Hey buddy look, KSA and Iran have been threatening each other for quite a long time, Iran has better defense ties with India then Pakistan, Afghanistan Pakistan dont get along, Turkey and Syria are showing some hostility so which Ummah is Zaid Hamid talking about?
first of all come to basics.concept of ummah is not given by zaid hamid.it is given by Messenger of Allah (saw).ok.
now what ever you have written above its true.but see the other side of picture in 65 war Turks,Arabs and Indonesian,Malysian came for our help.in 1998 after nuclear blast when we sanctioned Saudies gave us oil.why?they were our cousins?why we love Turks and why they love us?because of this ummah concept.
if europeans who cut the throats of each other for centuries if they can join hands just for the sake of economic reasons why we cannot form greater alliance?khilafat and ummah is sunni concept so please there is no need of Iran in any future alliance.Because Iranians dont go well with us,Turks and arabs.you mentioned syria and Turkey and there current tension.but why you forget history?From how much long asad and his family ruling syria?how much % are they of Syrain population?
in our region.Afghanis took shots at us by placing rifle at indian shoulders.you know the fundamental policy of indians?
simple if you want to be regional power you should become enemy to your immediate neighbour and make friend with countries who next to your neighbour.in our case we are there enemy and Afghan and Iranian are there friends.same is the case with Chinese,they have enemity with them but friendship with Russians. (Ktlya Chankia)
so if we want to make any move,wana make any alliance we have to take out India first.
It is a Hadis that their will be 73 sects in Islam so their will be and their is nothing you can do about it to change it. Lets put it this way, ever single Muslim state is like a different sect meaning non of them are on the right path. Their is suppose to be only one Khalifa and Mehdi will establish it very soon.
this is the problem.this hadith create a lot problem and confusion to people with limited knowledge.
Shah wali ullah reh.a mentioned all these sects.do ever read the Imam of four fiqah.if no read them you will find more differences (apparently) in them than in barelvi,deobandi,salfis.so where exactly is the problem?answer is limited knowledge.
deobandis and salfis say barelvis worship graves but tell me if ordinary illitrate person perform an act of jahalat does scholars are responsible for it.i know barelvies cross limits many times but still you cannot accuse father for the mistake of his son.
people chant there are differences b/w deobandi and barelvi,do you know what exactly are differences?miraj,ilm e ghaib na.
there are books from deobandi ulema like taq wia tul iman that create alot of differences.although this thing can be reversed if all agree on believes of imdad ullah mahajar makki and shah wali ullah sahab.
barelvis,deobandies and salfis does not qualify to be called a sect.they fall another category.there is a hadith for that category where prophet of Allah said "differences are blessings".
there are other people who qualify for sects like ahmadies,muhtazilla,khawarij,mulhid etc.
Btw your reply pretty much dodged Zaid Hamid's video which shows that he is a Saudi's boot licker. Like i said, your posts regarding KSA is quite self contradictory to what SIR LION KING zaid Hamid preaches to confused youth.
there are few things in zaid hamid that i like.nothing more than that.
