Respectfully, I disagree.
The more one has to lose, the less they would want to lose. The Afghan Taliban prevailed because they had so little to lose after 9/11. Yes, one might say that 'life' is the ultimate loss for a human being but when you are cornered and your religion gives you a 'way out' via 'martyrdom'--a concept still runs very strong in Muslims worldwide--then the fighters like the Taliban would give any sacrifice to fight--and they fought hard. Forget the spoiled-from-the-modernity Ukrainians of now--even in the 1940s the French--a Superpower of its time--had large, if not the majority of its population capitulate before the Nazis and actively, if not purposefully collaborated with the occupiers. That aspect of France and many, if not most other European countries who were under the Nazi rule, is deliberately downplayed in the history which is, as all history is, written by the victors.
Unless we start to see historical events in more neutral ways instead of from the victors' version, unless we get to the root causes of wars, unless we realize that given similar circumstances, all humans would act similarly, we will continue to see wars. BTW, this war will be remembered in history as it broke the 80+ year old status quo in Europe--and perhaps in the world at large.