Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Spoiler: Graphic

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586037112020893697

 

[Shawnee]

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586046611943485441

 

[The SC]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585753662458298368

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585924061070168064

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585861778491133952

The B61-12, represents one of the most important nuclear munitions that NATO relies on strongly for "tactical" nuclear strikes (of course in addition to the tactical nuclear cruise air and sea),

This version is the latest and most recent of its class (B61-family), the infographic below gives a good general idea about the B61-12 bomb, the programming of the detonation force (multi-forces and diversity in effect according to the nature of the target) and its programming method, guidance methods, approved air platforms, number of bombs The approximate (until the year 2020), its spread / distribution in NATO countries in Europe (I think the number has been increased recently due to the increase in tension)... Finally, the programming method and the device for programming the bomb..

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586046611943485441

Russia builds 100 Msta-SM2 artillery a year.

 

[jhungary]

honestly , there is no point in that discussion , that drone hit top of the building , if you put photo of such drone and said it was intercepted there wa no argument from me
this is interception (let not go into the fact its in front of green screen and the drone moved from another place there )

the video was actually hitting target


two decades of being in usa camps .do that , the ones who escape were not the ones fighting USA and Nato

Whatever you say, I said my piece, and your story is the one that keep changing.

I mean, if you believe in your story, that's you. I said, as an intelligence expert. That particular strike was likely to be intercepted. Because the explosion is above ground and there are no second det when the explosion occur, it's that simple.

And yes, it's pointless to keep arguing. Because you will try to find some way to justify your point, even if that argument goes completely opposite to what your previous argument claim. And I am not about to argue 90 different way on the same incident whether or not they are at the same side of the story, I don't just toss speculation out there and hope it hit something.

 

[The SC]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585985080153063424

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585984826451976192

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585981070977089536

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586013622232576000

 

[Shawnee]

Whatever you say, I said my piece, and your story is the one that keep changing.

I mean, if you believe in your story, that's you. I said, as an intelligence expert. That particular strike was likely to be intercepted. Because the explosion is above ground and there are no second det when the explosion occur, it's that simple.

And yes, it's pointless to keep arguing. Because you will try to find some way to justify your point, even if that argument goes completely opposite to what your previous argument claim. And I am not about to argue 90 different way on the same incident whether or not they are at the same side of the story, I don't just toss speculation out there and hope it hit something.

Look at the big picture. Defense mechanism will not save anyone.

I think it is clear what the correct answer is:
- Choice A: Shahed performance is excellent.
- Choice B: AD performance is excellent

 

[Paul2]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585696020599836672

So A1 Excalibur came, old ones were regular M982.

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586055860371214336

 

[Paul2]

Something is definitely brewing in the Tokmak direction.

I can't believe Russians don't see the amount of their troops there being dangerously low.

AUF will need a major troop count to make a deep enough dent in Russian controlled area just because of size of the area, but still.

 

[jhungary]

Look at the big picture. Defense mechanism will not save anyone.

I think it is clear what the correct answer is:
- Choice A: Shahed performance is excellent.
- Choice B: AD performance is excellent

look at it this way.

If Shahed drone only used to hit civilian infrastructure, then you don't even need to intercept it. Because it does nothing to the military situation in Ukraine. You want a weapon to win a war, not a weapon to hit civilian infrastructure. Since the introduction of this drone, nothing has change for the Russian on the battlefront. sure, you can damage some building, but then what that do to frontline troop. Infact, Ukraine just cut off the main supply line to Kreminna just today, after taking around 15 settlement northeast of Kherson. if Shahed Drone are any "Wonder" weapon, it would have, and should have, turning the ties for the Russian right now, what it has been? It's almost 2 months.

 

[The SC]

The Russians are pushing everywhere..

Ukraine War Map | Massive Battle Near Kremmina | Zelensky says Russian Kherson Retreat is a TRAP​

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

look at it this way.

If Shahed drone only used to hit civilian infrastructure, then you don't even need to intercept it. Because it does nothing to the military situation in Ukraine. You want a weapon to win a war, not a weapon to hit civilian infrastructure. Since the introduction of this drone, nothing has change for the Russian on the battlefront. sure, you can damage some building, but then what that do to frontline troop. Infact, Ukraine just cut off the main supply line to Kreminna just today, after taking around 15 settlement northeast of Kherson. if Shahed Drone are any "Wonder" weapon, it would have, and should have, turning the ties for the Russian right now, what it has been? It's almost 2 months.

Cutting off electricity is devastating. You cannot refine oil without electricity. No fuel means tanks cannot move.

 

[Shawnee]

look at it this way.

If Shahed drone only used to hit civilian infrastructure, then you don't even need to intercept it. Because it does nothing to the military situation in Ukraine. You want a weapon to win a war, not a weapon to hit civilian infrastructure. Since the introduction of this drone, nothing has change for the Russian on the battlefront. sure, you can damage some building, but then what that do to frontline troop. Infact, Ukraine just cut off the main supply line to Kreminna just today, after taking around 15 settlement northeast of Kherson. if Shahed Drone are any "Wonder" weapon, it would have, and should have, turning the ties for the Russian right now, what it has been? It's almost 2 months.

Shutting down the whole power grid of a country and zeroing morale is nothing to you?
US did that to Iraq too.

The propaganda page is significantly toward Russians due to these drones as well.

Give it more time to see its ground effect if Russia keeps buying and destroying infrastructures.

Thanks to Shahed, Russia does not need to use tactical nukes now.