Rohingya!

[idune]

Even that heartless bitch Hasina had to bow to BD people power and not only allow the Rohingya in but also promise them all necessary shelter, food and medical assistance.

That bitch has not bowed but deceiving with act. Just yesterday bitch blocked 22 trucks of relief materials, just because it was from political party BNP. MOST IMPORTANTLY, that bitch prevented all actions to safeguard Bangladesh sovereignty and integrity as a "state".

 

[UKBengali]

He is looking for burnol and india looking isolated in its support for Myanmar regime committing genocide.

Well butcher of Muslims in Gujarat sharing a drink with the butcher of Muslims in Rakhine(Arakan).

Not exactly surprising.

 

[Nilgiri]

@Nilgiri

What happened to China and Russia blocking such statements?

You are a delusional moron.

Diplomatic victory for Bangladesh, they got all the P5 members on board.

Already addressed:

this is water down version, calling for humanitarian action, got passed. Earlier version that identified by Myanmar violating rights and responsible for mass killing was vetoed by China and Russia. Myanmar junta gives rat$ a$$ to UN and continuing its genocidal act. Only language of power and occupation are understood by Myanmar.

Just look at this statement:

The council condemned the violence and called for humanitarian aid workers to be able to reach those in need in Rakhine state.

.....um ok? Myanmar agrees with that. Myanmar hates the ARSA-induced violence too and yes humanitarian workers should be allowed to reach them when possible and situation stabilises for it.

Basically each side can continue to point to other side as the "violent" one (does UNSC assign any ownership of it?) and that humanitarian workers ought to reach there (fully subservient to MM sovereignty).

UNSC already knows clearly China and Russia will veto anything that labels Myanmar as any one-sided perpetrator requiring any kind of sanction. This was probably exactly what was discussed before this vote, so that there is a statement everyone can agree upon (including MM - who's case represented by China and Russia). Hence watered down waffle that has no bearable action on MM, which will now continue at its pace while heeding this statement under whatever interpretation.....because a) its not called out as the sole perpetrator and b) no specific sanctions or even censure of MM as an actor in this....but just generalised "violence"...needing "humanitarian" response asap.

True but at least it lays responsibility for the excessive force and by implication killings squarely on Myanmar.

It doesn't.

UN Secretary General also bluntly called this ethnic cleansing.

Also didn't label/assign Myanmar state/army as exclusive perpetrator. His words matter zero too unless UNSC brings sanctions or assigns peacekeepers etc...esp on basis of Myanmar being labelled as such. None of which happened....and none of it will happen.

1 million Rohingya moved to BD, end of story. Will there be more to come? let's see.

 

[UKBengali]

Already addressed:



Just look at this statement:

The council condemned the violence and called for humanitarian aid workers to be able to reach those in need in Rakhine state.

.....um ok? Myanmar agrees with that. Myanmar hates the ARSA-induced violence too and yes humanitarian workers should be allowed to reach them when possible and situation stabilises for it.

Basically each side can continue to point to other side as the "violent" one (does UNSC assign any ownership of it?) and that humanitarian workers ought to reach there (fully subservient to MM sovereignty).

UNSC already knows clearly China and Russia will veto anything that labels Myanmar as any one-sided perpetrator requiring any kind of sanction. This was probably exactly what was discussed before this vote, so that there is a statement everyone can agree upon (including MM - who's case represented by China and Russia). Hence watered down waffle that has no bearable action on MM, which will now continue at its pace while heeding this statement under whatever interpretation.....because a) its not called out as the sole perpetrator and b) no specific sanctions or even censure of MM as an actor in this....but just generalised "violence"...needing "humanitarian" response asap.

"excessive force used by Myanmar during its security operation in Rakhine state and called for "immediate steps" to end the violence"


Do you not understand simple English?

It says "Excessive Force used by Myanmar" and calls for an immediate cessation of this.

 

[Goenitz]

idk its china move (to malign india) or self awakening that she stood for rohingya muslims... yes, China should go against the 't separatists group.. however, Indian govt is badly exposed that they didn't allow refugees... the hindu rohingya and muslims both were victims, but 'cradle of civilization' and 'biggest democracy' who always says that they sheltered zooristani or jews and others etc etc failed to refuge homeless people...

 

[BDforever]

Already addressed:



Just look at this statement:

The council condemned the violence and called for humanitarian aid workers to be able to reach those in need in Rakhine state.

.....um ok? Myanmar agrees with that. Myanmar hates the ARSA-induced violence too and yes humanitarian workers should be allowed to reach them when possible and situation stabilises for it.

Basically each side can continue to point to other side as the "violent" one (does UNSC assign any ownership of it?) and that humanitarian workers ought to reach there (fully subservient to MM sovereignty).

UNSC already knows clearly China and Russia will veto anything that labels Myanmar as any one-sided perpetrator requiring any kind of sanction. This was probably exactly what was discussed before this vote, so that there is a statement everyone can agree upon (including MM - who's case represented by China and Russia). Hence watered down waffle that has no bearable action on MM, which will now continue at its pace while heeding this statement under whatever interpretation.....because a) its not called out as the sole perpetrator and b) no specific sanctions or even censure of MM as an actor in this....but just generalised "violence"...needing "humanitarian" response asap.



It doesn't.



Also didn't label/assign Myanmar state/army as exclusive perpetrator. His words matter zero too unless UNSC brings sanctions or assigns peacekeepers etc...esp on basis of Myanmar being labelled as such. None of which happened....and none of it will happen.

1 million Rohingya moved to BD, end of story. Will there be more to come? let's see.

 

[idune]

Already addressed:

Just look at this statement:

The council condemned the violence and called for humanitarian aid workers to be able to reach those in need in Rakhine state.

.....um ok? Myanmar agrees with that. Myanmar hates the ARSA-induced violence too and yes humanitarian workers should be allowed to reach them when possible and situation stabilises for it.

Basically each side can continue to point to other side as the "violent" one (does UNSC assign any ownership of it?) and that humanitarian workers ought to reach there (fully subservient to MM sovereignty).

UNSC already knows clearly China and Russia will veto anything that labels Myanmar as any one-sided perpetrator requiring any kind of sanction. This was probably exactly what was discussed before this vote, so that there is a statement everyone can agree upon (including MM - who's case represented by China and Russia). Hence watered down waffle that has no bearable action on MM, which will now continue at its pace while heeding this statement under whatever interpretation.....because a) its not called out as the sole perpetrator and b) no specific sanctions or even censure of MM as an actor in this....but just generalised "violence"...needing "humanitarian" response asap.

an indian turd, like yourself, can not play smart Alec; indians often forget about their place. Now, you in typical indian style, are farting as if you are Myanmar junta spokesperson and UNSC insiders at the same time. Looks like burnol you applied got rash reaction, you speaking utter rubbish.

 

[UKBengali]

Also didn't label/assign Myanmar state/army as exclusive perpetrator. His words matter zero too unless UNSC brings sanctions or assigns peacekeepers etc...esp on basis of Myanmar being labelled as such. None of which happened....and none of it will happen.

1 million Rohingya moved to BD, end of story. Will there be more to come? let's see.

Why are you emabarrassing yourself here?

Myanmar is clearly been labelled by UN chief as responsible for ethnic cleansing.

Now India is completely isolated and Modi has shown his diplomatic immaturity by shaking hands with the Myanmar killers. Then again he himself is known as the "Butcher of Gujarat".

 

[Rollno21]

Well butcher of Muslims in Gujarat sharing a drink with the butcher of Muslims in Rakhine(Arakan).

Not exactly surprising.

Butchers of Muslims .
But somehow Muslims is non Muslim states seem to multiplying and at the same time non Muslims in Muslim states are decreasing or none left.

 

[Nilgiri]

All UN security council members voted against Myanmar govt. action and asked to stop violance. Looks like we have won diplomatic battle

UNSC did not "ask/order" myanmar (esp as a state) to "stop" anything....in contrast to say what Sudan did in Darfur (Sudan labelled both as a country/state actor in that by UNSC, sanctions bought to bear and war crimes court put a warrant for their leader's arrest).

It (UNSC) just condemned the violence and asked for humanitarian workers (not even peacekeepers or anything that would question MM sovereignty) to return to area to help with situation....the most basic watered down thing that MM was saying anyway from its specific interpretation. All done just so UNSC can pass something no matter how small and insignificant it is to actual implementation. It would be impossible for any country to not call for what UNSC called for with this kind of generalised, open language.

But maybe BD will take whatever it can get at this point (optically,verbally) no matter how small, given the realised reality that will continue to be enforced on you on the ground (that was,is and will be a big win for MM). We see it across the board regarding anything related to BD (dissonance of optics with realised reality).

 

[UKBengali]

Butchers of Muslims .
But somehow Muslims is non Muslim states seem to multiplying and at the same time non Muslims in Muslim states are decreasing or none left.

When all countries in the world like US/EU/Russia/China and Muslim countries are united in condeming Myanmar, your Prime Minister goes to Myanmar and shakes hand with the leader of a country that was engaged in mass killings, rape and ethnic cleansing!

What a turd he looks now.

 

[Rollno21]

When all countries in the world like US/EU/Russia/China and Muslim countries are united in condeming Myanmar, your Prime Minister goes to Myanmar and shakes hand with the leader of a country that was engaged in mass killings, rape and ethnic cleansing!

What a turd he looks now.

Why do you pretend,you know nothing has changed on the ground,all it has been said is every one wants the voilence to stop and if you ask the Myanmar army they too will say the same thing .what is needed on the ground is Muslims countries come forward with something to help the refugees on the ground and I don't mean arming them,I mean like resetting them or something and not to expect others to do the dirty job

 

[BDforever]

UNSC did not "ask/order" myanmar (esp as a state) to "stop" anything....in contrast to say what Sudan did in Darfur (Sudan labelled both as a country/state actor in that by UNSC, sanctions bought to bear and war crimes court put a warrant for their leader's arrest).

It (UNSC) just condemned the violence and asked for humanitarian workers (not even peacekeepers or anything that would question MM sovereignty) to return to area to help with situation....the most basic watered down thing that MM was saying anyway from its specific interpretation. All done just so UNSC can pass something no matter how small and insignificant it is to actual implementation. It would be impossible for any country to not call for what UNSC called for with this kind of generalised, open language.

But maybe BD will take whatever it can get at this point (optically,verbally) no matter how small, given the realised reality that will continue to be enforced on you on the ground (that was,is and will be a big win for MM). We see it across the board regarding anything related to BD (dissonance of optics with realised reality).

 

[idune]

UNSC did not "ask/order" myanmar (esp as a state) to "stop" anything...

It (UNSC) just condemned the violence and asked for humanitarian workers (not even peacekeepers or anything that would question MM sovereignty) to return to area to help with situation.....

so indian turd like yourself and india is setting the bar what would be a defeat for Myanmar genocidal regime? If that is so, isn't that duplicity double act by india which also supporting Myanmar genocidal act?

 

[Nilgiri]

Why are you emabarrassing yourself here?

Myanmar is clearly been labelled by UN chief as responsible for ethnic cleansing.

Now India is completely isolated and Modi has shown his diplomatic immaturity by shaking hands with the Myanmar killers. Then again he himself is known as the "Butcher of Gujarat".

UN-chief can say whatever he wants....its optics consumption only, not reality/implementation-driven (where UNSC comes in). UNSC provides the implementation and what's been shown in the end is the huge dissonance between UN-chiefs words and what UNSC actually says as far as reality on this issue.

Kofi Annan and Ban Ki-Moon did such multiple times worldwide as well (in effect thats what a sec general does)....in the end effective power (even as far as the limited one UN has) lies with UNSC solely. They just gave middle finger to BD and big helping hand to MM to continue as it pleases by interpreting this lax statement as it sees fit (no sanctions, no binding orders/censure, not even hint of any enforcement).

Don't need to go by what I say here, just watch the ground reality.

I was sort of expecting a much harder push this time by the 3 western p5 to get something bigger in the statement like last time....but looks like they chickened out or just dont care enough....so they went with the China + Russia (i.e MM supporters) position on it, just to get unanimous vote rather than any vetos (which would be even worse for UN sec general, media and so on).