What's new

Remembering Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

Gandhiji is on trial by people who have no idea of how hard is it to launch a independence movement, whatever the outcome is , at least Indians are free and not slaves of Britishers. Not slaves of govt. too as one member will definitely point out.

Great minds of 20th century admired Gandhi and his principles. He orchestrated the freedom movement. If something wrong happened why blame him only.

Its like when India looses even after Sachin makes a century, people call Sachin is not a match winner. So no responsibility of rest ten players. they are Free "Ten"dulkars.

That guy risked his life and got assassinated for his cause. How many of you guys are ready to do that. Living in your cozy rooms, passing judgment on a person who united India with other great leaders.

Don't put entire blame on Gandhiji if you can't stop yourself to blame someone.

Do the psycho-analysis and read more about study on his psychology and POV.


Mate - please do not pull this soft blasphemous crap on folks who have contrasting opinion about Gandhi. This is not a land of Stalin or Mao. This is a land where even gods' actions(especially in Mahabaratha and Ramayana) are critiqued. Gandhi is a public figure and as long as his private life is not touched upon, it is ok to assess him for his actions. And if someone is carrying the honorofic "Mahatma", the scrutiny will be twice intense. And you do not need a specialist doing psycho-analytic mumbo-jumbo to study him. Anyone with basic cognitive skills backed by facts can do it.
 
Well said. But was it just the Malabar massacre ? The Noakhali violence, Partition violence..many come to mind.

"If Lahore is dying...die with it"..His words to the Hindus and Sikhs who were fleeing from the ciolence and killings in Lahore.

Gandhi was a Mahatma till Independence came. But after that sadly his actions did not gel with the national interests. The only thing he knew was agitation. Not administration.


And similar stuff what Gandhi uttered for Noakhali -



QUIT NOAKHALI OR DIE, GANDHI WARNS HINDUS NEW DELHI. India, April 7 (AP)-Mohandas K. Gandhi, who has been attempting to Insure communal peace in the Bengal and Bihar areas, said today religious strike in the troubled Noakhali section of Bengal seemed to call for Hindus to leave or perish "In the flames of fanaticism." Meanwhile, a one day strike of workers throughout Bombay Province appeared likely to be called by the Provincial Trade Union Congress to express sympathy with the two week old strike of 8,500 transport workers In the city of Bombay. Mr. Gandhi hailed his walking tour of Bengal and Bihar at the Invitation of the new Viceroy. Viscount Mountbatten. for discussions: on departure of the British from. India, by June, 1945. Today he released telegrams from Congress party workers in Noakhali. which Is predominately Moslem, in which they described attempts to burn Hindus alive.

New York Times,April 8, 1947



Agreed Gandhi and Nehru should have been banished for retirement once independence was achieved just like what British people did to Churchill post WWII as they saw him fit for running the government only during war time.
 
An alternative viewpoint :-

The Leftists had no use for Mahatma Gandhi during his life time. They had hurled their choicest swear-words at him. But the Mahatma dead seems to have become an asset for them. Not that they have revised their estimate of his role in the past or acquired any respect for him in the present. They are only using him as a stick to beat Hindu society into shame.

Muslims, too, have staged a similar volte face. They had opposed him tooth and nail during his life-time. The language which their press had used for him provides a study in pornography. But after his death they have been holding him up in order to harangue Hindu society. Not that they hve changed their opinion about him or imbibed any of his teachings. They are only using him as a device to put Hindu society on the defensive.

The Gandhians present a very curious case. They claim to have inherited the message of the Mahatma. But the only people with whom they feel at home are Hindu-baiters. They avoid all those who are not ashamed of being Hindus or who take pride in Hindu history and heritage. They suspect that "Hindu communalism" has been and remains India's major malady. The only point to which they never refer is that Mahatma Gandhi was a proud Hindu with a profound faith in sanatana Dharma and that a reawakening and rejuvenation of Hindu society was his most important preoccupation.

The Hindu-baiters highlight the fact that the Mahatma was murdered by a Hindu. But they hide the fact that it was the Hindus who had always rallied round Mahatma Gandhi, who had adored him throughout his life, who had followed him as their leader and who had stood by him through thick and thin. It is tantamount to insinuating that Hindus have done nothing in the whole of their history except murdering the Mahatma. The only parallel is provided by the Catholic Church which has known the Jews only as murderers of Jesus.

The anti-Gandhi nationalists have never tried honestly to face the fact that it was he and not they who had stirred the minds and hearts of Hindu masses. It was he and not they who had mobilized Hindu society to make sacrifices in the service of the motherland. Nor have the denunciations of anti-Gandhi nationalists succeeded in doing the slightest damage to his stature. In fact, his stature has risen higher with the passing of time. He continues to be cherished by Hindu masses as one of the greatest in their history. Reverence for him in the world at large has also continued to grow. He is now regarded as a profound thinker on problems created by an industrial civilisation and a hedonistic culture. Hinduism has gained abroad because Gandhi is known as a great Hindu.

On the other hand it must be admitted that the failure which the Mahatma met vis-a-vis the Muslims was truly of startling proportions. Hindu-Muslim unity was a goal which he had pursued with great dedication throughout his life. He had paid high tributes to Islam, its prophet its caliphs and its scriptures. He had espoused the cause of Khalifat in order to win Muslim hearts. He had befriended even questionable characters like Mohammad Ali because the latter enjoyed the confidence of Muslim masses. He had gone out of his way to humour Jinnah who was always cold and quite often nasty in his manners. He had ignored the invectives that were hurled at him by the Muslim press and politicians. He had even advised the British to hand over power to Muslims and quit. he had always frowned at all efforts to organise Hindus in order to call the Muslim bluff. In short, his policy towards Muslims had been full of appeasement at the cost of Hindu society. But nothing had helped. Muslims had continued to grow more and more hostile.

If we put these two facts together, we can perhaps draw some worthwhile conclusions. First, it follows that Hindu society responds only to a call which is deeply religious and cultural. Anti-Gandhi nationalists have failed to move Hindu masses because their appeal has been purely political. These nationalists have drawn most of their inspiration from the modern West and not from India's own great past. Secondly, there must be something very hard in the heart of Islam so that even a man of an oceanic goodwill like Mahatma Gandhi failed to move it. He succeeded with the British by making them feel morally in the wrong. He succeeded with such sections of Hindu society as had nourished some grievances of their own and had tried to turn away from the freedom movement. It was only the Muslims with whom he failed miserably.

Perversion Of India's Political Parlance - Chapter 7 - The Place of Mahatma Gandhi

Mate - please do not pull this soft blasphemous crap on folks who have contrasting opinion about Gandhi.

+1. .
 
look who is saying. world's most forward country. which getting ..... on daily basis.

5000 children die everyday in India due to poverty. Thats more than all IMR's in Africa combined. Be ashamed, son.
 
5000 children die everyday in India due to poverty. Thats more than all IMR's in Africa combined. Be ashamed, son.

grand pa. you should mind your own business..... poverty is an banned topic...... Indian population is more than African continent. Here population is important factor....
 
Its ironical that a country that got freedom through non-violence is now home to the 4th largest armed forces in the world with a defence budget in the tune of billions.
 
5000 children die everyday in India due to poverty. Thats more than all IMR's in Africa combined. Be ashamed, son.

2400 Pakistani kids die everyday die. That's like a third of our absolute death rate of children, even though your population is one tenth of ours. Which means Pakistani kids are worse of than Indian kids. :enjoy:
 
Back
Top Bottom