Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hi,
again,i would like to remind that NOT ALL NITs are equal(only NIT trichy and warangal are the top ones) similarly NOT ALL IITs are equal in terms of calibre of students and placements.
now you'd naturally ask,how come all NITs are not equal? well the part of the answer lies in the cut off ranks of students taking various NITs,for instance majority of top 1000 AIR scorers in AIEEE go for trichy without a single thought,similarly top 1000 AIR in JEE choose IIT bombay without a spec of doubt!
Since i am myself a product of NIT trichy ,btech in instrumentation and control engineering,i think i can shed some light on the placement trends of my college-
Firstly yes,i agree,a lot of the graduates do end up working for fat salaries in companies like city corp,goldman sachs and credit suisse from my college- infact from my batch city corp took 7 however they hired 19 grads from my juniors batch! Now,naturally second question that comes to mind is how would you quatify that "lot"?what is the percentage of students opting for business streams,data analytics,etc, to your surprise this figure isnt even 40%! In circuital branches of my college this "percentage" is even lesser!
Secondly a "lot" of students also get hired in R&D firms like texas instruments,qualcom,broadcom and national instruments(for circuital branches)- their percentage although lesser than the number of students getting into business stream is still a "decent" number.
I am really not sure,what NITs did you actually go to to form that stunted erroneous perspective- I would strongly urge you to contact head of T&P Mr bhaktavathsalam for further clarifications!
@Donatello
Care to explain the "other" benchmarks of "innovation".I would love to hear you out
@Donatello
I am afraid you are mixing two different terms- research and innovations- to innovate new things you dont "necessarily" need a highly complex lab worth millions of dollars! research on the other hand requires millions of dollars
He was from IIT-Bombay, did his undergrad from there and then did his Masters....i believe he said it was 2 years Masters course and he studied Signals and Comm since his PhD research was based on that......he didn't want to study in India for a PhD since he said the research is almost non-existent...so he chose to apply to the UK University, and got a full ride scholarship with support funding for his wife as well.
hi,
again,i would like to remind that NOT ALL NITs are equal(only NIT trichy and warangal are the top ones) similarly NOT ALL IITs are equal in terms of calibre of students and placements.
now you'd naturally ask,how come all NITs are not equal? well the part of the answer lies in the cut off ranks of students taking various NITs,for instance majority of top 1000 AIR scorers in AIEEE go for trichy without a single thought,similarly top 1000 AIR in JEE choose IIT bombay without a spec of doubt!
Since i am myself a product of NIT trichy ,btech in instrumentation and control engineering,i think i can shed some light on the placement trends of my college-
Firstly yes,i agree,a lot of the graduates do end up working for fat salaries in companies like city corp,goldman sachs and credit suisse from my college- infact from my batch city corp took 7 however they hired 19 grads from my juniors batch! Now,naturally second question that comes to mind is how would you quatify that "lot"?what is the percentage of students opting for business streams,data analytics,etc, to your surprise this figure isnt even 40%! In circuital branches of my college this "percentage" is even lesser!
Secondly a "lot" of students also get hired in R&D firms like texas instruments,qualcom,broadcom and national instruments(for circuital branches)- their percentage although lesser than the number of students getting into business stream is still a "decent" number.
I am really not sure,what NITs did you actually go to to form that stunted erroneous perspective- I would strongly urge you to contact head of T&P Mr bhaktavathsalam for further clarifications!
Normally to get ECE(electronics and com) in IIT B you need to get an AIR of below 100- which means you need to be exceptionally brilliant! and when i say exceptionally brilliant i mean it- i dont think you have seen someone with an AIR of below 500- blieve me you would never form such an opinion and judging by your description i think it is highly likely that he'd be a mtech from IIT B and not a Btech.Believe me, it is FAR EASIER to get an admission into harvard ,princeton,cornell,AMU than getting into top 5 IITs! getting a GRE score of 330 is pretty easy than getting a top rank in either JEE or GATE. The highest and lowest GRE score from my batch were 334 and 320 respectively
having more patents does not mean you will have more jobs created and more economic activity generated. 10 patents each worth 1 million are better than 100 patents each worth 10,000....i hope you understand the mathematics there.....so i guess you would choose 100 patents? because 100 is a bigger number than 10? More is better?
In case you're interested, google TEQIP (the project I'm referring to, currently about to begin it's 3rd phase)
Are you from NIT or IIT?
Advanced Hornets!
![]()
![]()
I always liked this aircraft ....... simple looking and beautifull ..... as an add-on carrier capable as well .
Second best choice of mine.
You didn't know what goodie's we add in our block 2 and it is now almost same as f-16 blk 52.
You didn't know what goodie's we add in our block 2 and it is now almost same as f-16 blk 52.
no change in engine or radar.still inferior.
no change in engine or radar.still inferior.
Which is still inferior to any other fighter in Indian air force other than Mig 21.
Thaat's a lot of trouble over a plane that is at best as good as an F-15C of the early 80s in Air-Air. But it hits Air-Ground target almost as good as an F-15E but not as good.
I beg to disagree with this statement.
F-15 is no doubt an excellent aircraft that has never been shot down despite having more than 100 air to air kills. However, one must not ignore that most of the kills were against less capable adversaries. For example Israeli F-15s against Syrian Migs, US against Iraqi Air force. Understand Saudi F-15’s have also shot down 2 Iranian Phantoms. Again Phantom is no match for F-15 in any field. In its F-15E version it can carry 24,000 lbs of ordinance which no doubt makes it a truly great fighter bomber.
In 2004 exercise “Cope India” Su 30 MK1s & Mig -29s achieved kills against F-15C albeit that UASF had agreed not to use BVR missiles. This shows that in a classic air to air combat, without the use of advanced BVR missile, F-15C is certainly not superior to Mk1 or Mig-29 in the hands of an experienced pilot.
Remember we are talking one versus one under equitable conditions. Royal Saudi Air force flies F-15’s and your claim that Rafael is at best as good as F-15C but not as good as F-15E is only valid when looked through the eyes of a patriot.
Perhaps in its F-15SE guise, because of its stealth features it is probably superior to Typhon & Raphael. My reasoning is based upon the fact that F-15 airframe is essentially a 1970’s aircraft design. Avionics & weapon systems of F-15E are of equal capability as that of Typhoon or Raphael. However, no matter how many modifications you do to a 40 year old design, it simply cannot compete with 21st century technology fighters such as Typhoon and Rafael.