What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

Are you going to spam this every day now?

I hope for you that there will be a counteroffensive...otherwise you will hear my question more often...not so often as you and other asked here many times if Russia already conquered Bakhmut...but often enough
 
FtYseagXsAAOGkW
 
Ukraine still awaits the arrival the mass of tanks and weapons. Especially the leopards 1, leopards 2. Some weapons arrived, some not. Ukraine needs tanks to overcome the Russians trenches and artillery. Makes no sense to start too early without sufficient amor. Be patient.

Well, in the "old world of war" (till ~ 2000) tanks were essential for greater ground operations. But as everyone can see in Ukraine it isnt fully true anymore. All the ATGMs, Drones, guided arty shells ect. lower the efficiency of "ground tanks". So to compensate one have to provide much more tanks or more higher armored tanks to get the same result as 20-30 years ago. But as you said Ukraine do not get enough tanks and the few more higher armored tanks are to few and to heavy to make any greater effect on the whole line of contact.
 

Artillery duels. Operational pause in Bakhmut. Military Summary And Analysis 2023.04.11

 

Why Europe Never Fully Recovered from the 2008 Financial Crisis​


The USA has a policy to keep down rivals, the European Union is a foe. The Republican cia has hated the EEC/EU since the Treaty of Rome. Adenauer dreamed of a European Union with a strong and successful Germany and Europe. USA wants Germany and Italy and Spain to be kept down. And once Europe was no longer useful to fight the Soviets after the fall of the Soviet Union, and the USA owning Russia politically and economically, the USA did their covert warfare against Europe.

Trump calls European Union a 'foe' – ahead of Russia and China​


The European Union faces controlled demolition after controlled demolition from the USA.

The best policy is energy independence, military strength (Europe wasted a year in not building hundreds of arms factories), and economic powerhouse.

The problem is there are few completely smart people in Europe. By design, if you don't like the USA, you are funneled to be a stupid Putinite, a pawn of the Russia Republican cia. If you want economic growth, you are funneled to support low military spending. If you want energy independence, you are opposed to other good ideas. If you want a strong militaries, you are fooled that the USA would save Europe. There are few in Europe that have it 100% right. And you need to be 100% right to defeat the schemes of cia Washington, Brexit London and Putin Moscow.

The USA pulls the strings on their puppets to defeat rivals. Infighting, fake populists.

Bush, Trump, Putin, Brexiters to defeat Europe.

Look at the chart, the "make China the factory of the globe", was at the expense of Europe, not the USA. German engineering, German export economy. China rose, Europe was left behind with crisis after crisis. USA used China to keep down rival. Trump was tasked with the shut down mission on China to loot China to the USA. This is why Europeans cannot side with the USA over China. Let China and USA sleep in the same bed they made.

First, have European and global jobs go to China. Secondly, have Trump shut down China. Finally, those global jobs go to the USA and USA new partners. Keep down USA rival China. Keep down USA rival Europe. So to prevent this, promoting anti-Republican agenda is vital. Though the USA has this covered, with Trumper Putin saying Putin is the leader and the face of anti-Americanism. So Putinism, leads to Americanism.

The objective is to gain military supremacy, economic supremacy and political supremacy over overt foes Russia, China and the USA. And trust the USA never again.
 
Last edited:
Well, in the "old world of war" (till ~ 2000) tanks were essential for greater ground operations. But as everyone can see in Ukraine it isnt fully true anymore. All the ATGMs, Drones, guided arty shells ect. lower the efficiency of "ground tanks". So to compensate one have to provide much more tanks or more higher armored tanks to get the same result as 20-30 years ago. But as you said Ukraine do not get enough tanks and the few more higher armored tanks are to few and to heavy to make any greater effect on the whole line of contact.
Tank is and will remain the king on battlefield. Nothing will replace the role of a tank. Anti tank weapons are static. You can’t launch any offensive, least to win a war with anti tank weapons.
 
Tank is and will remain the king on battlefield. Nothing will replace the role of a tank. Anti tank weapons are static. You can’t launch any offensive, least to win a war with anti tank weapons.
wonder which is better, modern attack helicopters or modern tanks
 
Tank is and will remain the king on battlefield. Nothing will replace the role of a tank. Anti tank weapons are static. You can’t launch any offensive, least to win a war with anti tank weapons.


very true

with all those anti tanks weapons Ukraine still could not stop the Russian advance

there simply isn't enough NLAWS, Javelin and Stingers as Russia has armoured vehicle and helicopters an fighters
 

Russia 'gains ground in 80%' Bakhmut, Wagner parades captured U.S. armoured vehicle​


Only a matter of time now before Russia captures Bakhmut and moves on to the next target.


The presence of Western special forces in Ukraine has been the subject of quiet speculation for more than a year. But it's never been confirmed, until now.

It says that the UK is among a number of countries with special forces operating in Ukraine. According to the document, dated 23 March, the UK has the largest contingent (50), followed by Latvia (17), France (15), the US (14) and the Netherlands (1).
 
Back
Top Bottom