What's new

Russia: Two Strategic Bombers Practice Nuclear Strikes Against U.S.

. . .
Jesus...

TU 95 is old soviet relic introduced back in 1956.
but B52 is "western superior" weapon introduced in 1955.

Double standards.Double western standars everywhere.

The attention seeking child, hey big country look at me I got some really old bombers with outdated tech, big country looks across and just ignores, little country gets angry and does it again, big country still ignores because its laughable.

Do you know,what will stop beign a great?
A Great Britain in few weeks.:rofl:
 
.
I dont understand why Russian defense planner feel that they will send their decades old Tu-95/etc to bomb US and and US will have to answer to it...Pathetic!
Cool down dude. These bombers are not inside US air space. They'll fire their nuke missiles from within Russian territory and therefore cannot be intercepted from mainland US.
 
.
Cool down dude. These bombers are not inside US air space. They'll fire their nuke missiles from within Russian territory and therefore cannot be intercepted from mainland US.
Russians already have land/sea based delivery systems to Nuke its enemy, then why show off with bombers? If I am not wrong, bombers are supposed to enter the enemy territory to get the task done! .
 
. . .
Russians already have land/sea based delivery systems to Nuke its enemy, then why show off with bombers? If I am not wrong, bombers are supposed to enter the enemy territory to get the task done! .
Not now. They do not have to enter enemy territory as they have developed stand off missiles with very long ranges. These bombers armed with long range nukes are specifically meant for a second strike. In a warlike situation before a war actually breaks out, these bombers would be airborne and fly within Russian air space, ready to respond in case of nuclear first strike by the US of A.

It's part of the Russian TRIAD.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom