Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Slav Defence and @waz
Please read:
Post no 9
"The issue, i suppose, that the Americans are claiming is that the build up will lead up to regional insular military buildup. B that as it may, seems like that is exactly what is happening. Powder keg. So the Yanks have a point, i suppose.
Source: US actions prompt islands militarization "
Post no 29
"About time China took a stance. Someone needs to teach the self righteous Yanks about what's in CISA & Patriot Act and Indian's need not get their panties in a twist either, does TADA/POTA ring a bell?
Source: https://defence.pk/threads/china-criticizes-us-double-standards-on-terrorism.414890/page-2#ixzz3vZRseh3P "
A "-ve rating" on my post # 9145
South China Sea News & Discussions | Page 610
Your review of the above @# post 9145 is appreciated
Why not remove the "ratings" option for those that abuse it?I'm going to speak to him about that and warn him.
I will however say that negative ratings for insulting terms are fully justified.
Why not remove the "ratings" option for those that abuse it?
I have received negative ratings from only two abusers: Wholegrain and the Mexican-Viet.
When you (the moderators) keep receiving persistent complaints from long-time PDF members, why not remove the ratings button from the Mexican-Viet?
I haven't seen Wholegrain in years, so he's not a problem anymore.
Do away with everything. How is a personal insult a 'useful' post ? This happens often enough when someone cast a personal insult at someone else, does not have to be profane or even crass, and others profusely 'Thank' or 'Like' the post. If someone make a comment that is illuminating to the subject under discussion, its benefits for others will be self evident. Any kind of rating is nothing but for the ego of the poster.The ratings system is currently being reviewed. But this thread does give people who have received a negative rating a chance to have their say, and have it either removed or explained why it still stands.
I'm going to speak to him about that and warn him.
I will however say that negative ratings for insulting terms are fully justified.
Why not remove the "ratings" option for those that abuse it?
I have received negative ratings from only two abusers: Wholegrain and the Mexican-Viet.
When you (the moderators) keep receiving persistent complaints from long-time PDF members, why not remove the ratings button from the Mexican-Viet?
I haven't seen Wholegrain in years, so he's not a problem anymore.
When one PDF member complains, that's one thing.
You've had complaints from three PDF members that have been here for years.
Me, Sanchez, and Keel against the Mexican-Viet.
How many more long-time PDF members have to complain before you acknowledge the Mexican-Viet is abusing his privilege?
The ratings system is currently being reviewed. But this thread does give people who have received a negative rating a chance to have their say, and have it either removed or explained why it still stands.
Thank you for replying
"him" I think you are referring to the "unqualified" giver of "-ve" ratings and he deserves a penalty much heavier than "warning"
If you think the rating is "justified", then please give the same to the 2 posters mentioned at post 463 and all of them here which runs up to 10 pages:
Search Results for Query: yanks
I concur with Martian2
jhungary himself is the worst abuser and he constantly uses personal and grandscale insults, most of which through -ve ratings directing at the Chinese community
Here some very bizarre examples :
In this thread:
View attachment 283208
which then ran into the crazy abuses and attacks:
View attachment 283209
View attachment 283210