Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 28,401
- Reaction score
- -82
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whatever you say, I said my piece, and your story is the one that keep changing.honestly , there is no point in that discussion , that drone hit top of the building , if you put photo of such drone and said it was intercepted there wa no argument from me
this is interception (let not go into the fact its in front of green screen and the drone moved from another place there )
the video was actually hitting target
two decades of being in usa camps .do that , the ones who escape were not the ones fighting USA and Nato
Whatever you say, I said my piece, and your story is the one that keep changing.
I mean, if you believe in your story, that's you. I said, as an intelligence expert. That particular strike was likely to be intercepted. Because the explosion is above ground and there are no second det when the explosion occur, it's that simple.
And yes, it's pointless to keep arguing. Because you will try to find some way to justify your point, even if that argument goes completely opposite to what your previous argument claim. And I am not about to argue 90 different way on the same incident whether or not they are at the same side of the story, I don't just toss speculation out there and hope it hit something.
look at it this way.Look at the big picture. Defense mechanism will not save anyone.
I think it is clear what the correct answer is:
- Choice A: Shahed performance is excellent.
- Choice B: AD performance is excellent
look at it this way.
If Shahed drone only used to hit civilian infrastructure, then you don't even need to intercept it. Because it does nothing to the military situation in Ukraine. You want a weapon to win a war, not a weapon to hit civilian infrastructure. Since the introduction of this drone, nothing has change for the Russian on the battlefront. sure, you can damage some building, but then what that do to frontline troop. Infact, Ukraine just cut off the main supply line to Kreminna just today, after taking around 15 settlement northeast of Kherson. if Shahed Drone are any "Wonder" weapon, it would have, and should have, turning the ties for the Russian right now, what it has been? It's almost 2 months.
look at it this way.
If Shahed drone only used to hit civilian infrastructure, then you don't even need to intercept it. Because it does nothing to the military situation in Ukraine. You want a weapon to win a war, not a weapon to hit civilian infrastructure. Since the introduction of this drone, nothing has change for the Russian on the battlefront. sure, you can damage some building, but then what that do to frontline troop. Infact, Ukraine just cut off the main supply line to Kreminna just today, after taking around 15 settlement northeast of Kherson. if Shahed Drone are any "Wonder" weapon, it would have, and should have, turning the ties for the Russian right now, what it has been? It's almost 2 months.