F-22Raptor
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2014
- Messages
- 16,980
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
they can put their pride aside and buy our Fajr-5c , it has 130km of range and with GNSS it is precise
That map is misleading.....
they may say those infrastructures provide power to Ukraine military infrastructureSuch attacks by Russia on civil infrastructures are act of terror, coward, against international laws, against war conducts. That won’t change anything on the battlefields.
Also, when light goes off in Donbas then the separatists will sit in the darkness.
It's not whether or not Russia have the reach to get the HIMARS. It's whether or not they can find it.they can put their pride aside and buy our Fajr-5c , it has 130km of range and with GNSS it is precise
lol, if they need grid power to provide for Military Infrastructure, then it's even more amazing how Russia can lose that much territories to an Army that backward.they may say those infrastructures provide power to Ukraine military infrastructure
another problem with russia is they use drone to spot enemy and then they had to find some artillery that is in range to attack it . they still don't get the concept that the drone must be able to do the strike when have the chance not wasting the times on finding someone else who can do the strikeIt's not whether or not Russia have the reach to get the HIMARS. It's whether or not they can find it.
Russia have Air Asset and Missile asset to hit HIMARS in a standoff range, in fact, when HIMARS was first donated, many analysts expected that 7 or 12 would not last long because Russia will actively seek and destroy it, I even talked about that with another member here (I don't remember who I talked to) and saying this will be Russian White Ghost if Russia decided to chase it down.
Problem is, Russia did not exactly chase it down, conventional estimation judging from Russian COUNTBAT Mission, it takes anywhere between 90-120 seconds for Russia to launch a COUNTBAT strike. What they should have done is not calculate the incoming but have forward personnel send drone to locate those HIMARS. That has not been done, which mean most Russian COUNTBAT mission is a simple guessing game. I have saw footage of Russian COUNTBAT after a Ukrainian 2S3 strike, you can see from the round dispersion, you can literally see they fix a position without knowing whether or not the tube was still there and go nuts on that general area, that's a sign they are guessing their coord. Don't get me wrong, they did it quite close (The guy said they landed 5 km away) but that probably works with 2S3 or other older SPG, it won't work with HIMARS as HIMARS rocket change direction mid-course to counter just that.
that's Russia , several month ago i said they are stock in Korea war mentality, they literally have no concept of modern warfarelol, if they need grid power to provide for Military Infrastructure, then it's even more amazing how Russia can lose that much territories to an Army that backward.
It's easier to say than done.another problem with russia is they use drone to spot enemy and then they had to find some artillery that is in range to attack it . they still don't get the concept that the drone must be able to do the strike when have the chance not wasting the times on finding someone else who can do the strike