What's new

Punjab govt takes over Sialkot mosque: local headquarters of Jaish-e-Muhammad (JeM)

.
I haven't mentioned Gaddafi in I think two months or more.



But I have also written against RSS and Co.



JeM openly admitted to have carried out the Pulwama attack.
but masood reject it in his speech . he said he have nothing to do with attack
 
. .
Go to Indian forum and do that. We do not need your lectures.

When the forum management decide to remove all the Indian members I will go too.

And you should be proud that this forum attracts all nationalities, including from India.

but masood reject it in his speech . he said he have nothing to do with attack

Can you point to such an article ??
 
.
When the forum management decide to remove all the Indian members I will go too.

And you should be proud that this forum attracts all nationalities, including from India.



Can you point to such an article ??
i think sites host his audio banned in india
 
. .
So India got what it wanted in the end, and all it had to do was bomb some trees as claimed by Pakistan.

looks like Pakistan is trying to save face after repeatedly being exposed as a state sponsor of terrorism in front of the whole world.
 
.
So India got what it wanted in the end, and all it had to do was bomb some trees as claimed by Pakistan.

looks like Pakistan is trying to save face after repeatedly being exposed as a state sponsor of terrorism in front of the whole world.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

This shows you literally have NO idea how things actually work in Pakistan.

Going by your same logic: india already got what it wanted in 2003 when Pakistan "banned" Hafiz Saeed and govt "took control" of his madrassas. (It did the same with Masood Azhar back in 2005 as well!)


......and yet here we are :)

Reality is: india got humiliated, beaten, and embarrassed at the hands of Pakistani military (as always).

Status-quo remains on all accounts. And that's what Pakistan wants and always gets (while india keeps on crying about 'terrorism' while world does give any shits).

Hell, you couldn't even get Masood Azhar declared terrorist at UN even after Pulwama and the crisis afterwards. THAT's your aukat :lol:
 
.
So India got what it wanted in the end, and all it had to do was bomb some trees as claimed by Pakistan.

looks like Pakistan is trying to save face after repeatedly being exposed as a state sponsor of terrorism in front of the whole world.

Who has declared Pakistan as state sponsor of terrorism?

And if you think India got what it wanted, what do you think happened with Khulbhusan Yadav, heck what happened with Shakil Afridi? I always say this about bhartis, they will always delude themselves into alternate realities that suit their worldview to make themselves feel better, and you are a perfect example of that?
 
.
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

This shows you literally have NO idea how things actually work in Pakistan.

Going by your same logic: india already got what it wanted in 2003 when Pakistan "banned" Hafiz Saeed and govt "took control" of his madrassas. (It did the same with Masood Azhar back in 2005 as well!)


......and yet here we are :)

Reality is: india got humiliated, beaten, and embarrassed at the hands of Pakistani military (as always).

Status-quo remains on all accounts. And that's what Pakistan wants and always gets (while india keeps on crying about 'terrorism' while world does give any shits).

Hell, you couldn't even get Masood Azhar declared terrorist at UN even after Pulwama and the crisis afterwards. THAT's your aukat :lol:
And India is on FATF grey list for financing terrorism across the world. :enjoy:
 
. .
As usual bharti changing and deflecting topic :lol:

What do you know about the FATF grey list any way?
The Pakistani establishment seem to know a lot more than me:lol:, they are taking actions against these groups in a hurry before the session in May which decides on the fate of promotion/demotion from grey list.
 
.
And India is on FATF grey list for financing terrorism across the world. :enjoy:
No it is not. India appears squeaky clean in front of the world and looks as innocent as new born baby. This is a fact nobody can deny.

Unfortunately on the other hand. Across most of the world Pakistan is just another name for terrorism, extremism and trouble. That is why when showing up at airports with a Pakistan passport gets alarm bells ringing. In fact my experiance has been even with British passport if it has Pakistan entry stamp on it attracts suspicion. Questions like "have you been to Pakistan and if so why' are routine. Pakistan looks as dirty as they come.

So what gives? Well the blunt truth is both India and Pakistan have as much claim to being 'terrorist' as each other. The recent release of the Samjouta Express bombers, retired Indian Army officers invovement in supply of explosives. Gujrat genocide as the no less than current PM of Modi's hands dribbling in blood. This was acknowledged fact as Modi was widely blamed across the world for the genocide. The reality was India voted a internationally infamous terrorist as Prime Minister making joke of Indian's pointing fingers at Masood Azhar. The equivalent would be Pakistan votes Masood as PM.


"Indian politics Memento Modi

If Narendra Modi wants to lead India, he needs to show contrition for the slaughter of Muslims"



https://www.economist.com/leaders/2013/04/13/memento-modi
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...endra-modi-massacre-next-prime-minister-india
https://www.hudson.org/research/4575-hinduism-and-terror


So what gives?


Simple. I saw this coming in early in 1990s. I remember talking with a friend about this over two decades ago. You see the Indian terrorism deadly and bloody as it is has always been directed at either Pakistan or minorities on the fringe within India. That the targets of Indian terrorism is Pakistan or weak groups within India who have no voice like Muslims, Dalits or even Christians who mostly form the bottom layer of Indian society. essenetially nobody gives a flying fcuk about them. Thus India can kill Indian Muslims, Dalits etc or engage in terrorism activities within Pakistan as we saw reports of Indian sponsorship of MQM and the violence in that city. However non of this rings bells in New York, London, Paris, Berlin, Brussels etc. Thus you see little to no media coverage over this. Result India walks away squeeky clean even when it has a terrorist as PM.

Now going back to two decades ago and Pakistan. The 'terrorism' directed by Pakistan or Pakistani's or people of Pakistan origin has got distracted. Instead of only targeting India we ended up shooting a shotgun which hit not only India but New York, London, Paris etc and thus brought the world on India;s side. This began when in 1990s Kashmiri separatists killed some Europeans backpackers in the valley. This brought international condemnation which India used to sail it's argumant as the victim. Then we had Pakistani citizens involved in CIA attack, 1992 Twin Tower attack. This was just the begining. By 2000s Pakistan terrorism was hitting the streets of New York, London and western targets inside Pakistan were regularly attacked. India used this opportunity to show that the west was victim of the same monster as they were inside Kashmir and India. With Mumbai attacks just about cementing this.

Result world bodies began to take action against Pakistan. In a sense we made this situation for ourselves. If I say India is my enemy rest of the world will remain uninterested. If I say India, Israel, USA is evil then sure I will be helping to ring trouble on myself from the world.

After Gujrat massacres if RSS Hindu extremists had hit London, New York, killed Americans in India and then Modi had given speaches about the evil Israel, USA and the west today India would be in bother like Pakistan is ~ even if because it is bigger it might weather it better.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom