Vergennes
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2014
- Messages
- 8,576
- Reaction score
- 61
- Country
- Location
Anyone here who thinks Rosgvardia are elite Russian troops is downright ignorant. They aren't even conventional troops, which proves they aren't sending their best troops in Phase 1. Yes they've used some VDV (the only credible point you have but VDV role has been minor), Rosgvardia, and Chechen troops and guess what? They now control 50%+ of Ukraine. Ukrainian military is getting destroyed no matter what Twitter tells you, they've had some successes but they have virtually lost half their country.
Nobody is arguing Russia's invasion is flawless but they have captured 50%+ of Ukraine, that with a force of mostly conscripts and Chechens. The reality is Russia is not using their best military force in Phase 1 of the invasion. Recently on CNN one military analyst said 25-30% of Russia's invading force are conscripts, another 1/3 are Kadryov's Chechen troops, the rest being a mix of regular military units and paramilitary.
1st Guard tank army is not being used in Ukraine (they've only been "activated") although they are one of Russia's best. But you just proved my point, the invading force was basically cannon fodder. It does seem however Russia wants to send more trained military units to occupy and expand into Ukraine for Phase 2. Russia cannot afford to lose its best units (especially over Ukraine) in the event they have a conflict with NATO, if they lose the ability to fight conventionally the only real option they have is nuclear.
How is this "+50% of Ukraine" ?
That's crap to claim Russians only sent second tier forces to attack Ukraine and sent them as cannon fodder,that is just a justification to Russia's poor performance in Ukraine,despite the fact elite tank divisions,VDV and motor rifles brigades were sent to Ukraine but performed so poorly.
You are claiming as if Russia had the same mass as the red army where they could afford to throw in forces without having to care about casualties. We are in 2022,not in 1980.
Russia can't afford to lose pilots,soldiers,tankists,officers,engineers,logisticians etc...
YET again I am asking you this simple question..... care to explain why is there no combined arms operations,severe lack of communication between different units and services (use of non secure communications),poor battle management,poor logistics.... So much that they have to send generals on frontlines),any explanation ?
Last edited: