Russia at International Defence Exhibition and Seminar (IDEAS) 2014 in Karachi.

[he-man]

Not really, there are some glaring mistakes in their database on weapons. On the other hand, global security is also of the same stature and they list the Aspide Mk1 and mk.2 missiles( Aspide 2000 is an upgrade to these with a larger motor) having a ceiling of 8000m from launch point.. so I would tend to take that seriously. Add to that the manufacturers testament on the newer Aspide



That gives a rather respectable ceiling and ability to engage most aircraft.

The tests in qatar intercepted targets at 1500 m altitudes.

 

[Bilal.]

both system have their own advantages .. Pantsir with Mobility , high altitude capability is good for tank columns defence

while spada have better radar , tracking and engaging but at fixed point defence provide it as a ultimate weapon of choice

Pantsir is not a good option for tank formation defence. Its more of a last ditch defence of high value targets. Tor on the other hand is perfect for the job.

 

[Sulman Badshah]

The tests in qatar intercepted targets at 1500 m altitudes.

similar aspide SAR gives 15 km of altitude
3.5 km isn't a logical figure

spada 2000 altitude isn't confirm by manufacturer yet ... can't trust on other sources

 

[aliaselin]

Spada gives no values and deagel gives 3.5

This is definitely wrong. Our official data for ly60(aspide) is 12km. aspide 2000 should be no less than this number

 

[aliaselin]

Pantsir is not a good option for tank formation defence. Its more of a last ditch defence of high value targets. Tor on the other hand is perfect for the job.

right. russian use it for combination with s400, to protect the radar of s400

 

[Bilal.]

right. russian use it for combination with s400, to protect the radar of s400

Plus, Pantsir's simultaneous engagement capability is limited to just 1 target. Tor provides 360 degree coverage (VLS) and engagement of 4 targets at the same time.

 

[he-man]

This is definitely wrong. Our official data for ly60(aspide) is 12km. aspide 2000 should be no less than this number

ly 60 has max altitude of 5 km or 5000m

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-Div-ADS.html:coffee:

@Oscar

 

[he-man]

similar aspide SAR gives 15 km of altitude
3.5 km isn't a logical figure

spada 2000 altitude isn't confirm by manufacturer yet ... can't trust on other sources

ly 60 which is a copy of aspide mk1 has 5 km ceiling.
PLA Mechanised Infantry Division Air Defence Systems / PLAPoint Defence Systems

 

[Sulman Badshah]

ly 60 which is a copy of aspide mk1 has 5 km ceiling.
PLA Mechanised Infantry Division Air Defence Systems / PLAPoint Defence Systems

please give any manufacturer link /.... there are news stating 0.3- 12 km

like this link
LY-60 / PL-10

 

[he-man]

please give any manufacturer link /.... there are news stating 0.3- 12 km

like this link
LY-60 / PL-10

Too much confusion

 

[airmarshal]

All of a sudden, Russian weapons have become 'trash' for Indian members.

 

[SQ8]

ly 60 has max altitude of 5 km or 5000m

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-Div-ADS.html:coffee:

@Oscar

Ly-60 is a copy of Aspide Mk.1 Please re read my quote from the OEM..

 

[SQ8]

The tests in qatar intercepted targets at 1500 m altitudes.

The tests in Pakistan too were focused on the low altitude threat. But the tests in Kuwait were not, see quote from OEM.

 

[he-man]

The tests in Pakistan too were focused on the low altitude threat. But the tests in Kuwait were not, see quote from OEM.

News shows 1500m.See that urself.

 

[SQ8]

News shows 1500m.See that urself.

Qatar, not Kuwait. Please check OEM. I see no news link.