1. "Socialism" surely was a description that Muammar used for the time till Libyans got completely used to the idea of easy life in a leftist system and then he would use "Communism". As I said earlier, one of the desires of Communism is true democracy i.e. participatory democracy i.e. people governing themselves by self participation and that was what Libya's political system was.
2. What is abolition of money if not Communist ?
3. Muammar had written an essay titled something like "Has Communism arrived yet ?" and he in fact had criticized Libyans in general for being receptive to non-progressive thought and wondered when they will progress in thought.
So, Libya's social system and socio-economic system was Socialist, and political system was Communist even if many Libyans didn't call it by that name.
How do you know that ? Don't you read of some recent North Koreans who ran away from North Korea to the South saying that their life is a struggle where in the North many necessities of life were easily obtainable but in the South they had to struggle ?
Widely known ? Where and among whom ? Did the Afghan cosmonaut Abdul Ahad Momand, the second South Asian in space, and his colleagues know it by that description ?
Simple question : Why wasn't this "Non-combat medical support unit" on the North Korean side but was in the Western Bloc side ?
My request to you : Give your loyalty to the innocent humans of your country - whether Arveena Khatoon or the farmers who protested all over the county in 2020-21 - and don't give mindless devotion to the State. Attain the intellect of Bhagat Singh and Ambedkar and not of Tejasvi Surya.
What would Bhagat and Ambedkar have made of the situation of now ?
