What's new

Russia-India cooperation in 1971

King Solomon

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
2,990
Reaction score
0
1971 War: How Russia sank Nixon’s gunboat diplomacy




Exactly 40 years ago, India won a famous victory over Pakistan due to its brilliant soldiers, an unwavering political leadership, and strong diplomatic support from Moscow. Less well known is Russia’s power play that prevented a joint British-American attack on India.

Washington DC, December 3, 1971, 10:45am.

US President Richard Nixon is on the phone with Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, hours after Pakistan launched simultaneous attacks on six Indian airfields, a reckless act that prompted India to declare war.



Nixon: So West Pakistan giving trouble there.

Kissinger: If they lose half of their country without fighting they will be destroyed. They may also be destroyed this way but they will go down fighting.

Nixon: The Pakistan thing makes your heart sick. For them to be done so by the Indians and after we have warned the ***** (reference to Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi). Tell them that when India talks about West Pakistan attacking them it's like Russia claiming to be attacked by Finland.



Washington, December 10, 1971, 10:51am.

A week later the war is not going very well for Pakistan, as Indian armour scythes through East Pakistan and the Pakistan Air Force is blown out of the subcontinent’s sky. Meanwhile, the Pakistani military in the west is demoralised and on the verge of collapse as the Indian Army and Air Force attack round the clock.



Nixon: Our desire is to save West Pakistan. That's all.

Kissinger: That's right. That is exactly right.

Nixon: All right. Keep those carriers moving now.

Kissinger: The carriers—everything is moving. Four Jordanian planes have already moved to Pakistan, 22 more are coming. We're talking to the Saudis, the Turks we've now found are willing to give five. So we're going to keep that moving until there's a settlement.

Nixon: Could you tell the Chinese it would be very helpful if they could move some forces or threaten to move some forces?

Kissinger: Absolutely.

Nixon: They've got to threaten or they've got to move, one of the two. You know what I mean?

Kissinger: Yeah.

Nixon: How about getting the French to sell some planes to the Paks?

Kissinger: Yeah. They're already doing it.

Nixon: This should have been done long ago. The Chinese have not warned the Indians.

Kissinger: Oh, yeah.

Nixon: All they've got to do is move something. Move a division. You know, move some trucks. Fly some planes. You know, some symbolic act. We're not doing a goddamn thing, Henry, you know that.

Kissinger: Yeah.

Nixon: But these Indians are cowards. Right?

Kissinger: Right. But with Russian backing. You see, the Russians have sent notes to Iran, Turkey, to a lot of countries threatening them. The Russians have played a miserable game.



If the two American leaders were calling Indians cowards, a few months earlier the Indians were a different breed altogether. This phone call is from May 1971.

Nixon: The Indians need—what they need really is a—

Kissinger: They’re such bastards.

Nixon: A mass famine. But they aren't going to get that…But if they're not going to have a famine the last thing they need is another war. Let the goddamn Indians fight a war.

Kissinger: They are the most aggressive goddamn people around there.



The 1971 war is considered to be modern India’s finest hour, in military terms. The clinical professionalism of the Indian army, navy and air force; a charismatic brass led by the legendary Sam Maneckshaw; and ceaseless international lobbying by the political leadership worked brilliantly to set up a famous victory. After two weeks of vicious land, air and sea battles, nearly 100,000 Pakistani soldiers surrendered before India's rampaging army, the largest such capitulation since General Paulus' surrender at Stalingrad in 1943. However, it could all have come unstuck without help from veto-wielding Moscow, with which New Delhi had the foresight to sign a security treaty in 1970.



As Nixon’s conversations with the wily Kissinger show, the forces arrayed against India were formidable. The Pakistani military was being bolstered by aircraft from Jordan, Iran, Turkey and France. Moral and military support was amply provided by the US, China and the UK. Though not mentioned in the conversations here, the UAE sent in half a squadron of fighter aircraft and the Indonesians dispatched at least one naval vessel to fight alongside the Pakistani Navy.



However, Russia’s entry thwarted a scenario that could have led to multiple pincer movements against India.


Superpowers face-off

On December 10, even as Nixon and Kissinger were frothing at the mouth, Indian intelligence intercepted an American message, indicating that the US Seventh Fleet was steaming into the war zone. The Seventh Fleet, which was then stationed in the Gulf of Tonkin, was led by the 75,000 ton nuclear powered aircraft carrier, the USS Enterprise. The world’s largest warship, it carried more than 70 fighters and bombers. The Seventh Fleet also included the guided missile cruiser USS King, guided missile destroyers USS Decatur, Parsons and Tartar Sam, and a large amphibious assault ship USS Tripoli.



Standing between the Indian cities and the American ships was the Indian Navy’s Eastern Fleet led by the 20,000-ton aircraft carrier, Vikrant, with barely 20 light fighter aircraft. When asked if India’s Eastern Fleet would take on the Seventh Fleet, the Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Vice Admiral N. Krishnan, said: “Just give us the orders.” The Indian Air Force, having wiped out the Pakistani Air Force within the first week of the war, was reported to be on alert for any possible intervention by aircraft from the Enterprise.



Meanwhile, Soviet intelligence reported that a British naval group led by the aircraft carrier Eagle had moved closer to India’s territorial waters. This was perhaps one of the most ironic events in modern history where the Western world’s two leading democracies were threatening the world’s largest democracy in order to protect the perpetrators of the largest genocide since the Holocaust in Nazi Germany. However, India did not panic. It quietly sent Moscow a request to activate a secret provision of the Indo-Soviet security treaty, under which Russia was bound to defend India in case of any external aggression.



The British and the Americans had planned a coordinated pincer to intimidate India: while the British ships in the Arabian Sea would target India’s western coast, the Americans would make a dash into the Bay of Bengal in the east where 100,000 Pakistani troops were caught between the advancing Indian troops and the sea.



To counter this two-pronged British-American threat, Russia dispatched a nuclear-armed flotilla from Vladivostok on December 13 under the overall command of Admiral Vladimir Kruglyakov, the Commander of the 10th Operative Battle Group (Pacific Fleet). Though the Russian fleet comprised a good number of nuclear-armed ships and atomic submarines, their missiles were of limited range (less than 300 km). Hence to effectively counter the British and American fleets the Russian commanders had to undertake the risk of encircling them to bring them within their target. This they did with military precision.



In an interview to a Russian TV programme after his retirement, Admiral Kruglyakov, who commanded the Pacific Fleet from 1970 to 1975, recalled that Moscow ordered the Russian ships to prevent the Americans and British from getting closer to “Indian military objects”. The genial Kruglyakov added: “The Chief Commander’s order was that our submarines should surface when the Americans appear. It was done to demonstrate to them that we had nuclear submarines in the Indian Ocean. So when our subs surfaced, they recognised us. In the way of the American Navy stood the Soviet cruisers, destroyers and atomic submarines equipped with anti-ship missiles. We encircled them and trained our missiles at the Enterprise. We blocked them and did not allow them to close in on Karachi, Chittagong or Dhaka."



At this point, the Russians intercepted a communication from the commander of the British carrier battle group, Admiral Dimon Gordon, to the Seventh Fleet commander: “Sir, we are too late. There are the Russian atomic submarines here, and a big collection of battleships.” The British ships fled towards Madagascar while the larger US task force stopped before entering the Bay of Bengal.



The Russian manoeuvres clearly helped prevent a direct clash between India and the US-UK combine. Newly declassified documents reveal that the Indian Prime Minister went ahead with her plan to liberate Bangladesh despite inputs that the Americans had kept three battalions of Marines on standby to deter India, and that the American aircraft carrier USS Enterprise had orders to target the Indian Army, which had broken through the Pakistani Army’s defences and was thundering down the highway to the gates of Lahore, West Pakistan’s second largest city.



According to a six-page note prepared by India's foreign ministry, "The bomber force aboard the Enterprise had the US President's authority to undertake bombing of the Indian Army's communications, if necessary."


China in the box



Despite Kissinger’s goading and desperate Pakistani calls for help, the Chinese did nothing. US diplomatic documents reveal that Indira Gandhi knew the Soviets had factored in the possibility of Chinese intervention. According to a cable referring to an Indian cabinet meeting held on December 10, “If the Chinese were to become directly involved in the conflict, Indira Gandhi said, the Chinese know that the Soviet Union would act in the Sinkiang region. Soviet air support may be made available to India at that time.”



Interestingly, while the cable is declassified, the source and extensive details of the Indian Prime Minister’s briefing remain classified. “He is a reliable source” is all that the document says. There was very clearly a cabinet level mole the Americans were getting their information from.


Intolerable hatred




On December 14, General A.A.K. Niazi, Pakistan's military commander in East Pakistan, told the American consul-general in Dhaka that he was willing to surrender. The message was relayed to Washington, but it took the US 19 hours to relay it to New Delhi. Files suggest senior Indian diplomats suspected the delay was because Washington was possibly contemplating military action against India.



Kissinger went so far as to call the crisis “our Rhineland” a reference to Hitler’s militarisation of German Rhineland at the outset of World War II. This kind of powerful imagery indicates how strongly Kissinger and Nixon came to see Indians as a threat.



An Indian University study of the conflict says: “The violation of human rights on a massive scale—described in a March 30 US cable as “selective genocide”—and the complete disregard for democracy were irrelevant to Nixon and Kissinger. In fact, the non-democratic aspects of Pakistani dictator Yahya Khan’s behaviour seemed to be what impressed them the most. As evidence mounted of military atrocities in East Pakistan, Nixon and Kissinger remained unmoved. In a Senior Review Group meeting, Kissinger commented at news of significant casualties at a university that, ‘The British didn’t dominate 400 million Indians all those years by being gentle’.”



Nixon and Kissinger phoned Soviet President Leonid Brezhnev and asked for guarantees that India would not attack West Pakistan. “Nixon was ready to link the future summit in Moscow to Soviet behaviour on this issue," writes professor Vladislav M. Zubok in A Failed Empire. "The Soviets could not see why the White House supported Pakistan, who they believed had started the war against India. Brezhnev, puzzled at first, was soon enraged. In his narrow circle, he even suggested giving India the secret of the atomic bomb. His advisers did their best to kill this idea. Several years later, Brezhnev still reacted angrily and spoke spitefully about American behaviour."


Cold Warriors



Another telephone conversation between the scheming duo reveals a lot about the mindset of those at the highest echelons of American decision making:

Kissinger: And the point you made yesterday, we have to continue to squeeze the Indians even when this thing is settled.

Nixon: We've got to for rehabilitation. I mean, Jesus Christ, they've bombed—I want all the war damage; I want to help Pakistan on the war damage in Karachi and other areas, see?

Kissinger: Yeah

Nixon: I don't want the Indians to be happy. I want a public relations programme developed to piss on the Indians.

Kissinger: Yeah.

Nixon: I want to piss on them for their responsibility. Get a white paper out. Put down, White paper. White paper. Understand that?

Kissinger: Oh, yeah.

Nixon: I don't mean for just your reading. But a white paper on this.

Kissinger: No, no. I know.

Nixon: I want the Indians blamed for this, you know what I mean? We can't let these goddamn, sanctimonious Indians get away with this. They've pissed on us on Vietnam for 5 years, Henry.

Kissinger: Yeah.

Nixon: Aren't the Indians killing a lot of these people?

Kissinger: Well, we don't know the facts yet. But I'm sure they're not as stupid as the West Pakistanis—they don't let the press in. The idiot Paks have the press all over their place.


1971 War: How Russia sank Nixon

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
awsome, we will teach the americans a lesson with time. they always stopped us from developing. we will treat them like **** the day we become the largest economy of the world.
 
. .

Admiral Vladimir Kruglyakov

КРУГЛЯКОВ Владимир Сергеевич, Вице-адмирал.

Vice admiral (at that time), commander of the 10th operational squadron, pacific fleet.

image003_0007.jpg
 
.
nice article, this shows how dangerous the situation was in 1971 & what courage both our leadership & military showed. It also makes case for India to have nuclear powered submarines, ICBM's etc. since we never know when our strategic partner US turns the gun on us. At that moment they should know that we are more than ready for them this time.
 
.
I found this part funny. I have seen similar attitude of some people here on the forum... Everybody seems to underestimate Indians when actually they are very good at foreign policy/diplomacy.

Nixon: But these Indians are cowards. Right?

Kissinger: Right. But with Russian backing. You see, the Russians have sent notes to Iran, Turkey, to a lot of countries threatening them. The Russians have played a miserable game.
 
.
This was perhaps one of the most ironic events in modern history where the Western world’s two leading democracies were threatening the world’s largest democracy in order to protect the perpetrators of the largest genocide since the Holocaust in Nazi Germany.

This perhaps is the reason why many Indians still dont trust USA and UK when it comes to foreign policy...

But thank you Russia for backing us even when u too were facing massive diplomatic pressure not to support us....

And Good job Indira and her cabinet for having the b@lls to take the risk and more importantly executing everything right...

Now-a-days u dont see that type of courage in any political leader across all parties..
 
.
Hats off to USSR/Russia for their help whenever India needed it the most. India has to be blamed somewhere for not standing with our best well-wisher over the years instead siding with US lately but that's where self interest leads one to.
 
.
This perhaps is the reason why many Indians still dont trust USA and UK when it comes to foreign policy...

But thank you Russia for backing us even when u too were facing massive diplomatic pressure not to support us....

And Good job Indira and her cabinet for having the b@lls to take the risk and more importantly executing everything right...

Now-a-days u dont see that type of courage in any political leader across all parties..
The 1971 war changed the history of sub continent, if it hadn't been for the soviets we would have fought with yanks for the first time in history wonder how thing's would have turned out.

the 1971 war was the finest movement for Indian armed forces when all three services performed in a clinical fashion.
Let it be a warning to all those elements who have an hostile intent against as that republic of India will not bow down to any nation and formulate policy which are best interest of Indian.
Bharat mata ki jai .
 
.
The Russians have always been good friends and brothers.:tup:

This is also the reason why we never would trust the USA fully and will always act in our own interest when it comes to the Americans. Right now, our interests to coincide, but we can never be sure when the Americans will turn on us. (We can already see what's happening with :pakistan: right now)

Rest assured, gone are the days when we would bow down to any foreign power and be caught unprepared. Jai Hind!
 
.
Awesome thread. Thanks for sharing.

It's funny, this thread gives off vibes that the present day India resembles that of a fat old man in the bar reminiscing about his interesting life in his younger days, to overcome the reality of how impotent and bald he has become. With the faggot PM all set to hand over Siachen, the future looks bleak for rightful confrontations like the 1971 war.

There was very clearly a cabinet level mole the Americans were getting their information from.
Manmohan Singh was the Chief Economic Adviser back then with close links with the cabinet.
 
.
As Nixon’s conversations with the wily Kissinger show, the forces arrayed against India were formidable. The Pakistani military was being bolstered by aircraft from Jordan, Iran, Turkey and France. Moral and military support was amply provided by the US, China and the UK. Though not mentioned in the conversations here, the UAE sent in half a squadron of fighter aircraft and the Indonesians dispatched at least one naval vessel to fight alongside the Pakistani Navy.

very interesting information ... :coffee:
 
.
Hats off to USSR/Russia for their help whenever India needed it the most. India has to be blamed somewhere for not standing with our best well-wisher over the years instead siding with US lately but that's where self interest leads one to.
Hey what did India do mate to have gone against it's age old allies diplomacy is not zero sum affair .
India formulates policy which is in best interest of India no need to get your ego involved.
 
.
Hats off to USSR/Russia for their help whenever India needed it the most. India has to be blamed somewhere for not standing with our best well-wisher over the years instead siding with US lately but that's where self interest leads one to.

well it depends.
neither indian govt nor the common man has forgotten what russia has done for india. when india didnt know how to make missiles, rockers, computers, nuclear reactors or anything complex, they trained our scientists and now india is selfsufficient in every critical tech.

they helped us establish our prestegious iits. we owe them a lot.

but todays scenerio is that usa is the worlds largest economy and india is worlds 3rd largest and 2nd fastest growing major economy while russia is facing a problems of collapsing population and not so booming economy. moreover india is now ahead of russia in everything except military hardware and should be on par with them within a decade.

trade and closer relations between india and usa are inevitable to rise. but if russia faces any problems in this century whether economically or militarily, india will be always take its back over backstabber usa.
 
.
Awesome thread. Thanks for sharing.

It's funny, this thread gives off vibes that the present day India resembles that of a fat old man in the bar reminiscing about his interesting life in his younger days, to overcome the reality of how impotent and bald he has become. With the faggot PM all set to hand over Siachen, the future looks bleak for rightful confrontations like the 1971 war.


Manmohan Singh was the Chief Economic Adviser back then with close links with the cabinet.

wow ur a full blown idiot.. seriously.... bro get some treatment.

political leadership in india is as strong as it was back then. we have not had any major wars for a long time, so now we have warmth and calmness in our country.

what do u mean by future looks bleak for 1971???? u want another war??? r u serious??

calling manmohan singh faggot shows what a clownface you are. he is responsible for everything india has achieved in last 20 yrs. u need to understand how indian defence forces and leadership work in coordination with each other to ensure peace and security and this is the reason why we r ready to cooperate over siachin with pak. if any war breaks out again 1971 will be repeated.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom