This hasn't been acknowledged by the Swiss government.
A country can't be run where you jail a person for 100 rps theft and are arguing to let go a person who has robbed the nation of over 100 million.
Pakistan gained adherance to law n order and procedure. Top leadership finds it harder to cheat Pakistanis. Judiciary is important, that shouldn't be rocket science.
The nation is seeing that they HAVE all these cases against them, hence they should elect clean individuals.
The law states anyone can file a petition, it is the right of every Pakistani citizen. Perhaps if there weren't as many law breakers in Pakistan, the courts won't be so busy either.
Well,
Nation has elected already the sons of gillani, so ur question is just a joke, cause in this country cure of every ill is money, & thts why Cj & his son is made the dam billions ?
I think you need to see all, the faisal abidi episodes care fully, he on the behalf of zardari blackmailed CJ & had showen all the evidences live, now after doing that they just backed away,thts why NAB was taken out of the investigation of Arsalan CH.because govt closed its eyeson it & why SC gave ARsalan his choice of investigator thts another dam question!
Isn't it!
Well, there many others who wants to know the answers of many different questions!
Some of them are!
Syed Zaid Zaman Hamid [Official]
We want to ask 3 Questions from the CJ:
Pakistan has been destroyed by the Terrorists, the Media and the corruption. But we want to ask 3 questions about the role of judiciary?
1. Why the Judiciary has NOT punished a single terrorist in the last 10 years??? When courts refuse to do their primary responsibility of punishing the criminals, then what good is this judicial system? What should army do when suicide bombers are released by the courts???
2. Why the courts do not take up cases against the anarchist media??? All petitions filed against media in the supreme court are either rejected or being dragged without being formally admitted? It is clear that courts are avoiding the accountability of media despite blatant proof that media needs strongest accountability for treason and creating anarchy?
3. When Supreme Court has themselves proved that political governments in Baluchistan and Sindh have failed constitutionally and the ruling parties are involved in terrorism and corruption, then why doesn't Supreme Court dismiss these governments and is allowing the political parties to destroy the nation??
Iftikhar chaudrey sahib, Nation want answers! Pakistan is being destroyed and we feel that courts are that NOT doing their duty in these times of war. This Pakistan is sacred, not any man made law. We feel that you are also very harsh against the pak army.
You have not done anything yet to prove that our analysis is wrong. You need to punish the terrorists. You need to restrain the traitor media. You need to remove the corrupt regime. If you are not doing this, then whats the point of having a judiciary??
They say judges don't speak. Their judgements speak. But we see that you speak a lot but there are no judgements of substance. Why is that so Mr. CJ? Nation is asking
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-13-18652-Yesterday-we-saw-how-much-the-army-respects-the-judiciary-CJ
Why your stupid mouth, is still in work , against army?
Yesterday we saw how much the army respects the judiciary: CJ
*
*
Wednesday, November 07, 2012
From Print Edition
*
*
*492 *160 *10 *1
*
Says authority to render final decision rests with SC; no one should remain under any delusion; judiciary is strong; Constitution and tanks should not be compared
*
ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry observed on Tuesday that no one should remain under any delusion as the authority to render the final decision rests with the apex court. He made this observation while heading a three-member bench of the Supreme Court during the course of hearing of a petition on the medias role after the Abbottabad operation.
*
Raja Irshad, the counsel for the petitioner, argued that the media had pitted the army chief and chief justice against each other. He said no one should see the statement of the army chief from a wrong angle.
*
On this, the chief justice observed: We have seen yesterday (Monday) how much respect the army gives to the judiciary. Our position is quite clear. No one should remain under any delusion.
*
The chief justice called for President Asif Ali Zardaris article published in a US newspaper after the Abbottabad operation. Raja Irshad read the presidents article before the bench.
*
Raja Irshad said that Pakistan armed forces were maligned in a planned manner, but it had always respected the court and implemented all its orders. The chief justice said the apex court had not asked the army to implement its any order so far.
*
Raja Irshad contended that violation of constitutional provision enshrined in Article 19-A was going on without being checked.
*
The chief justice told the counsel to go through the relevant record, a press statement by the ISPR and former Pakistan ambassador to the US Husain Haqqanis statements on the May 2 incident and then substantiate his points.
*
Justice Iftikhar said the SC was not weak and all points raised in the petition were being seriously scrutinised.
*
Raja Irshad said the institution had been maligned in the garb of accountability of generals. He said anyone working against the Constitution should be brought under the scanner of the law. He said the enemies of the country were launching attacks from the four sides due to Pakistans nuclear capability. He said the enemy would have ruined Pakistan had the nuclear power not been acquired.
*
At that point, the chief justice reminded Raja Irshad that he was the counsel for petitioner Sardar Muhammad Ghazi, not the Pakistan Army. The Constitution and tanks should not be compared, the chief justice said, adding that it was the responsibility of the army chief to give a statement on the maligning of the institution.
*
The court later adjourned the hearing till November 22.The petition filed in the apex court states that following the incident of May 2, 2011, the media played a role in discrediting the countrys judiciary and its army.The petitioner is seeking a ban on the media for criticising the armed forces, intelligence agencies and other defence and security institutions.
So from now, on wards !
He is wishing for something, extra?
Well, he,ill going to get!sure.