KingMamba
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 23, 2012
- Messages
- 12,546
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
Russians really a shell of their former selves.So where are the usual PDF Pro Russia, Putin Roadie's now?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Russians really a shell of their former selves.So where are the usual PDF Pro Russia, Putin Roadie's now?
I find this the most remarkable.The situation is even worse in the air, with Ukrainian held territory able to deny access to Russian aircraft and drones but Russian air-defences being inadequate and degraded day by day.
Ukraine OR NATO?But would Ukrainesettle for Russia annexing parts of it? Even if just annexing smaller sections than the four new territories that Russia unilaterally declared as annexed?
I am Chinese of course i cheer for China. Ask Biden if we have any pull... LolAs if China has any pull in this conflict, boy you’re a Chinese cheerleader
None of the guys are singing the anthem. And the blond curly haired guy looks very annoyed.
The question is whether or not the enemy can sustain the losses as yourself? Sure, the US inflicted more casualties on Vietnam army and population and vice versa. However 60,000 own deaths, 300,000 own wounded on the US army are too much for the US.I'm not sure you can deplete any countries ability to raise troops. I've never seen it in any conflict. US killed a million Vietnamese, nazis killed 6 million jews. You cant really deplete anyones ability to raise an army.
@The SC
Is there a current updated map ?Ukrainians are already shifting from Kherson to Zaporijia
Russian troops DESTROY Ukraine dam then flee Kherson dressed as CIVILIANS
Russian troops DESTROY Ukraine dam then flee dressed as CIVILIANS
Incredible footage showed the moment the Nova Kakhovka dam on the Dnipro River was blown up by retreating Russian soldiers.www.dailymail.co.uk
Of course, because russia is much more than 30 years behind US in military tech and capability. Probably 50 years.NATO/USAF/RAF did this so perfectly in Gulf War 1 - when going after scud launchers in the 1990's - but 30 years laters - Russia still cannot do the same thing !!!!! Shocking ..
Create a more target rich environment?What do you think will happen when the Russians are fully mobilized?
hehehe in the long term we wont be around.In the short term things are going ok.
In the long term we dont know.
No it's not actually.So why ignore that entirely and simply claim as if you are absolutely right that Ukraine will have to join NATO for future security. Isn't that ignoring the whole supposed reason for actual direct kinetic war?
I think it's irrelevant.It's not up to Russia to discuss but Russia's response to Ukraine joining NATO post any settlement would be on the mind of NATO and Ukraine.
No one cares how they would respond.Are you not ignoring how NATO and Ukraine would be worried about how Russia would respond?
They cant do anything in Serbia either. Firstly, Serbs will not let them, not even the serbs are crazy enough to let Russians into their country. Historically the only time Russian troops were in Serbia was 1945 and only for a couple of months and only in the northern part of the country. Had they stayed longer there would have been a war between then Yugoslavia and USSR. Russian troops are definitely not welcome in Serbia, the country that support russia the most.Balkan was surrounded by NATO, I don't see anything Russia can do except maybe in Serbia.
There are no decreasing energy resources, Europe just wants to close all its coal and nuke plants and is then surprised electricity is so expensive.What is the sense of sustain Europe high standard life for USA? Nothing. It's a problem in a decreasing world in energy resources and raw materials.
he is called "Han Patriot" so yeah, he is.As if China has any pull in this conflict, boy you’re a Chinese cheerleader