What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

Conventionally you will need at least 3 to 1, but most of the time you can make do with 2 to 1, but then it would have been a bloody fight.

The motivation wouldn't really matter for a professional army, so the question will be whether or not Russia is professional enough. It seems like it's what Ukraine is betting on tho, that's Russian army is not really that professional, because as I said, from what I can see on the position in battlefield, seems like the Ukrainian is trying to encircle them and then either hitting their supply line and starve their will to fight by hitting their GLOC or level the city with the Russian in it. Either way, I don't sense that the Ukrainian is looking for a fight to finish off the Russian, seems like they want to encircle it, make the Russian know there are no escape, and they would have to pull out instead of perishing inside the city.
Well considering the limited venues of retreat, allowing them an exit might be wise to get a retreat/rout going.

This route can then be saturated by Himars once they get piled up there?
 
Well considering the limited venues of retreat, allowing them an exit might be wise to get a retreat/rout going.

This route can then be saturated by Himars once they get piled up there?
This is extremely similar to when Russia attack Sieverodonetsk and Lysychansk, the Russian surrounded the Ukrainian on 3 sides with the river behind Sieverodonetsk and all 3 bridges destroyed, Ukrainian choose to fight until their position is untenable, and then retreat back across the river.

This is more or less the same, Ukrainian is attacking the Russian on 3 fronts, with the Dnieper behind the Russian back over Kherson and with all the bridges either destroyed or damage and cannot be used. Now whether or not Russian troop would fight it out and perish inside the city, or they will hold on to it until the Ukrainian closing the ring and make their position untenable and withdraw across the river. That is unknown.
 
This is extremely similar to when Russia attack Sieverodonetsk and Lysychansk, the Russian surrounded the Ukrainian on 3 sides with the river behind Sieverodonetsk and all 3 bridges destroyed, Ukrainian choose to fight until their position is untenable, and then retreat back across the river.

This is more or less the same, Ukrainian is attacking the Russian on 3 fronts, with the Dnieper behind the Russian back over Kherson and with all the bridges either destroyed or damage and cannot be used. Now whether or not Russian troop would fight it out and perish inside the city, or they will hold on to it until the Ukrainian closing the ring and make their position untenable and withdraw across the river. That is unknown.

The situation is not comparable. While it is true there is also a river, but the other side of the river is controlled by Russians who can shot missiles across the river. Even if Ukrainians reach Kherson city they cannot take the city because of missile strikes from the other side of the river.
 
It's a blood bath going in kherson hundreds of Ukrainians have died while thousands trapped, but Ukraine sent more reinforcement with huge number of soldiers and armored vehicles with no artillery :/

This is the first ever forever war in human history where it is fought down to the last man, woman, or child. It is barbarism that has no place in past centuries and millenia and certainly not in today's civilized world.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom