What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2


>> Rushi Sunak has become more of a damp squip than I expected, and even more than Olaf S of Germany ...

A weak minded - directionless - soft bean counter is the best i can say ( his inability / desire to get the N.Ireland, and dumping of EU laws being "additional" prime examples .. )..
 
Last edited:
Yes, As Taiwan is against Chinese aggression. it is a good example to learn them since they are better equipped than ukraine.
Don't think so. Geography there is a lot different.
And there will be little foreign help like NATO and US doing in case of Ukraine.
Besides Taiwan is part of China as per UN.
 
Don't think so. Geography there is a lot different.
And there will be little foreign help like NATO and US doing in case of Ukraine.
Besides Taiwan is part of China as per UN.
UN is a useless organization.... who does follow if they passed anything or say anything!!

I don't think because it is just not about Taiwan but Taiwan Strait and South china sea..

It will be more disastrous for CHina as same like Russia if they will try such a thing with Taiwan........
 
“In response of the criminal attack”

So russia starts a war of aggression and annexes and ethnically cleanses part of ukraine.
Ukraine fights back, including this artillery attack on what is basically a barrack of active invading soldiers in a warzone…

And it is “criminal” ??
The people you copy paste from twitter really are ridiculous.

Don't think so. Geography there is a lot different.
And there will be little foreign help like NATO and US doing in case of Ukraine.
Besides Taiwan is part of China as per UN.
Any amphibious invasion is no easy feat. Especially on the size of Taiwan.

Bombing from the mainland will also not “win hearts and minds”. So China needs either a total blockade or an amphibious landing, and for those to succeed, air and naval dominance.
In comes america with carrier strike groups….

Taiwan is an enormously risky move for the communist Party to take on militarily.


If the West was weak/soft in response on Putins invasion of Ukraine…China might have felt more emboldened to try.
 
“In response of the criminal attack”

So russia starts a war of aggression and annexes and ethnically cleanses part of ukraine.
Ukraine fights back, including this artillery attack on what is basically a barrack of active invading soldiers in a warzone…

And it is “criminal” ??
The people you copy paste from twitter really are ridiculous.


Any amphibious invasion is no easy feat. Especially on the size of Taiwan.

Bombing from the mainland will also not “win hearts and minds”. So China needs either a total blockade or an amphibious landing, and for those to succeed, air and naval dominance.
In comes america with carrier strike groups….

Taiwan is an enormously risky move for the communist Party to take on militarily.


If the West was weak/soft in response on Putins invasion of Ukraine…China might have felt more emboldened to try.


Russians are claiming they have killed 700 Ukrainian soldiers while pictures from the site show an abandoned building and a hole in front of the building,showing the Russians totally missed it, just showing you how much Russian claims are BS but of course their bootlickers do not need more than that to masturbate on this.


.
 
Looks like the US Congress will block aid to Zelensky regime after Kevin McCarthy was elected as the Speaker of the House. 👇


If thats what your Russian handlers tell you , yes lets hope thats the basis that the Russians build their 2023 war plan: another false hope.

Republians have a majority of 10 votes only in Congress. Of which 20 Congressman are the type that are Putin lovers or at least against Ukraine if only for the fact that its going well for US and they want to do everything Biden. The other 200 republicans are all more mainstream focused more on fiscal policy then a significant departure from foreign policy. For this wetdream you forwarded to work, all 200 republicans would have to be in the same camp as the 10-20 that were blocking nomination.

Senate: every bill has passed with broad bi-partisan support. But hese

The title and controlling statement do convey the essence of the paragraphs that follow.



If anything, it shows the desperation and the panic on the Western elite's minds. This is their war afterall. They engineered it from the get-go. And this panic and wake-up call do reveal how the situation looks bleak for the Ukrainians.

These former officials are also basically panicking that at the prospect of the West being defeated in Ukraine that is giving them nightmares.




Scott Ritter knows more about military and is more principled than you. I could careless what he did in his personal life.
So like you , Putin's war plan was based on Scott Ritter being a credible person? Nice.

“In response of the criminal attack”

So russia starts a war of aggression and annexes and ethnically cleanses part of ukraine.
Ukraine fights back, including this artillery attack on what is basically a barrack of active invading soldiers in a warzone…

And it is “criminal” ??
The people you copy paste from twitter really are ridiculous.


Any amphibious invasion is no easy feat. Especially on the size of Taiwan.

Bombing from the mainland will also not “win hearts and minds”. So China needs either a total blockade or an amphibious landing, and for those to succeed, air and naval dominance.
In comes america with carrier strike groups….

Taiwan is an enormously risky move for the communist Party to take on militarily.


If the West was weak/soft in response on Putins invasion of Ukraine…China might have felt more emboldened to try.
Amphibious landings are pretty much outdated because of their vulnerability to precision munitions much like parachuting troops en-masse. In Desert Storm, despite superior qualitative and quantitative advantage over Iraq, the US faked the idea of a sea assault on Kuwait to distract Iraqi army. They never had any intention to do it. This was when Iraq was fighting blind against the entire world essentially.

Imagine the lead time of Chinese ships/vessels/landing locations and the distance to be covered, I doubt Chinese subscribe to the WWII outdated doctrine that Russians seem to still following (in a ground war)
 
They are nothing alike except both are being Slavic (they are different Slavic group by the way) and both are orthodox. It's like saying Greek or Serbian are the same as Russian
Russians and ukranians are obviously very much alike. The closest people to each other. culturally, linguistically and racially.

There is nothing wrong with that. Its just a fact.

Another banger from the ministry of propaganda
This is not propaganda, This is actually 100% accurate. Sad but true.
 
Last edited:
1673204634552.png




hehehe 👇


Germans are now refusing to join their army. LMAO 👇

 
Russians and ukranians are obviously very much alike. The closest people to each other. culturally, linguistically and racially.

There is nothing wrong with that. Its just a fact.


This is not propaganda, This is actually 100% accurate. Sad but true.
Depends on what kind of Ukrainian you ask.

If you ask any Western Ukrainian, they will probably shot you now. If you ask any Ukrainian in the East, they will probably hit you in the face.

I would say culturally there are some similarities, but linguistically and racially most likely not. Ukrainian can't read Russian if they had not learnt Russian, but they can read Serbian even if they had no prior knowledge. Racially, Russia is more metro than Ukrainian, Russian have a lot of different ethnicities, from Slavs to Chechen to Cossack to Buryat (Mongolian) to Siberian (Eskimo) to Russian Chinese, and of course, Rus. While most Ukrainian are either Slav or Cossack.
 
Back
Top Bottom