Romeo loved just one lady,while LORD Krishna was a legendary Eve teaser Bhushan on antiRomeo squad

[ranjeet]

Imagine that. What a narrow escape from being called presumptuous.

What can I say, had to give a graceful way out to one of our elder. You can blame my Sanghi upbringing for that, I won't mind. Although have to say, this one was quite easy.

 

[Joe Shearer]

What can I say, had to give a graceful way out to one of our elder. You can blame my Sanghi upbringing for that, I won't mind. Although have to say, this one was quite easy.

For a born genius and a deft artist and word-smith like you, this must have been child's play. But no doubt some bits were difficult.

Did you have a constricted feeling around your underpants trying to stay non-Sanghi in your language?

 

[duhastmish]

To progress one has to question. Why do we make religion such a taboo. Why cant we come out and discuss it in a civilized manner.
Its personal yet a public subject. You hsve your version or virtue i have mine. Such a pioneering subject is kept under locks.

What krishna did were not the lovers follies but a male chuvenist thing. And we made him do it because its a mythology. We thought its ok to act in such manners.

Education and developments can not grow a society. His upbring and social fabric does. The current situation of india proves that.

 

[Joe Shearer]

I put that comment of Mulayam to see the reaction from you and reconfirm your thinking.

Communists like you and Bhushan would not even hesitate to equate Krishna with low life rapists.

This demonstrates how low can communists go to achieve their goal of destroying India.

LOL.

1. It is only low-life like a casteist leader such as Mulayam Singh Yadav who would justify rape and murder on the grounds that boys will be boys. To call him a communist is ridiculous in itself; to equate his caste-based regressive behaviour with anything progressive-minded is even more ridiculous. There is not much of an analogy.
2. Prashant Bhushan may or may not be a Communist. Other than your frothing-at-the-mouth broadcasts, I haven't heard of this anywhere else.
3. I certainly am not one, and have opposed the CPM in Bengal, not as a party, but as advocates of violence, the Naxalites in particular as advocates of viciously conducted anti-constitutional action. Your fancies may take you wherever you wish, but these wild-eyed charges are quite typical of a fascist mentality, a mentality that labels something or somebody as anti-national (nationalism being a vital component of the politically accurate definition of fascism) and then uses that labelling wherever required to make a point without having to use that very inconvenient thing called evidence. As in this case.
4. Bhushan, from newspaper accounts and the reading of the tweets in question, did not equate Krishna with low-life rapists; he stated that Krishna's behaviour might have attracted the attention of the Anti-Romeo squads of today. So concentrate, don't let the bile rise to your head; there is enough of that there already.

I was fascinated to read the crap that you put out in your attached answer to somebody else. Apparently in your view, any convoluted language is good enough to justify anything that is remotely linked to what you consider the core of your religious belief. In all other cases, the same viewpoint, the same logic, the same reasoning does not apply. Even a benefit of the doubt cannot be extended, forget about the wholesale whitewashing that you resort to. It must have taken a great deal of study and effort to concoct the bizarre arguments you have put out.

Don't bother to reply. This avatar of yours is also now on my ignore list. Au revoir.

 

[StraightShooter]

LOL.

1. It is only low-life like a casteist leader such as Mulayam Singh Yadav who would justify rape and murder on the grounds that boys will be boys. To call him a communist is ridiculous in itself; to equate his caste-based regressive behaviour with anything progressive-minded is even more ridiculous. There is not much of an analogy.
2. Prashant Bhushan may or may not be a Communist. Other than your frothing-at-the-mouth broadcasts, I haven't heard of this anywhere else.
3. I certainly am not one, and have opposed the CPM in Bengal, not as a party, but as advocates of violence, the Naxalites in particular as advocates of viciously conducted anti-constitutional action. Your fancies may take you wherever you wish, but these wild-eyed charges are quite typical of a fascist mentality, a mentality that labels something or somebody as anti-national (nationalism being a vital component of the politically accurate definition of fascism) and then uses that labelling wherever required to make a point without having to use that very inconvenient thing called evidence. As in this case.
4. Bhushan, from newspaper accounts and the reading of the tweets in question, did not equate Krishna with low-life rapists; he stated that Krishna's behaviour might have attracted the attention of the Anti-Romeo squads of today. So concentrate, don't let the bile rise to your head; there is enough of that there already.

I was fascinated to read the crap that you put out in your attached answer to somebody else. Apparently in your view, any convoluted language is good enough to justify anything that is remotely linked to what you consider the core of your religious belief. In all other cases, the same viewpoint, the same logic, the same reasoning does not apply. Even a benefit of the doubt cannot be extended, forget about the wholesale whitewashing that you resort to. It must have taken a great deal of study and effort to concoct the bizarre arguments you have put out.

Don't bother to reply. This avatar of yours is also now on my ignore list. Au revoir.

There was a time communists and anti-Hindu elements propagated the idea that Hinduism and Hindu gods are nothing but a myth.

Once that line of thought fell flat they started this new movement to demonize and malign the Hindu gods. Do you think Hindus cannot see through these games?

You claim to be an atheist but could not resist to make fun of Hinduism. Will you do the same for Christianity or Islam? Certainly not.

Your atheism is not based on your intellect but due to your hate towards Hinduism and fear towards Islam

Those who read books with the purpose of only maligning would never understand the meaning of those scriptures.

I have done my part of Karma but putting it here. It is up to the readers to learn or ridicule it.

A person with superfluous knowledge may be able to score petty points on a forum but would never attain moksham. I do not worry but when you are on your death bed, this post of mine would haunt you for your misdeeds.

 

[911]

He was so irked with the use of Romeo that he had to drag Hindu gods into this.

 

[SoulSpokesman]

Dada,

The use of historian perhaps was out of place- I had no intention of putting Lord K in history and give fuel to my fellow travellers (not that they need any). I guess I was out of words- mythologist didnt sound write. Couldnt help that the word historian is the first word that comes to mind when I have to describe you. On second thoughts perhaps Polymath wud be a better description. Thanks for the account of Lord K's death by the way.

Regards

PS: I am curious to know why Adil bhai is on your ignore list. He seems to be a decent sort of bloke.

 

[Ashesh]

I'd still want legal action against this Dolt.

https://twitter.com/x/status/849107279823515648

 

[ranjeet]

I'd still want legal action against this Dolt.

https://twitter.com/x/status/849107279823515648

Second that, this old fart must be brought to justice.

 

[adil_minhas]

Dada,

The use of historian perhaps was out of place- I had no intention of putting Lord K in history and give fuel to my fellow travellers (not that they need any). I guess I was out of words- mythologist didnt sound write. Couldnt help that the word historian is the first word that comes to mind when I have to describe you. On second thoughts perhaps Polymath wud be a better description. Thanks for the account of Lord K's death by the way.

Regards

PS: I am curious to know why Adil bhai is on your ignore list. He seems to be a decent sort of bloke.

Thanks bro.

Initially I was rude to him. Early days when I joined last year.

I did not know he was so old and respected buzurg here. I would like the chance to apologize to him directly.

I thought he was a communist. Then a sanghi. Now I am totally confused.

Kudos.

male chuvenist thing.

That's being polite.

I know the bow and arrow armed adivasis did not see me as a "male chauvinist" when I tried to do somewhat the same thing many millennia later.

 

[foxtrot1]

I'd still want legal action against this Dolt.

https://twitter.com/x/status/849107279823515648

He knows it that he has said it in a very disrespecting manner. He can't just escape it by making such clarification.

 

[Ashesh]

He knows it that he has said it in a very disrespecting manner. He can't just escape it by making such clarification.

BJP is not leaving this matter after him tendering apology. They are taking this in court of law. I hope this Yakub Lover Dolt, rots in Jail like Kamlesh Tiwari.

 

[SoulSpokesman]

Adil bhai,

I know Dada for over half a decade now, across three different forums under at least half a dozen nic- I have had the pleasure of meeting him in person too. He is a liberal in the genuine sense of the term, not the Lootyens liberal that you see and read on the mainstream media or saw hanging around in the Shroud's kitchen cabinet aka NAC.

Regards

 

[adil_minhas]

Adil bhai,

I know Dada for over half a decade now, across three different forums under at least half a dozen nic- I have had the pleasure of meeting him in person too. He is a liberal in the genuine sense of the term, not the Lootyens liberal that you see and read on the mainstream media or saw hanging around in the Shroud's kitchen cabinet aka NAC.

Regards

I would also like to meet him.

I want to discuss the following topics with him:

1) Out Of India theory of Aryan migration

2) All Indians belong to the same race

3) Hinduism is Indian in origin

4) Pakistanis are the true civilizational and racial inheritors of the IVC

5) India or the Indian civilization was a military tour de force of the ancient and medieval world and just their lack of unity and infighting caused them to be invaded and conquered by every other militaristic race in the old and new world

Regards, and kudos.

 

[SoulSpokesman]

Adil bhai,

Of all the folks here, he would be the best person to throw light on abovementioned topics.

Regards