If supreme court only thinks that its court which can run the dam country, they r wrong, which they think they r right now!
agree but they are only trying to regain their lost power conferred to them by the constitution.
Anything which can show their power they kept taking by sumo-moto anything which is not in their intersts they don't care?
That is your opinion so what can I say
They can tell a C-minster of baluchistan that ur govt is finished & you may go now, they can adive to take FC out of bluchistan?
Wow ,
They haven't said that the government is finished. Only thing they have said so far is the government's principle job is to protect the civil rights of it's people and the Balochistan government has failed to do that so far, so at what authority are they running the government if they cannot protect it's people. There has been 71 hearing by the Supreme Court on Balochistan case and there were hardly any representation by the provincial government, they didn't take the SC very seriously so the SC had to question them about the authority that is allowing them to run the government?
They can advise to send rangers back to borders & give thiesalries to police which is highly politisized in karachi !
Wow
But they have also highlighted various other issues inter-linked with Karachi killings. They were not in opinion of keeping the FC in Karachi because the FC was sent in Karachi in 1995 and after 17 years, the circumstances in Karachi has only worsen. So the SC is asking the logic of keeping FC in the cities for so long where the prime job to handle such cases is of police. There were riots in London couple of months ago but they didn't bring the army in London, they let the police handle with that situation and if they are not able to do it, they need more officers or trained staff... that does not mean you bring the FC to handle such situations where the nature of their training is different to police training.
They also highlighted that about 40% of the police recruitments were done on political basis and that the police should be empowered to take independent decisions, they are the ones who highlighted about 3500 criminals roaming around the streets of Karachi, they are the ones who highlighted that 35 criminals with murder charges were released on parol which is unconstitutional and directed the authorities to re-arrest them immediately and ordered the lower courts to not issue bail for such criminals. If the government is failing to do her duties then somebody has to do it?
Tht means simple they SC is virtualy is runing a govt by its own?
No, but they have stopped becoming the tissue paper of every powerful organisation of this country and regaining their strength already defined in the constitution of Pakistan.
Why don't these QanoonI thugs tell the trial courts or the junior courts to nt let's terroists getting bails, why couldn't they tell the politicians what kind of amendments they should do to bring fast & accurate justice to the poors of pakistan?
The CJ has asserted many times to stricken the law for anti terrorist courts, the judges in the Karachi case were furious after pointing out that about 3500 criminals were set free due to lack of evidence. It is parliament's job to pass such resolutions and amend the constitution to tighten the grip on the terrorists. The courts can only speak about it but cannot introduce such laws to imprison anybody by their own will.
No they r the traitors who r working on a decided script to defame Pakarmy , to the level where it can say to the politicians to sell their nucks!
and so were the army generals who violated the constitution over and over again? and so is every major political party in Pakistan?
Well if they think. They can do this with help of dam corupt politicians thn they r damm wrong , they get a long boot on their backs vry soon , be rest asured!
not gonnai happen anytime soon. General Kayani has shown a lot of maturity in his career and I don't think he is going to do such a stupid thing anytime soon. He had multiple opportunities to overthrow the government and when the entire public would have welcomed him but he didn't interfere in democratic process and I see no reason he will do that in future.
