Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

[Viet]

that will be a huge boost for Ukraine artillery.

350,000 artillery shells per month. That’s the minimum. Ukraine artillery needs more to keep on par with Russians artillery.

A lot of ammo to rain on Russia’s invasion army heads

However the EU can only finance parts of the ammo. The rest must be burdened by the US.

EU agrees 2-billion-euro ammunition plan for Ukraine

European Union ministers agreed Monday on a two-billion-euro plan to raid their own arsenals and jointly purchase desperately needed ammunition for Ukraine.

amp.france24.com

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

Looks like Russia is trying to get intact western UAVs to harvest their tech ?? Otherwise why not shoot it down with guns/AAM ?

A drone with bullet holes would be hard to explain.

They did not expect that the drone could look backwards with their camera,
and if it crashed as a result of them spraying it with fuel, they would just lie, lie and lie again - like they always do about the cause.

Now they are caught with their pants down.

 

[Ich]

Imagine being the world's second most powerful army, after mobilizing more than 300K mobiks and after "massive offensives" since several months you end up capturing 3 village, 85km² and some trees in Kreminna and 80% of those 85km² were the result of a PMC.

...and NATO is winning!

Why do you no more talking about Avdiivka?

 

[Ich]

rollin, rollin, rollin...

https://twitter.com/x/status/1637728442283180033

 

[ZeGerman]

...and NATO is winning!

Why do you no more talking about Avdiivka?

Cause russia mobilised 300.000 for its winter/spring offensive which so far is performing poorly?

Donbass, let alone full control zaporizhia/cherson provinces that were declared annexed is faaaaaar away.

gives russia little strategic depth for the coming ukranian counter offensive.

 

[Ich]

Cause russia mobilised 300.000 for its winter/spring offensive which so far is performing poorly?

Donbass, let alone full control zaporizhia/cherson provinces that were declared annexed is faaaaaar away.

gives russia little strategic depth for the coming ukranian counter offensive.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1637807555584880640

 

[kingQamaR]

Its an established narrative that one with offensive posture has to lose more then the one who is defender. Your narrative is also right we can only discuss the possibilities.

I will try to explain it further. Russians have more losses. To reduce that, instead of going rapidly into bakhmut they are using siege tactics to draw out Ukrainians. While Ukrainians have high zeal and no doubt they are getting the support or partial(Although there are reports that there is very limited support). This also explains that Ukrainians also want bakhmut to be the main focus for Russians to plan their offensive. Better to have full killing war at one side then at multiple fronts. So the Russians and Ukrainian are playing game of chess. Once the mysterious goal is achieved we will see either Russians entirely capturing it or leaving it withdrawing there troops which would only mean it was used as bait or they lost miserably.

Despite the loud statements of Russian propaganda, in reality the situation near Bakhmut was extremely difficult for the occupying forces. Trying to capture the city for several months, the best Russian units and PMC "Wagner" suffered heavy losses and may soon lose their offensive potential. After that, it will be much easier for the Armed Forces of Ukraine to defeat the remnants of the Russian army, battered by storms. This was stated in his Telegram channel by the former field commander of the "DNR", ex-officer of the Russian special services Strelkov-Girkin.

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1637809809599635457

https://twitter.com/x/status/1637810916031905792

 

[F-22Raptor]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1637830437362978817

 

[Ich]

March 2022: "Russia is running out of ammunition within two weeks!!!1!1!"

March 2023: Hold my beer!

https://twitter.com/x/status/1637825875340140548

 

[Solidify]

Somebody explain how does a operator of BMPT terminator tank see the target 2km away on flat land & in forest covered with trees ???
The way the Russians are targeting the Urkainians is from 2-3 km away.
So how does the precision targeting get covered in huge area ? Do the BMPT tank crews use aerial drones to visually see those targets or do they use sataillite to target on the ground linked with every BMPT unit communication system ? Any positive feedback appreciated ?

Russia pounds Bakhmut supply lines​

Source

 

[F-22Raptor]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1637831867020836870

 

[Ich]

"...bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb The Haque..."

https://twitter.com/x/status/1637833102079717377

 

[F-22Raptor]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1637841934910734338

 

[K_Bin_W]

...and NATO is winning!

Why do you no more talking about Avdiivka?

Oh yes NATO is winning alright - until the cows come home.