What's new

An extremist Hindu leader rises in India, along with hopes for a controversial temple - latimes

What Indian muslims think about Jinnah and Kashmir seperatists


I'll be glad to see him under the hinduvta knife

Now I am getting a negative rating but the post where the "liberal" abuses Hinduism seems alright.
Well done :D

this is a PAKISTANI forum and we despise you people, so you can GTFO if you don't like it
 
Now I am getting a negative rating but the post where the "liberal" abuses Hinduism seems alright.
Well done :D

Congratulations on your first negative rating.

Consider it a badge of honor. Wear it with pride.
 
with all due respect, He integrated himself with swine eating people in Britain and so did Nehru being stylish with beef eating people in Britain, who do zina openly and then you claim such contradictory thing when the people of subconti were culturally still similar. You just needed a common law. Nothing else.

I am not talking about Jinnah personally. He recognized that the Muslims by and large had not integrated with Hindus in 1400 years.

They continued to exist in India as a separate entity for all practical matters. Which is why the muslims voted for him in such large numbers (90% of the population). They knew what he was talking about. It was only the Hindus who were in deinal.

He just rode that wave to the top like any good ambitious politician.
 
I am not talking about Jinnah personally. He recognized that the Muslims by and large had not integrated with Hindus in 1400 years.

They continued to exist in India as a separate entity for all practical matters. Which is why the muslims voted for him in such large numbers (90% of the population). They knew what he was talking about. It was only the Hindus who were in deinal.

He just rode that wave to the top like any good ambitious politician.

Muslims in South Asia were not a homogenous entity, wtf do you mean by " not integrating with Hindus"? In some regions they were actually in the majority, so if anything the intergration should've been the other way around
 
He recognized that the Muslims by and large had not integrated with Hindus in 1400 years.

he was one of the main player in keep british interest , that's why he recognized something which is taught to him in the Kingdom of Britain.
 
Cow

Love jihad

Ghar waapsi

Romeo squads

Beef ban

Beef lynchings

Gau rakshak goon squads

Godmen pushing snake oil

Alternative history reengineering

Textbook saffronization

Monkeys in office

Mandir politics

RIP development

RIP economy

RIP plurality

RIP India
The biggest curse on us is Sickularism.... Need to do away with this myth forever, mend your ways to acclimatise in the changing political fabric....
Till Sickularism was outshining everything you too were very okay with that despite dismissal performance on many parameters including that you raised, but the moment monopoly of Sickularism ended you trying to throw another victimhood mentality here n there....
 
he was one of the main player in keep british interest , that's why he recognized something which is taught to him in the Kingdom of Britain.
wut

The biggest curse on us is Sickularism.... Need to do away with this myth forever, mend your ways to acclimatise in the changing political fabric....
Till Sickularism was outshining everything you too were very okay with that despite dismissal performance on many parameters including that you raised, but the moment monopoly of Sickularism ended you trying to throw another victimhood mentality here n there....
*Sikhularism
 
Muslims in South Asia were not a homogenous entity, wtf do you mean by " not integrating with Hindus"? In some regions they were actually in the majority, so if anything the intergration should've been the other way around

In Islam, the five pillars need to be followed. Rest is NOT compulsory, the problem rose, when Muslims intentionally started eating beef just to show Hindus that they don't care of their beliefs. Otherwise, Islam does not say that you have to provoke some other community. Compromise is valued in Islam, by the way not eating beef is not a compromise related to Islam, but your own self.

You are not spreading Islam by eating beef in front of hindus, you are just ridiculing it more.
 
In Islam, the five pillars need to be followed. Rest is NOT compulsory, the problem rose, when Muslims intentionally started eating beef just to show Hindus that they don't care of their beliefs. Otherwise, Islam does not say that you have to provoke some other community. Compromise is valued in Islam, by the way not eating beef is not a compromise related to Islam, but your own self.

You are not spreading Islam by eating beef in front of hindus, you are just ridiculing it more.

My Vedic bros ate beef tho :(
 
My Vedic bros ate beef tho :(

Cow was not a meal and it's strict for us, it's written in Bhagwat Geeta. And Again you are ridiculing Islam by preaching me that I need to learn my lessons on beef but you will not stop eating beef in front of me. This is the point I am making. You need to introspect.
 
Cow was not a meal and it's strict for us, it's written in Bhagwat Geeta. And Again you are ridiculing Islam by preaching me that I need to learn my lessons on beef but you will not stop eating beef in front of me. This is the point I am making. You need to introspect.

you got a beef with me?
 
The biggest curse on us is Sickularism.... Need to do away with this myth forever, mend your ways to acclimatise in the changing political fabric....
Till Sickularism was outshining everything you too were very okay with that despite dismissal performance on many parameters including that you raised, but the moment monopoly of Sickularism ended you trying to throw another victimhood mentality here n there....

Being secular is India's biggest strength.

What forged a continent into a nation.

Break that and you will see India break within our lifetimes.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom