abjktu
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2014
- Messages
- 1,801
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Not sure...But there are few Kerala board(Malayalam/English medium)schools in Gulf area...I heard most of the Malayalis study in CBSE schools in the gulf.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure...But there are few Kerala board(Malayalam/English medium)schools in Gulf area...I heard most of the Malayalis study in CBSE schools in the gulf.
Well most of the Tamils like @Sriram love to work in Bangalore instead of Chennai, I can't understand what he is bragging about.
Now, west has controlled Pakistan first and now it is India's turn.
Also, contrary to Sir @Joe Shearer view that Brits were anti-Hindu, I would say the Brits were exceptionally pro-Hindu. They gave the Hindus a united political entity in India -- something which hadn't existed for thousands of years. As noted above, this was very uncharacteristic;.the standard colonial practice was to create a mosaic of small countries, deliberately carved out to create mischief for years to come.
Hindi is not needed in Bangalore..I too working near Bangalore..I speak Kannada and some times Tamil..Tamil is widely understood..Well most of the Tamils like @Sriram love to work in Bangalore instead of Chennai, I can't understand what he is bragging about.
Not sure...But there are few Kerala board(Malayalam/English medium)schools in Gulf area...
Let's see. But it seems like your getting more in hands of west.They couldn't do it when we were weak, they will not be do it when we are strong.
Indians have a great tendency and characteristics of even defining the greatest friendships. We always keep some distances
Hindi is not needed in Bangalore..I too working near Bangalore..I speak Kannada and some times Tamil..Tamil is widely understood..
Tamils are around 27% of Bangalore and they are also one of the earliest settlers..
Moreover Bangalore is only 30 km from Tamilnadu border...
Also one of the reasons why it would not have worked.I think even Ayub Khan had also proposed a joint Indo-Pak defense agreement , in a federation with two autonomous province & Quaid e Azam Md.Ali Jinnah as its prime minister, the Quaid would almost certainly make sure that the arm forces had the maximum numbers of Muslims , & that would be the masterstroke with which, the power of running federal India would ultimately favour the Muslims , it was the best solution ,which power hungry Nehru & the ever deceitful British had to ruin it, & they did
he who has the Army, has the keys to Authority !
North Karnataka is more close to NI culture..Even in their food habits,dressing styles too..I know it, many of my colleagues used to speak in Tamil at many locations. Although Hindi was enough for me, even you speak English, the guys in the front started speaking Hindi. Even in North Karnataka, Hindi was enough.
The Brits did give a balkalized India.If Britain wanted to retard the spread of socialism/communism in the region, it would have created a dozen states in the subcontinent which would continually be at each other's throats, not posing a threat to anyone outside the region. That's what the Brits did in the Middle East, Africa and the rest of their dominions.
I know this mate , it was Nehru & his lust for power who rejected it, you will be amazed to learn that it was Qauid-e-Azam Md.Ali Jinnah & Mahatma Gandhi, who agreed to the cabinet mission plan , when Gandhi ji supported Md.Ali Jinnah in this, Nehru felt betrayed by Gandhi (note the role of Gandhi in negotiation with the British, diminished considerably after that , as Nehru made sure that Gandhi becomes symbolic rather then have a say in political matters in the real term) in fact the cabinet mission plan was the undisputed victory of both Qauid-e-Azam & Allama Iqbal , as the struggle from the beginning was to secure two large autonomous provinces within the framework of a federation , I think even Ayub Khan had also proposed a joint Indo-Pak defense agreement , in a federation with two autonomous province & Quaid e Azam Md.Ali Jinnah as its prime minister, the Quaid would almost certainly make sure that the arm forces had the maximum numbers of Muslims , & that would be the masterstroke with which, the power of running federal India would ultimately favour the Muslims , it was the best solution ,which power hungry Nehru & the ever deceitful British had to ruin it, & they did
he who has the Army, has the keys to Authority !
This is why Nehru didn't agree to the plan and correctly so.
From the beginning you could see, Jinnah had no intention of unity. He only intended to ensure Muslim rule over sub continent in the disguise of his evil plan.
One nation means no discrimination on bases on religion (caste, colour, region). Jinnah's plan was based on discrimination based on religion. You cannot be living in a democracy and have different rules for different religions.
His plan was incapable to integrate the country, but would only encourage more division and civil war.
Why do Muslims have problem in living under same rules as every citizen of the country? Why he needs special privileges for Muslims in united India?
why cannot Muslims live like everyone else? Why Muslims want to be in Majority in Army? Why they want everything based on Religion?
and why Muslims need a Majorty Muslim army in a Hindu majority nation. Is it to try and do what they did to non Muslims in Pakistan in whole subcontinent?
Nehru was absolutely right in rejecting such a discriminatory plan for special benefits to Muslims.
It's good division happened, what Jinnah was demanding was absolutely unreasonable and non consistent with democratic and secular values.
And British didn't gave the whole Inbdia, they gave what they had. Vast areas were controlled by kings and other foreign colonies. GoI under leadership of Sarder Patel united India one by one.
The Brits did give a balkalized India.
Im all for it
Bangladesh, WB, Odissa, Bihar, UP, Chattishgar, Sikkim, Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Nagaland, Mizoram, AP, Tripura
The East Zone.
Oh please. I have seen what socialists have done to Kerala. And have done to other nations. Please don't throw me in with their lot.
I speculated pre-independence division of India. But, any division of India now is not at all feasible. As an example, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala have water disputes among them. It is the Indian Union and the Supreme court apparatus they look to solve the solutions.
I oppose any splits now, as it will be bloody and messy.