The SC
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2012
- Messages
- 32,233
- Reaction score
- 21
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well the Russians have established three field hospitals that we know about so far:I just thought of another benefit of the Bell V-280 tiltrotor - MediVac. Having Russian troops sent to Belarus hospitals is not ideal. I'm sure they'd rather treat them in Russia. 400 miles from Kharkiv, Ukraine to Moscow is easy for a V-280.
View attachment 823609
Yes, I do believe supporting Ukraine in their fight and supplying them with weapons to defend themselves is the right thing to do but I don't think your analogy describes the actual situation even remotely. Ukraine is a sovereign nation and is therefore allowed to freely choose who to align with. If they perceived Russia to be a threat and saw joining the NATO as a way to protect themselves, so be it.
Because Russia started a war with Ukraine by invading their country and clearly has ill intent.
By not arming Ukraine you let Russia capture Ukrainian cities easier and reach their objectives quicker. I fail to see how this would be more desirable to the Ukrainians than supporting them in their struggle to defend their own country against an invading Russian army.
Really ... Funny how Cuba was not a sovereign nation and how the whole missile crisis happened in cold war. I guess the sovereign part only works if it is in western interest.Yes, I do believe supporting Ukraine in their fight and supplying them with weapons to defend themselves is the right thing to do but I don't think your analogy describes the actual situation even remotely. Ukraine is a sovereign nation and is therefore allowed to freely choose who to align with. If they perceived Russia to be a threat and saw joining the NATO as a way to protect themselves, so be it.
No the war started because instead of striving for neutrality and seeking guarantees on that neutrality from both West and Russia the puppet regime installed by the West in Kiev decided to cross red lines. What did you think would have happened if during Cuban missile crisis the Cubans and Russians had not budged from their position.Because Russia started a war with Ukraine by invading their country and clearly has ill intent.
So you agree that you are only making it difficult for the Russians but in no way preventing it. What do you think the result would be on the Ukrainians for creating that difficulty. More lives lost more women and children killed, more teenagers dead. You really want to rationalize that giving them weaponry is a good thing for them ... or is it for you ... keep Russians occupied for as long as possible and while simultaneously fund privatized western military industrial complex. I guess few people will be getting really really rich from this war but I assure you it wont be the Ukrainian public.By not arming Ukraine you let Russia capture Ukrainian cities easier and reach their objectives quicker. I fail to see how this would be more desirable to the Ukrainians than supporting them in their struggle to defend their own country against an invading Russian army.
Phosporus and depleted uranium ok for the Americans,but when the Russians use thermobaric or phosphorus it's haram!Any good Azov; is a dead Azov.
Goodbye Nazis.
If the USA and Israel can use depleted Uranium bombs and Phosphorus Bombs in Palestine and the rest of the middle East.... What's the issue with the same in Ukraine. Let hell rain!.... No double standards.
Oh f...it's Communists shouting anti-NATO comments again: