What's new

Russia Surprised by Iranian S-300 Legal Complaint

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
Russia Surprised by Iranian S-300 Legal Complaint


Russia said Aug. 25 it was surprised by Iran's move to lodge a legal complaint against Moscow over the cancellation of an S-300 missile contract, insisting that sanctions had tied its hands.

Iran's ambassador to Moscow, Mahmoud Reza Sajjadi, announced on Aug. 24 that Tehran had lodged a complaint against Russia with an international court of arbitration, Russian news agencies reported.

He did not say which tribunal had been approached or if it involved the the International Court of Justice, which settles disputes between states.

Russia's state news agency RIA Novosti, quoting Sajjadi, said Iran had filed the complaint nearly half a year ago.

A Russian foreign ministry spokesman said Moscow took note of Iran's move but insisted it had had no choice but to cancel the long-agreed delivery of ground-to-air-missiles due to UN sanctions.

"Taking into account the traditionally friendly nature of bilateral ties, the fact that our Iranian partners have chosen this path cannot but cause surprise," the Interfax news agency quoted Alexander Lukashevich as saying.

"The fulfillment by the Russian side of the relevant contract has become impossible due to the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1929," Lukashevich said.

He added the two countries should look for ways to resolve contentious issues in a "mutually acceptable" manner.

Following the toughening of existing UN sanctions against Iran, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev last year signed a decree banning supplies of S-300 ground-to-air missiles and other arms to Iran.

The entire contract is estimated to be worth $800 million.

Top Iranian officials, including President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, have lashed out at Russia for canceling the S-300 deal.

Russia Surprised by Iranian S-300 Legal Complaint - Defense News
 
. .
Russia Surprised by Iranian S-300 Legal Complaint


Russia said Aug. 25 it was surprised by Iran's move to lodge a legal complaint against Moscow over the cancellation of an S-300 missile contract, insisting that sanctions had tied its hands.

Iran's ambassador to Moscow, Mahmoud Reza Sajjadi, announced on Aug. 24 that Tehran had lodged a complaint against Russia with an international court of arbitration, Russian news agencies reported.

He did not say which tribunal had been approached or if it involved the the International Court of Justice, which settles disputes between states.

Russia's state news agency RIA Novosti, quoting Sajjadi, said Iran had filed the complaint nearly half a year ago.

A Russian foreign ministry spokesman said Moscow took note of Iran's move but insisted it had had no choice but to cancel the long-agreed delivery of ground-to-air-missiles due to UN sanctions.

"Taking into account the traditionally friendly nature of bilateral ties, the fact that our Iranian partners have chosen this path cannot but cause surprise," the Interfax news agency quoted Alexander Lukashevich as saying.

"The fulfillment by the Russian side of the relevant contract has become impossible due to the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1929," Lukashevich said.

He added the two countries should look for ways to resolve contentious issues in a "mutually acceptable" manner.

Following the toughening of existing UN sanctions against Iran, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev last year signed a decree banning supplies of S-300 ground-to-air missiles and other arms to Iran.

The entire contract is estimated to be worth $800 million.

Top Iranian officials, including President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, have lashed out at Russia for canceling the S-300 deal.

Russia Surprised by Iranian S-300 Legal Complaint - Defense News

That is not how friends behave, cancel the S-300 contract just when your friend needs it the most. Iran is absolutely correct in suing the Russians.
 
. . .
Russia acted accordingly to UN Sec Counsil resolution. Iran cant do anything. Maybe sue the UN SC.
 
. .
Buddy, he is just doing what he does best. Start a thread which leads to a India - Pakistan or India - China flame war. All this while he rakes in the 'thanks' from Pakistanis and Chinese. Aadat se mazboor hai bachha.

then dont visit thread started by this bacha next time
 
.
Russia canceled the contract in function on it´s own interpretation of the resolution, not on technical obligations. So Iran has a legal base to sue Russia. Another argument, is if someone will give them attention... But legal right, they have.
 
.
Russia canceled the contract in function on it´s own interpretation of the resolution, not on technical obligations. So Iran has a legal base to sue Russia. Another argument, is if someone will give them attention... But legal right, they have.
Again you talk about things u have no clue about.

all States should prevent the transfer to Iran of any tanks, armoured combat vehicles, large-calibre artillery systems, attack helicopters, or missiles and related systems or parts.

Security Council Imposes Additional Sanctions on Iran, Voting 12 in Favour to 2 Against, with 1 Abstention

Iran still can sue UN though :lol:
 
. .
It´s you who does not understand, even unable to read properly:
"of any battle tanks, armoured combat vehicles, large calibre artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, missiles or missile systems as defined for the purpose of the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms"

From the Register´s terminology:
VII. Missiles and missile launchers

Guided or unguided rockets, ballistic or cruise missiles capable of delivering a warhead or weapon of destruction to a range of at least 25 kilometres, and means designed or modified specifically for launching such missiles or rockets, if not covered by categories I through VI. For the purpose of the Register, this category:

(a) Also includes remotely piloted vehicles with the characteristics for missiles as defined above;

(b) Does not include ground-to-air missiles.

S-300 is not categorised as an offensive weapon. Wether Russian officials consider it is another issue, but cancellation of the contract had no legal base.

Iran has not to sue UN, but Russia, which interpretated the resolution by it´s own.
 
. .
then dont visit thread started by this bacha next time

Why? Are you sponsoring him? This is a public forum. What we post is for public consumption and invites responses from anyone and everyone. You don't like my response to his post, that is your problem. Don't tell me what I should do or shouldn't do.
 
.
Why? Are you sponsoring him? This is a public forum. What we post is for public consumption and invites responses from anyone and everyone. You don't like my response to his post, that is your problem. Don't tell me what I should do or shouldn't do.

All your posts here are :offtopic::offtopic:
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom