The difference between terrorists and freedom fighters is not that difficult actually
That's my point too. The difference is easily understood by the rest of the world, only Pakistanis have trouble understanding it. Remember, you are the one who brought the term 'terrorists' into this thread. It is you who have a confusion.
The definition is simple- people who uses violence to achieve political aim
Umm..no. That would make every army, navy and air force, every single combatant a terrorist. Was the Pak army terrrorists, when they started operation gibraltar in 1965?
Those who deliberately inflict violence on civilians, non combatants - that' whom we call terrorists. Those who attempt political aims by terrorization of the civilian population. That is why the firebombing of cities in the world wars wass called 'terror bombing'. That is also why your lashkies and mujjus are terrorists, but organized fighting forces like Mukti Bahini that wage war against standing armies like the PA are freedom fighters.
Either the Bangladesh cause was political or the kashmiri cause is- or both- or not-you just can not just endorse one as freedim fighters while others as terrorists-
For the gazzillionth time - it is not the cause that makes the difference, it is the means. If your army tries to fight the Indian army to take the Kashmir that you want, it is war, not terrorism. But your sending non uniformed lashkies and mujjus to cause bomb blasts or shoot innocent people or do things like chittisinghpura massacre - that's terrorism.
Only purelanders have a hard time understanding this.
When you have to arrest political kashmiri leaders
Only Kashmiri
separatist leaders get arrested on sensitive occasions as precautionary measure, and get released in a few days. The legitimate leaders are elected by Kashmiris and work inside the legislative assembly or parliament on their behalf. The separatists are lucky to be Indians - in most other countries, seditious people get a bullet in their heads, not govt accommodation and food. Didn't Bugti get a missile instead of a jail term? How many Indian Kashmiri separatists have gotten that treatment?
It's preposterous for you to lecture us on such matters, when you cannot aspire to match our moral standing in a million years.
You blatantly supported terrorism inside Pakistan during 71 where you should have minded your own business- and now cry foul when same is done to you
We supported a freedom movement, and our proteges founded a new country, and the native population cheered and garlanded our army colums when we moved in, and treated us like the liberating heroes we were. On the other hand, your terrorists are just that - terrorists who do random acts of violence, and accomplish nothing. As for crying - we don't cry and surrender en masse like the mard-e-momins did in B'desh - we kill every infiltrating terrorist, and frustrate Pakistan's knavish tricks, and keep our most troubled state more peaceful than any part of the pureland.
As per your condition kashmiri people are trained by ISI and will soon become a formidable fighting force
Comprehension issues? Yes, they are trained and armed by the ISI, but my point is that they will not become formidable fighting forces, like the organized battalions of MBs became. That's the difference between the genius of RAW, and the impotence of "the world's best intel agency" that can't even sniff out terrorists within their own country.
Your proteges will remain terrorists doing mindless and random acts of terror. They will never become nation builders, they will never be organized into proper large sized figting units with proper command and control, they will never take an inch of Kashmir from India.
You tried that tactic of non uniformed terrorists after your army lost the will to openly take on India in honourable warfare.And even then you failed, they cannot get Kashmir either.