What's new

Russia blames CIA special forces for Nord Stream 1 attack to cripple Germany economically so Airbus cannot compete with Boeing

the north stream 2 is dead. German gov wants to use the pipeline for other purposes. One idea is using it for transport of Lng gas sourced from other countries. Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, I don’t know, Indonesia.
The sabotage most likely is initiated by Moscow. Putin probably thinks if he can’t have it he destroys it. Like an angry child in kindergarten.

How do you use north stream 2 to transport natural gas from Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Indonesia?

I didn't expect that Germans would choose to deceive themselves when their sovereignty was violated.

In fact, everyone here knows who did it. Your excuse will only make people feel pitiful and ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
.
.
How do you use north stream 2 to transport natural gas from Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Indonesia?

I didn't expect that Germans would choose to deceive themselves when their sovereignty was violated.

In fact, everyone here knows who did it. Your excuse will only make people feel pitiful and ridiculous.

Germany has political, economic, security commitments through NATO and EU to other European states. Russia is the offender here
 
.
How do you use north stream 2 to transport natural gas from Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Indonesia?

I didn't expect that Germans would choose to deceive themselves when their sovereignty was violated.

In fact, everyone here knows who did it. Your excuse will only make people feel pitiful and ridiculous.
You believe people here sit idle waiting to freeze to death in winter? No my friend, not all people are dumb as you believe.
How to use north stream 2 for Lng imports?

very easy

Germany can nationalize the pipeline, like she does in the case of Gazprom and Nosneft. Build Lng terminals in the ocean. Gas tankers can unload the fuels. The pipeline will be disconnected from Russia, then connect the pipe at one end to terminals and reroute the other end to Germany mainland. 5 Lng terminals are under construction.

 
. .
Ukraine has no courage or ability to harm the interests of the EU.

Only the USA and Ukraine have benefited from this, and the USA is the only country capable of doing that.
Chinese have benefited from cheap gas with their no 'limits' friendship. They need the cheap gas given the big property bailout that will be needed and 70% of household wealth is locked up in the collapsing property sector as the ultimate ponzi scheme...
 
.
Poland is not only unable to do this, but it will actually undermine Poland's security interests in the long run.

In fact, this is not only damaging and humiliating Germany's sovereignty, but also a major blow to the necessity of EU existence. The energy crisis and the devaluation of the euro have proved that Germany is unable to protect the economic security of EU countries. The Nord Stream incident has proved that Germany is unable to protect the sovereign security of EU countries. Germany could not even protect its own sovereignty.


If the EU cannot guarantee economic and sovereign security. What is the reason for EU countries to continue to unite under the flag of Germany? If the EU splits, it will severely damage Poland's security interests.

Even if Poland wanted to destroy Nord Stream, it would still be after the end of the Ukrainian war, not now.
No, I think this is actually a good thing for Europe as a whole as I said before in another thread. Only a fool will depend completely on its adversary/enemy/rival for its most critical needs like energy/power . (Its like CHINA depending on the US for majority of its crucial energy needs just because its abit cheaper, do you see how stupid that sounds?)This puts you at the mercy of your adversary/ blackmail and puts all the leverage in your adversary hands .
Europe should have never depended on Russia for the vast majority of its energy needs in the first place. 🙄 even if it means we have to pay more for energy, we will still have adjusted to that new normal and get used to it, wouldn't be the end of the world. Europe has faced far more hardship than this and came out in a better shape. In fact this is not even that bad compared to other crisis to be honest. After all Russia is not the only country in the world with oil/gas etc. Russia will face even more economic issues going forward since their main exports is natural resources.
The thing is Europe can live without Russian gas , europe wasn't always so dependent on Russian gas, europe started dependingon russian gas more after the cold war since they believed Russias didnt pose anymore threat and Russian gas was cheaper and readily available so countries started flocking to russian gas. During the cold war , dependence on Russian gas was minimal at best and we still lived , survived and prospered. As I said , necessity will always make you create alternatives and create a new normal. European countries got too complacent with Russia due to a long period of peace in Europe, this led to complacency and even laziness of thinking on crucial matters like this. It's actually a good thing that Russia's invasion of Georgia, annexation of Crimea(which kinda shook Europe ABIT, but not enough for them to fully wave up ) and subsequent invasion of Ukraine was the final wake up call other European countries(who were still holding an illusion of a positive view of Russia long needed to wake up from.tjeir illusions. This will be good for Europe long term , as Europe seems to have woken up to the need to make tough decisions and suffer short term pain for long term gain vis a vis Moscow , and get rid of any energy leverage and blackmail Russia has over Europe. Once this is gone, Russia won't have much leeway to blackmail Europe thus less leverage. Which will be good for Europe and subsequently geopolitically for the region.
 
Last edited:
.
No, I think this is actually a good thing for Europe as a whole as I said before in another thread. Only a fool will depend completely on its adversary/enemy/rival for its most critical needs like energy/power . (Its like CHINA depending on the US for majority of its crucial energy needs just because its abit cheaper, do you see how stupid that sounds?)This puts you at the mercy of your adversary/ blackmail and puts all the leverage in your adversary hands .
Europe should have never depended on Russia for the vast majority of its energy needs in the first place. 🙄 even if it means we have to pay more for energy, we will still have adjusted to that new normal and get used to it, wouldn't be the end of the world. Europe has faced far more hardship than this and came out in a better shape. In fact this is not even that bad compared to other crisis to be honest. After all Russia is not the only country in the world with oil/gas etc. Russia will face even more economic issues going forward since their main exports is natural resources.
The thing is Europe can live without Russian gas , europe wasn't always so dependent on Russian gas, europe started dependingon russian gas more after the cold war since they believed Russias didnt pose anymore threat and Russian gas was cheaper and readily available so countries started flocking to russian gas. During the cold war , dependence on Russian gas was minimal at best and we still lived , survived and prospered. As I said , necessity will always make you create alternatives and create a new normal. European countries got too complacent with Russia due to a long period of peace in Europe, this led to complacency and even laziness of thinking on crucial matters like this. Its good that Russia's invasion of Georgia, annexation of Crimea(which kinda shook Europe ABIT, but not enough for them to fully wave up ) and subsequent invasion of Ukraine was the final wake up call we long needed. This will be good fir Europe long term , as Europe seems to have woken up to the need to maje tough decisions and suffer short term pain for long term gain , and get rid if any energy leverage and blackmail Russia has over Europe. Once this us gone, Russia won't have much leeway to blackmail Europe thus less leverage.
We're talking about who blew up Nord Stream. Or do you mean the European Parliament bombed Nord Stream?
 
.
Come to think of it now, US has much to gain from this as well. Albeit, not the reasons mentioned by OP.

We all know the gas supplies to the EU have been keeping the Russian war machine going in terms of money. Granted, they have been waning off, but are still a significant amount. The US could not force the the EU to shut the gas off as quickly as it wanted, and Russia also did not want a total halt of gas supplies, after all, they have to fund the war.

So how else could the US stop Russia getting money from the EU, and stop the supplies? ;)
It would make sense only if the pipeline is active and delivering gas to EU, Russia suspended gas delivery from Nord stream 1 and 2 since last month, it does not make sense to sabotage an empty gas pipeline,

 
.
.
I doubt the Chinese could get a vessel into those waters for such a mission. As for the UK, it has the most to lose.

Please keep in mind a small team can use just about any vessel out there. It does not have to be a Navy vessel.
 
. .
They were shut down, with a valve or so to say.
But as leverage, they had the option to provide the region with what they want, so this is a bigger card than burning your bridges and leaving no way to make money from the other region. A major card to play in negotiations, but once that is gone, other options are going to be more expensive on both parties. (But how desperate they will be time will tell)

Edit: another thing to note is that USS Kearsarge with her group was in the region and the timing and waterways she needs to take kind of coincide 100%

A small team from any country can use just about any vessel out there.
 
. .
It make sense to sabotage an empty gas pipeline, so it doesn't get restarted ....
well, it wouldn't make sense because unless it is completely destroyed, otherwise you can fix it, whether or not you want to restart delivery of gas is an administrative decision, as in whether you want to buy gas/oil from Russia. If the EU don't want to buy oil and gas from Russia is because they want independent energy source, not because of the pipeline is broken.

On the other hand, that pipeline is empty, that mean Russia is earning nothing from it, if this get sabotaged, there will be an insurance payout for the Russian company that own that pipeline.

On the other hand, what US can benefit from? EU are going to get US oil and gas because Russia is not giving them, and EU are not going to depends on US oil and gas just because NS1 and 2 got sabotaged.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom