The SC
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2012
- Messages
- 32,233
- Reaction score
- 21
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Basically - so Russian airstrikes on Ukranian airbases failed as they obviously missed their targets ... looks there is jamming of terminal guidance of russian missiles now at ukranian bases, causing russian missiles and drones to miss ...
It was hit during the gap..but a week later it got bigger, stronger and deeper.. they couldn't defend their troops stuck in the gap anymore..they were sitting ducks..
It is quite telling that Russia never provides any air or satellite reconnaissance images to prove its claims. Russias ability to do battle assessment must be close to non-existent inside Ukraine.
They hit 2 bridges..I was going to make the effort to explain the post since it was very clear he completely misunderstood the point, but then I didn't want to waste my time and effort lol.
Honestly, the photos might be a little deceiving and we can't really see the extent of the true damage, but it just seems like the Storm Shadow/SCALP EG CM doesn't really pack a punch for the size of the cruise missile. I would've thought the hole/crater would've been larger than that. But then again, like I said, that is very thick reinforced concrete and penetrating factors of the ordinance are not as strong as bunker-busting type munitions and photo might be a little deceiving.
Also, interesting to see a SCALP mounted on a Su-24.
EDIT: This view from this angle shows a considerable amount of damage. That hole is certainly deceiving.
View attachment 944094
They hit 2 bridges..
Ukrainians Use SU-24 From NATO Territory.
This is absolute Rubbish - once again - where is the proof for this ??
lmao those bridges have been hit by aircrafts Russia claimed to have destroyed.
Military Summary is a pro russian channel. He is into conspiracy and doesnt really need proof:This is absolute Rubbish - once again - where is the proof for this ??