Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 28,401
- Reaction score
- -82
- Country
- Location
In a parallel universe the US army has DJI drones in Vietnam war.
Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2
- Thread starter waz
- Start date
In a parallel universe the US army has DJI drones in Vietnam war.
Well that's a question we need to ask Putin, Medvedev & the Russian establishment.
We are in no position to dictate whether Russia feels threatened or not.
When they see NATO constantly expanding eastwards despite past assurances; when they see a orchestrated orange revolution in the country next door, and then the oppression of ethic Russians and the orthodox Church, then quite frankly they have every right to feel threatened. I'm just questioning whether it's wise to support the clown of Kiev to the detriment of the EU against a nuclear backdrop.
Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 28,401
- Reaction score
- -82
- Country
- Location
Same reason the US invaded Cuba when Cuba declared independence from Spain. The US is not a saint. The US is full of invasion in its history.
Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 28,401
- Reaction score
- -82
- Country
- Location
gambit
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 28,569
- Reaction score
- 148
- Country
- Location
In SEAD/DEAD, an air defense unit being fixed is both an advantage and disadvantage.
Being fixed means the attackers has to come to you. It means you have the ability to create unknown tactics like how Zoltan Dani managed to shoot down an F-117. The air attackers are also threatened by the ground itself, meaning they have limited vertical travel. They can escape your threats by gaining altitude, but at the same time, altitude negatively affects weapons accuracy and precision, forcing them to descend again. Last, they have fuel which mean time limits.
The disadvantage for you is that the attackers have more maneuvering flexibility than you. They have less reliance on their radars than you do on yours. They can put their radars on standby and line up their attacks on visual. You cannot. The attackers outnumbers you, meaning as they pairs up from the tried-and-true four-ship, you are attacked on at least two different directions, and you have nowhere to move. If you turn off your radar, your missiles are useless, meaning you are vulnerable at all time.
No one has put more on studying SEAD/DEAD tactics than US. Had US/NATO air forces entered Ukraine, this war would not last six months.
The End.
Being fixed means the attackers has to come to you. It means you have the ability to create unknown tactics like how Zoltan Dani managed to shoot down an F-117. The air attackers are also threatened by the ground itself, meaning they have limited vertical travel. They can escape your threats by gaining altitude, but at the same time, altitude negatively affects weapons accuracy and precision, forcing them to descend again. Last, they have fuel which mean time limits.
The disadvantage for you is that the attackers have more maneuvering flexibility than you. They have less reliance on their radars than you do on yours. They can put their radars on standby and line up their attacks on visual. You cannot. The attackers outnumbers you, meaning as they pairs up from the tried-and-true four-ship, you are attacked on at least two different directions, and you have nowhere to move. If you turn off your radar, your missiles are useless, meaning you are vulnerable at all time.
No one has put more on studying SEAD/DEAD tactics than US. Had US/NATO air forces entered Ukraine, this war would not last six months.
The End.
Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 28,401
- Reaction score
- -82
- Country
- Location
In a parallel universe the US is the only country in the world, having conquered and annexed every other country. Like Qin dynasty.
Medvedev Et al. are all Putins sock puppets in this giant masquerade of a country pretending not to be a criminal organization.
NATO is not “expanding“. Countries seek protection through a mutual defence pact. This is no threat to russian territory. The mutual defence pact is a threat to russian imperial ambitions, and quite frankly, who gives a shit?
Supporting Ukraine is very wise, and we should have done it 100% back in 2014.
Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 28,401
- Reaction score
- -82
- Country
- Location
Dalit
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2012
- Messages
- 23,669
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
At one point in my life, I put myself at risk serving my country. I was on Victor Alert duty, that is nuclear armed F-111s. What have YOU done? If nothing, then you have no cause to criticize anyone so do everyone a favor and STFU.
You are ridiculously funny. F-111 and F-16 pilot LMAO God, this guy is insanely hilarious. A nuclear armed F-111 LOL
gambit
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 28,569
- Reaction score
- 148
- Country
- Location
No...no...no...F-111 and F-16 hangars janitor.
Dalit
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2012
- Messages
- 23,669
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
No...no...no...F-111 and F-16 hangars janitor.
You should become a full time comedian. You can make people laugh from a keyboard. Just imagine seeing you live on the stage.
A nuclear armed F-111 LOL God...
Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 28,401
- Reaction score
- -82
- Country
- Location
gambit
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 28,569
- Reaction score
- 148
- Country
- Location
Ukraine air war examined: A glimpse at the future of air warfare
Six months into the war in Ukraine, defense planners can learn from Ukrainian success and Russian failures in the air domain.
www.atlanticcouncil.org
First, their initial strikes on February 24 were largely ineffective in landing an immediate knockout blow. The air and missile strikes were distributed across the country, preventing the concentration of effects, and those effects were not targeted against critical C2 nodes. Consequently, Ukrainian air and air-defense capabilities were not prohibited from conducting defensive operations.
Second, Russia’s non-kinetic effects had limited impact and were poorly integrated with the kinetic strikes. Cyberattacks and electronic warfare, including counter-space attacks, were observed in the initial offensive, but their effects were severely limited.
Third, Russia’s suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) plan was wholly inadequate. Russian air and missile strikes did not effectively target Ukraine’s integrated air-defense system (IADS). They failed to destroy mobile SAMs, and their targeting of Ukrainian military airfields was largely ineffective, as they did not crater runways nor destroy nearly enough combat aircraft on the ground to prevent effective Ukrainian defense.
Fourth, Russian forces failed to integrate tactical or battlefield intelligence; they did not appear to know where high-value targets were, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, mobile SAMs, critical IADS nodes, and Ukrainian military command posts. Finally, Russia appeared to have no plan for countering Ukrainian uncrewed aerial systems (UASs) and drones, and those systems took a devastating toll on Russian ground forces. The air campaign appeared to have no overarching concept or unifying theme: Russian forces were unable to decapitate Ukrainian leadership, or blind and/or paralyze Ukrainian IADS. As such, Ukrainian air defenses were operating at or near full capability, and they were able to institute huge aircraft losses from the first day of the conflict.
Basically, the Russian military did the worst thing possible: Rested on its laurels. Since airpower ranks so prominent in modern warfare, the VKS sucks.
Had US/NATO air forces entered Ukraine, maybe this war would last six months tops.
The End.
Are you saying the F-111 is NOT capable of carrying/delivering nuclear bombs?
Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 28,401
- Reaction score
- -82
- Country
- Location
If NATO air force gets involved then China gets involved. Nobody bullies China's neighbors. Don't forget Korean war.
Last edited:
xyx007
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2017
- Messages
- 3,340
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Explosive news..... We want @OfficialDGISPR to issue a statement as soon as possible, tell the nation what is the truth and prove that we are wrong. After the regime change, the first visit of the chief was made by China
itself by inviting the company. The company will be caught again, but China has exposed the black deeds of the generals of Pakistan and India by inviting them home. The media in Pakistan is completely silent. No, otherwise the doors of the house may break
What was happening behind the scenes and what was happening in Pakistan? China has expressed its deepest concerns and displeasure by inviting Hafiz on a five-day visit. Objection
What happened? Why was Hafiz's wind blown?
Pakistan, which has provided small ammunition and missiles to Ukraine at the behest of the United States, which Russia is very angry about (which the BBC has also reported after our news), has now found out that they also have those weapons. It includes what India gave to Armenia during the war, which is made by India, which was proved ineffective. Now the question is, how did those weapons reach Ukraine along with Pakistan's weapons? They are selling their arms to Ukraine and this has been proven because India is an ally of Russia, it cannot sell arms directly, then the question arises whether Pakistan has also taken money from India to sell arms to India, which was done by the agency of Russia. It has been proven that China also took money from the United States in the same way that Ukraine has played the role of a middleman. If so, how did Indian weapons come to Pakistan? So who gave the permission, was the government of Pakistan told to the parliament, why the money of the arms did not come to the bank of the government of Pakistan, then who played the role of agent for India? It has been told about this game, the question is why Russia did not do this protest through Pakistan, why did it through China? Because after Bajwa's statement condemning Russia in the Russia-Ukraine war, Russia thinks that there is no people's government in Pakistan, so company did not send Bilawal to Russia because the company knew what Russia had to say, only the army would control everything. When China shows evidence to Hafiz, Hafiz became speechless, nothing was being said
What has been happening in Pakistan, take Imran here, take him here, cancel the bails, arrest the children, keep the media busy, take the children from the social media, sometimes through the courts, sometimes through the institutions, to the public for a whole year. It is kept busy and the media and fourteen facilitators are keeping the public busy. Meanwhile, business is going on fast and the army will not allow elections to be held until the war in Ukraine.
What was happening behind the scenes and what was happening in Pakistan? China has expressed its deepest concerns and displeasure by inviting Hafiz on a five-day visit. Objection
What happened? Why was Hafiz's wind blown?Pakistan, which has provided small ammunition and missiles to Ukraine at the behest of the United States, which Russia is very angry about (which the BBC has also reported after our news), has now found out that they also have those weapons. It includes what India gave to Armenia during the war, which is made by India, which was proved ineffective. Now the question is, how did those weapons reach Ukraine along with Pakistan's weapons? They are selling their arms to Ukraine and this has been proven because India is an ally of Russia, it cannot sell arms directly, then the question arises whether Pakistan has also taken money from India to sell arms to India, which was done by the agency of Russia. It has been proven that China also took money from the United States in the same way that Ukraine has played the role of a middleman. If so, how did Indian weapons come to Pakistan? So who gave the permission, was the government of Pakistan told to the parliament, why the money of the arms did not come to the bank of the government of Pakistan, then who played the role of agent for India? It has been told about this game, the question is why Russia did not do this protest through Pakistan, why did it through China? Because after Bajwa's statement condemning Russia in the Russia-Ukraine war, Russia thinks that there is no people's government in Pakistan, so company did not send Bilawal to Russia because the company knew what Russia had to say, only the army would control everything. When China shows evidence to Hafiz, Hafiz became speechless, nothing was being said
What has been happening in Pakistan, take Imran here, take him here, cancel the bails, arrest the children, keep the media busy, take the children from the social media, sometimes through the courts, sometimes through the institutions, to the public for a whole year. It is kept busy and the media and fourteen facilitators are keeping the public busy. Meanwhile, business is going on fast and the army will not allow elections to be held until the war in Ukraine.
Similar threads
- Article
