukrainian counteroffensive toward the Russian border. Russian forces may commit elements of the 1st Tank Army to northern Kharkiv in the near future.
  • The Russians will continue efforts to encircle Severodonetsk and Lysychansk at least from the south, possibly by focusing on cutting off the last highway connecting Severodonetsk-Lysychansk with the rest of Ukraine.
  • Russian forces in Mariupol will likely shift their focus to occupational control of the city as the siege of Azovstal has concluded.
  • Russian forces are likely preparing for Ukrainian counteroffensives and settling in for protracted operations in southern Ukraine.
 
.
and how many Russia is training.. 1 000 000!?

Not saying this for love of Russia or hatred of Ukraine,, but rationally Ukraine can not win this was.. it can resist but it can't win.. as simple as that.. it made a big mistake attaking its own Russian speaking citizens (most likely by those who wanted a war in that region).. and now it will pay for it.. simple.. just try to swallow and digest that NATO does not wish a war with Russian.. can Ukraine wage it really!???


Yes Ukraine can win the war. Russia is already near culmination in the East. The Izyum axis is practically done. Russia only has one offensive left at Severodonetsk. That’s it. Ukraine expected attritional warfare until the end of summer, and a large counteroffensive to follow.

Ukraine is now funded until the end of the year. Russia will continue to suffer significant losses. They can’t sustain this. It’s just a matter of time until Ukraine moves on the offensive. Their basically in waiting mode outside Kherson.
 
. .
and how many Russia is training.. 1 000 000!?

Not saying this for love of Russia or hatred of Ukraine.. but rationally Ukraine can not win this was.. it can resist but it can't win.. as simple as that.. it made a big mistake attaking its own Russian speaking citizens (most likely pushed by those who wanted a war in that region proposing some vague promises).. and now it will pay for it.. simple.. just try to swallow and digest that NATO does not wish a war with Russian.. can Ukraine wage it really!???


That is natural Uranium.. it possible.. but the the articles are talking about Russian Enriched Uranium..

The guy is apparently confused !

Without western soldiers on the ground to assist them, Ukraine is likely to become a landlocked country by the end of this year, or even earlier.
 
.
Without western soldiers on the ground to assist them, Ukraine is likely to become a landlocked country by the end of this year, or even earlier.


Russia is going to find it very difficult to control the coast if Ukraine receives deliveries of Harpoons and NSMs.

Russia also has zero chance of controlling Odesa.
 
. .
Yes, I am talking about the war as a whole.


Twist it, or turn it, they have 7 field armies on their soil, whom they now attrite at a rate of 0.5-1 battalion per week. Russians replenish at around at around the same rate for cannon fodder, and still have massive artillery advantage.

Russians cannot replenish things like pilots for tanks, and aviation, but for everything else, it's fine for them.

Even if they will be reduced to infantry, armoured cars, towed, and mortars, they can last for a really long time if they decide to dig in now. And "dig in now" is exactly what they are doing now.

The need for disruptive sideway pushes, and attack on enemy rear to prevent that is very obvious.
Well, it would be another deal if we are talking about a counter offensive. There are no way Ukraine can send in counter offensive in a wave that can take back the entire country as a whole. All counter offensive they can take right now is tactical, and local. The lost they had is just too big to recover. I would say this is not going to be doable if you have all the Western Armor and a fully functioning Air Force. The only advantage the Russian had in this war is they have taken small step, which mean it is easy to defend their gain.

The way I see it, there are two ways.

1.) Fight a conventional war with the Russian, that would cost them and us too much and this will drag on multi-years and we will see a WW1 style trench warfare like we had seen after 2014 in Donbas, just the front line is closer and longer. Very manpower and resource intensive, depends on Western Support, if the West is still supporting 6 months from now, this is doable.

2.) Stabilise the East then raise an insurgency in the occupied territories. An Afghan style solution for Russia. Eastern City are very sparse and very remote, with a few big city in between, that is a ideal place for insurgency warfare. I am Pretty sure the Ukraine has drilled on it, now, whether they will have local support is another issue, you cannot raise an insurgency without the occupied population support. But then this will drag on even longer, depends on how much Russia is willing to play (They having 2 million soldier does not mean they can mobilised them all) which means that is sheer comparison between Ukraine and Russia will, who want it more.

There is a 3rd way tho, much like how WW1 ended. You keep the war go on and wait for either side to start opposing it. And breaking with Central Power. Be it Russia or Ukrainian power. This war have all the earmark of WW1, WW1 also promise a quick war, an unsuccessful land invasion which drag on to produce a trench warfare result in stalemate. But whether who broke first or even if they will break is unknown.
 
. .
Well, it would be another deal if we are talking about a counter offensive. There are no way Ukraine can send in counter offensive in a wave that can take back the entire country as a whole. All counter offensive they can take right now is tactical, and local. The lost they had is just too big to recover. I would say this is not going to be doable if you have all the Western Armor and a fully functioning Air Force. The only advantage the Russian had in this war is they have taken small step, which mean it is easy to defend their gain.

The way I see it, there are two ways.

1.) Fight a conventional war with the Russian, that would cost them and us too much and this will drag on multi-years and we will see a WW1 style trench warfare like we had seen after 2014 in Donbas, just the front line is closer and longer. Very manpower and resource intensive, depends on Western Support, if the West is still supporting 6 months from now, this is doable.

2.) Stabilise the East then raise an insurgency in the occupied territories. An Afghan style solution for Russia. Eastern City are very sparse and very remote, with a few big city in between, that is a ideal place for insurgency warfare. I am Pretty sure the Ukraine has drilled on it, now, whether they will have local support is another issue, you cannot raise an insurgency without the occupied population support. But then this will drag on even longer, depends on how much Russia is willing to play (They having 2 million soldier does not mean they can mobilised them all) which means that is sheer comparison between Ukraine and Russia will, who want it more.

There is a 3rd way tho, much like how WW1 ended. You keep the war go on and wait for either side to start opposing it. And breaking with Central Power. Be it Russia or Ukrainian power. This war have all the earmark of WW1, WW1 also promise a quick war, an unsuccessful land invasion which drag on to produce a trench warfare result in stalemate. But whether who broke first or even if they will break is unknown.


Biden has already stated the US can sustain Ukraine for “years.” Russia is going to find itself in a hole it will take many, many years to recover from.

By the end of summer, Russia will likely have in excess of 100K+ casualties.
 
.
.
Biden has already stated the US can sustain Ukraine for “years.” Russia is going to find itself in a hole it will take many, many years to recover from.

By the end of summer, Russia will likely have in excess of 100K+ casualties.
A very recent announcement from Russia intrigue me. They started taking volunteer to fight for Russia from 18-40.

Which tell me two things.

1.) Putin don't want to ask for a general mobilisation for whatever reason, he don't need to call on volunteer, he have 2 millions reserve troop, he can just mobilise them

2.) Russia is probably very close to breaking in manpower. People may have said Ukraine have the same announcement at the beginning of war, and it is 18-60. But Ukraine is different. They ARE desperate for manpower because they are facing Russia, a stronger and bigger enemy. Russia on the other hand, is the attacker, it is really desperate if they wanted to ask for volunteer to fight in another country....

It suggested to me, Russia is running out of man to keep the war going. Or they dont spare the men they had for whatever reason, I mean, asking for volunteer on an attacking war means you are going to be a cannon fodder.
 
. .
I don't know in which world you live. People are fed up with the old wood (Biden). Every time you go to fill gas people as saying **** biden. The idiot can send 40$ billion to Ukraine but cannot provide relief to common people by cutting taxes on gas. Democrats are digging their grave. .

Mark my words, Russia and Putin will win in Ukraine although the cost would be high but they will gain a huge amount of land and resources while democrats will be buried in midterm and 2024.


Russia has already lost strategically, and it’s offensive capability in Ukraine is almost at an end. Ukraine is going to roll back Russian gains. It already has in Kyiv and Kharkiv.
 
. .

LEVI 🌍

The main events of May 22

Briefing by Russian Defence Ministry

💥During the day, high-precision air-based missiles have hit 3 command posts, 13 areas of Ukrainian manpower and military equipment concentration, as well as 4 ammunition depots

✈️💥Operational-tactical and army aviation have hit 3 command posts, 26 areas of AFU manpower and military equipment concentration, as well as 1 ammunition depot

▫️The attacks have resulted in the elimination of more than 210 nationalists and up to 38 armoured and motor vehicles.

💥Missile troops and artillery have hit 583 areas of enemy's manpower and military equipment concentration, 41 command posts, 76 artillery and mortar units at firing positions

Mariupol

▫️
Public transportation started working again in Mariupol

▫️Four
out of five hospitals have started working, three fuel stations have opened - fuel is sold without restrictions

Kids in charge of world politics

▫️
The process of Ukraine's possible accession to the European Union could take 15 or 20 years, a French official said.

▫️
Norway makes huge profits from oil and gas exports and should share their income, said Prime Minister of Poland Mateusz Morawiecki

▫️Borrell says EU military stocks are depleted due to aid to Ukraine

Turkey vs NATO

▫️ The Finnish Foreign Minister said he was "optimistic" about settling disagreements with Turkey on the issue of NATO membership, a decision, according to him, could take "several weeks."

„Finland can give Turkey assurances that links with the PKK will be monitored more closely.“

Russia’s foreign policy

▫️
Russia will soon put on combat duty about 50 new intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) "Sarmat"

Zelensky from the mental health clinic

▫️
Agreement was reached with the leadership of Poland to simplify border crossing between countries

▫️Ukraine withdrew from the Agreement on perpetuating the memory of the courage and heroism of the people of the Commonwealth of Independent States in the Great Patriotic War

International news


▫️A colonel in Iran's IRGC, Hassan Sayad Khodayari has been assassinated in Tehran

▫️Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman told the Financial Times that Saudi Arabia hopes to reach an agreement with Opec + that includes Russia
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom